Is distance learning really a substitute for on-site learning? Perceptions of faculty who teach undergraduate economics using both formats
This study draws from the divergent conclusions found in distance learning studies in general compared to those done within economics. Most studies of distance learning report no difference in learning outcomes compared to in class instruction. This is challenged by controlled studies within economics which report a negative difference in distance learning. Economics faculties who have taught the same undergraduate courses using both methods were surveyed. They perceive a learning advantage in onsite learning but not in learning outcomes. What explains this anomaly and what does it suggest about the growing use of distance learning in higher education? The survey suggests that differences in learning outcomes may reflect differences in evaluative techniques. This implies that distance and onsite learning are not perfect substitutes and suggests that learning tradeoffs must be managed. One example relates to faculty training on the importance of standardizing evaluative techniques.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 14 (2013)
Issue (Month): C ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:14:y:2013:i:c:p:4-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.