Distributional asymmetry of loadings on market co-moments
The market coskewness puzzle has occupied the empirical asset pricing research since the third-moment asset pricing model was introduced by Kraus and Litzenberger (1976) and Friend and Westerfield (1980). Using the Fama-French 49 US industry portfolios this paper empirically shows that the loading on market coskewness and market cokurtosis components of higher co-moment asset pricing models are not robust across the outcome of the conditional return distribution. However, for most of the 49 industry portfolios it seems like the loadings on market covariance are very robust, almost constant, across the conditional return distribution. The loadings on market coskewness, on the other hand, are not robust but show a very distinct profile, increasing from negative in the left tail to positive in the right tail, and this profile is surprisingly similar across all the 49 industry portfolios. Finally, the results for the loading on market cokurtosis remain puzzling. The findings imply that separation of bull and bear markets and/or applying discrete regime switching approaches may not be sufficient to fully account for the asymmetric higher market co-moment effects. Furthermore, improvement in adjusted R-squares using higher market co-moments stems from market coskewness and appears only in the tails of the conditional return distribution.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 21 (2011)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/intfin|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:21:y:2011:i:5:p:851-866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.