IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v34y2014i2p200-209.html

The role of the professional association: A grounded theory study of Electronic Medical Records usage in Ontario, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Shaw, Norman

Abstract

Many professionals utilize computer systems to assist them with the exercise of their skilled knowledge. These systems are designed with many core features, but their adoption is heterogeneous, with some users adopting more features than others. In this qualitative study, the empirical context is the use of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) by primary care physicians in Ontario, Canada. We have collected data from interviews, and by using the methodology of grounded theory, we theorize that guidance from the professional association to which the members belong is able to positively influence its members to adopt more core features. Although professionals operate with a high degree of autonomy, their professional association governs their actions. By setting standards and offering education, the association is able to guide its members to make more enhanced use of core features. The theoretical contribution is the conceptualization of a higher order construct, Professional Association Guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaw, Norman, 2014. "The role of the professional association: A grounded theory study of Electronic Medical Records usage in Ontario, Canada," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 200-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:2:p:200-209
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401213001643
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina), 1993. "CASE tools as organizational change : investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development," Working papers WP 3579-93., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. Agourram, Hafid, 2009. "Defining information system success in Germany," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 129-137.
    3. Ejis, 2010. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    4. Ejis, 2010. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    5. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    6. Gerardine DeSanctis & Marshall Scott Poole, 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 121-147, May.
    7. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information system use-related activity : An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use," Post-Print hal-02311855, HAL.
    8. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information system use-related activity : An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use," Post-Print hal-02312468, HAL.
    9. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information System Use--Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 173-192, June.
    10. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong Cai & Mohamed Abouzahra, 2023. "The influence of strong and weak ties in physician peer networks on new drug adoption," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 133-147, March.
    2. Diana Kusriyanti & Budi Matuwi & . Supriyantoro, 2021. "Readiness Analysis of Electronic Medical Record Implementation at Dinda Tangerang Hospital Using Correlational Method," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 6(4), pages 19-25, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sang-Soo Kim & Yong Jin Kim, 2025. "Toward the Understanding of the Appropriation of Compliance Support System in Organizations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1719-1738, August.
    2. Efpraxia D. Zamani & Nancy Pouloudi & George M. Giaglis & Jonathan Wareham, 2022. "Appropriating Information Technology Artefacts through Trial and Error: The Case of the Tablet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 97-119, February.
    3. Hillol Bala & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2016. "Adaptation to Information Technology: A Holistic Nomological Network from Implementation to Job Outcomes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 156-179, January.
    4. Kwan Soo Hong & DonHee Lee, 2018. "Impact of operational innovations on customer loyalty in the healthcare sector," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(3), pages 575-600, September.
    5. Jani Merikivi & Antti Salovaara & Matti Mäntymäki & Lilong Zhang, 2018. "On the way to understanding binge watching behavior: the over-estimated role of involvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(1), pages 111-122, February.
    6. Ann-Frances Cameron & Jane Webster, 2013. "Multicommunicating: Juggling Multiple Conversations in the Workplace," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 352-371, June.
    7. Sascha Alavi & Matthias Weiss & Julia Backmann & Arnd Vomberg & Christina Desernot, 2026. "The Impact of Transparency-Inducing Management Information System Use on Employees’ Daily Work Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 44-62, March.
    8. Jean-Charles Pillet & Kevin Carillo & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni, 2020. "What Does It Do? Theorizing Functional Ambiguity As A Factor Influencing User Perceptions Of Information Technology," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03026903, HAL.
    9. Sun, Jonghak & Teng, James T.C., 2017. "The construct of information systems use benefits: Theoretical explication of its underlying dimensions and the development of a measurement scale," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 400-416.
    10. Kwahk, Kee-Young & Ahn, Hyunchul & Ryu, Young U., 2018. "Understanding mandatory IS use behavior: How outcome expectations affect conative IS use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-76.
    11. Yu Tong & Sharon Swee-Lin Tan & Hock-Hai Teo, 2015. "The Road to Early Success: Impact of System Use in the Swift Response Phase," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 418-436, June.
    12. Jean-Charles Pillet & Kevin Carillo & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni, 2020. "What Does It Do? Theorizing Functional Ambiguity As A Factor Influencing User Perceptions Of Information Technology," Post-Print hal-03026903, HAL.
    13. Do Giang Nguyen & Minh-Tri Ha, 2022. "What Makes Users Continue to Want to Use the Digital Platform? Evidence From the Ride-Hailing Service Platform in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    14. Andrew Burton-Jones & Camille Grange, 2013. "From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 632-658, September.
    15. John D'Ambra & Concepción S. Wilson & Shahriar Akter, 2013. "Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 48-64, January.
    16. Guohou Shan & Liangfei Qiu, 2026. "Examining the Impact of Generative AI on Users’ Voluntary Knowledge Contribution: Evidence from a Natural Experiment on Stack Overflow," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 1021-1041, June.
    17. Hilal Atasoy & Rajiv D. Banker & Paul A. Pavlou, 2021. "Information Technology Skills and Labor Market Outcomes for Workers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 437-461, June.
    18. Sven Dittes & Stefan Smolnik, 2019. "Towards a digital work environment: the influence of collaboration and networking on employee performance within an enterprise social media platform," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1215-1243, December.
    19. Andrew Burton-Jones & Olga Volkoff, 2017. "How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 468-489, September.
    20. Robert G. Fichman, 2004. "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 132-154, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:2:p:200-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.