IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaitra/v90y2021ics0969699720305470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic management of aircraft stand allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Skorupski, Jacek
  • Å»arów, Piotr

Abstract

This paper aimed to present an original approach for solving the aircraft stand allocation (SA) problem dynamically when due to operational disturbances, the planned allocation cannot be accomplished. The proposed Multiple-criteria Dynamic Stand Allocation (MDSA) method uses fuzzy logic to support decision-making under uncertainty. The MDSA method provides effective solutions in a short time, necessary for traffic management in case of delays, emergency, and untypical cases. It considers partially conflicting points of view of different airport users (airport managers, air traffic controllers, airlines, handling agents, and passengers) and may significantly support managers on the SA problem. The approach proposed can also be used for creating an initial SA plan for a considerable number of aircraft.

Suggested Citation

  • Skorupski, Jacek & Å»arów, Piotr, 2021. "Dynamic management of aircraft stand allocation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:90:y:2021:i:c:s0969699720305470
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699720305470
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan, Shangyao & Shieh, Chi-Yuan & Chen, Miawjane, 2002. "A simulation framework for evaluating airport gate assignments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 885-898, December.
    2. Dorndorf, Ulrich & Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yury & Pesch, Erwin, 2007. "Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 326-334, June.
    3. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2007. "A heuristic approach for airport gate assignments for stochastic flight delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 547-567, July.
    4. Oscar R. P. van Schaijk & Hendrikus G. Visser, 2017. "Robust flight-to-gate assignment using flight presence probabilities," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 928-945, November.
    5. Bert Dijk & Bruno F. Santos & Joao P. Pita, 2019. "The recoverable robust stand allocation problem: a GRU airport case study," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(3), pages 615-639, September.
    6. Maharjan, Binod & Matis, Timothy I., 2011. "An optimization model for gate reassignment in response to flight delays," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 256-261.
    7. A Bolat, 2001. "Models and a genetic algorithm for static aircraft-gate assignment problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(10), pages 1107-1120, October.
    8. R. S. Mangoubi & Dennis F. X. Mathaisel, 1985. "Optimizing Gate Assignments at Airport Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 173-188, May.
    9. Tang, Ching-Hui & Wang, Wei-Chung, 2013. "Airport gate assignments for airline-specific gates," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 10-16.
    10. Yan, Shangyao & Huo, Cheun-Ming, 2001. "Optimization of multiple objective gate assignments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 413-432, June.
    11. Haghani, Ali & Chen, Min-Ching, 1998. "Optimizing gate assignments at airport terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 437-454, August.
    12. Narciso, Mercedes E. & Piera, Miquel A., 2015. "Robust gate assignment procedures from an airport management perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 82-95.
    13. Zhang, Dong & Klabjan, Diego, 2017. "Optimization for gate re-assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 260-284.
    14. Guépet, J. & Acuna-Agost, R. & Briant, O. & Gayon, J.P., 2015. "Exact and heuristic approaches to the airport stand allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 597-608.
    15. Şeker, Merve & Noyan, Nilay, 2012. "Stochastic optimization models for the airport gate assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 438-459.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Artur Kierzkowski & Tomasz Kisiel & Piotr Uchroński, 2021. "Simulation Model of Airport Security Lanes with Power Consumption Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Andrzej CHUDZIKIEWICZ & Andrzej KRZYSZKOWSKI & Anna STELMACH, 2021. "Asymmetric Threats In Terms Of Safety Of Railway Systems," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(3), pages 131-140, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Dong & Klabjan, Diego, 2017. "Optimization for gate re-assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 260-284.
    2. Daş, Gülesin Sena & Gzara, Fatma & Stützle, Thomas, 2020. "A review on airport gate assignment problems: Single versus multi objective approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Xu, Liang & Zhang, Chao & Xiao, Feng & Wang, Fan, 2017. "A robust approach to airport gate assignment with a solution-dependent uncertainty budget," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 458-478.
    4. Karsu, Özlem & Azizoğlu, Meral & Alanlı, Kerem, 2021. "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the airport gate assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Li, Mingjie & Hao, Jin-Kao & Wu, Qinghua, 2022. "Learning-driven feasible and infeasible tabu search for airport gate assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 172-186.
    6. Bert Dijk & Bruno F. Santos & Joao P. Pita, 2019. "The recoverable robust stand allocation problem: a GRU airport case study," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(3), pages 615-639, September.
    7. Bagamanova, Margarita & Mota, Miguel Mujica, 2020. "A multi-objective optimization with a delay-aware component for airport stand allocation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Amadeo Ascó, 2016. "An Analysis of Robustness Approaches for the Airport Baggage Sorting Station Assignment Problem," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-19, September.
    9. Guépet, J. & Acuna-Agost, R. & Briant, O. & Gayon, J.P., 2015. "Exact and heuristic approaches to the airport stand allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 597-608.
    10. Yin, Suwan & Han, Ke & Ochieng, Washington Yotto & Sanchez, Daniel Regueiro, 2022. "Joint apron-runway assignment for airport surface operations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 76-100.
    11. Dorndorf, Ulrich & Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yury & Pesch, Erwin, 2005. "Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 584, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Şeker, Merve & Noyan, Nilay, 2012. "Stochastic optimization models for the airport gate assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 438-459.
    13. Ulrich Dorndorf & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2017. "Flight gate assignment and recovery strategies with stochastic arrival and departure times," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(1), pages 65-93, January.
    14. Pternea, Moschoula & Haghani, Ali, 2019. "An aircraft-to-gate reassignment framework for dealing with schedule disruptions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 116-132.
    15. Kim, Junyoung & Goo, Byungju & Roh, Youngjoo & Lee, Chungmok & Lee, Kyungsik, 2023. "A branch-and-price approach for airport gate assignment problem with chance constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-26.
    16. Ulrich Dorndorf & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2012. "Flight gate scheduling with respect to a reference schedule," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 177-187, April.
    17. Narciso, Mercedes E. & Piera, Miquel A., 2015. "Robust gate assignment procedures from an airport management perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 82-95.
    18. Hagspihl, Thomas & Kolisch, Rainer & Ruf, Christian & Schiffels, Sebastian, 2022. "Dynamic gate configurations at airports: A network optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1133-1148.
    19. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2007. "A heuristic approach for airport gate assignments for stochastic flight delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 547-567, July.
    20. Dorndorf, Ulrich & Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yury & Pesch, Erwin, 2007. "Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 326-334, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:90:y:2021:i:c:s0969699720305470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-air-transport-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.