IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v33y2013i5p707-715.html

Perceived critical mass and collective intention in social media-supported small group communication

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Xiao-Liang
  • Cheung, Christy M.K.
  • Lee, Matthew K.O.

Abstract

The increasing popularity of Web 2.0 has dramatically changed the way in which people communicate with others in their daily life or work. However, the use of social media is fundamentally different from that of traditional information technologies. Specifically, it requires collective efforts and interdependence between two or more people, and thus the usage behavior is no longer an individual's own decision or plan. Built on critical mass theory and social influence processes, this study tries to make an attempt to understand the determinants of collective intention (we-intention), which represents one's perception of a group of people acting as a unit. Instant messaging, one of the most popular social media platforms, has been chosen for investigation, and findings from a survey showed that perceived critical mass influenced we-intention both directly and indirectly through group norm and social identity. Recognizing the importance and relevance of collective intention will advance current understanding beyond individual intention-based models which are widely adopted in prior IS research. This study may be limited by having not included other alternative social technologies, but we leave this work for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Xiao-Liang & Cheung, Christy M.K. & Lee, Matthew K.O., 2013. "Perceived critical mass and collective intention in social media-supported small group communication," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 707-715.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:707-715
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401213000601
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Ling & Lu, Yaobin & Wang, Bin & Chau, Patrick Y.K. & Zhang, Long, 2012. "Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: A social capital perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 574-588.
    2. Koo, Chulmo & Wati, Yulia & Jung, Jason J., 2011. "Examination of how social aspects moderate the relationship between task characteristics and usage of social communication technologies (SCTs) in organizations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 445-459.
    3. Richard P. Bagozzi & Utpal M. Dholakia, 2006. "Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1099-1115, July.
    4. Zhao, Sesia J. & Zhang, Kem Z.K. & Wagner, Christian & Chen, Huaping, 2013. "Investigating the determinants of contribution value in Wikipedia," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 83-92.
    5. Papadopoulos, Thanos & Stamati, Teta & Nopparuch, Pawit, 2013. "Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 133-146.
    6. Raimo Tuomela, 2000. "Collective and joint intention," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 1(2), pages 39-69, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mäntymäki, Matti & Riemer, Kai, 2014. "Digital natives in social virtual worlds: A multi-method study of gratifications and social influences in Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 210-220.
    2. Dhir, Amandeep & Kaur, Puneet & Rajala, Risto, 2018. "Why do young people tag photos on social networking sites? Explaining user intentions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 117-127.
    3. Rana Saeed Al-Maroof & Khadija Alhumaid & Iman Akour & Said Salloum, 2021. "Factors That Affect E-Learning Platforms after the Spread of COVID-19: Post Acceptance Study," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Namin, Aidin & Dehdashti, Yashar & Ketron, Seth C., 2025. "Critical mass in a crowd: A predictive model of online crowdfunding of public goods in the U.S. vs. U.K," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Allam, Hesham & Bliemel, Michael & Spiteri, Louise & Blustein, James & Ali-Hassan, Hossam, 2019. "Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging tools: A theoretical model and empirical validation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 211-222.
    6. Li-Chen Yu & Chia-Lin Hsu, 2022. "Understanding Users’ Urge to Post Online Reviews: A Study Based on Existence, Relatedness, and Growth Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    7. Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & McLean, Graeme & Islam, Nazrul & Appiah Otoo, Brigid, 2022. "What drives me there? The interplay of socio-psychological gratification and consumer values in social media brand engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 288-307.
    8. Yuan, Yun-Peng & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Ooi, Keng-Boon, 2025. "What shapes mobile fintech consumers' post-adoption experience? A multi-analytical PLS-ANN-fsQCA perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Yi-Wen Chen, 2020. "Sustainable Value Co-Creation in the Virtual Community: How Diversified Co-Creation Experience Affects Co-Creation Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Braojos-Gomez, Jessica & Benitez-Amado, Jose & Javier Llorens-Montes, F., 2015. "How do small firms learn to develop a social media competence?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 443-458.
    11. Jinxin Yang & Din Jong, 2021. "Understanding Continuance Intention Determinants to Adopt Online Health Care Community: An Empirical Study of Food Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Farooq, Ali & Salminen, Joni & Dahabiyeh, Laila & Javed, Yousra & Jansen, Bernard J., 2026. "Does negative buzz result in social media discontinuation? Investigating the effects of negative word of mouth in the United States, India, and Finland," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braojos-Gomez, Jessica & Benitez-Amado, Jose & Javier Llorens-Montes, F., 2015. "How do small firms learn to develop a social media competence?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 443-458.
    2. O'Leary, Kevin & Gleasure, Rob & O'Reilly, Philip & Feller, Joseph, 2022. "Introducing the concept of creative ancestry as a means of increasing perceived fairness and satisfaction in online collaboration: An experimental study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Xuan Yang & Xiao Li & Daning Hu & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Differential impacts of social influence on initial and sustained participation in open source software projects," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(9), pages 1133-1147, September.
    4. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    5. Li, Yung-Ming & Lee, Yi-Lin, 2010. "Pricing peer-produced services: Quality, capacity, and competition issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1658-1668, December.
    6. Binhui Wei & Chunkai Zhao & Mingzhong Luo, 2025. "Returning Entrepreneurship and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Migrant Worker Households in Rural China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1-45, March.
    7. Mingfeng Lin & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Siva Viswanathan, 2013. "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-35, August.
    8. Junpeng Guo & Jiaqi Jiang & Siyuan Gou & Wenhua Li, 2026. "The impact of Danmu-enabled video-watching experience on audience loyalty intention towards vloggers: A parasocial relationship perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Francesco Rullani, 2006. "Dragging developers towards the core," KITeS Working Papers 190, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Feb 2007.
    10. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:851-874 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Yuxiang Zhao & Qinghua Zhu, 2014. "Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 417-434, July.
    12. Qin Ying & Md Mukitul Hoque & Sang-Joon Lee, 2023. "What factors determine users’ knowledge payment decisions? A mixed-method study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Peter Otto & Martin Simon, 2008. "Dynamic perspectives on social characteristics and sustainability in online community networks," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 321-347, September.
    14. Yuqing Ren & Jilin Chen & John Riedl, 2016. "The Impact and Evolution of Group Diversity in Online Open Collaboration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1668-1686, June.
    15. Shaun Meric Menezes & Ashok Kumar & Shantanu Dutta, 2025. "Navigating in Turbulent Times: Using Social Media to Examine Small and family-Owned Business Topics and Sentiments during the COVID-19 Crisis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1671-1691, August.
    16. repec:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:8:p:- is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Hadar Gafni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs Périlleux, 2021. "Business or Basic Needs? The Impact of Loan Purpose on Social Crowdfunding Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 777-793, November.
    18. Ramon Casadesus-Masanell & Gastón Llanes, 2011. "Mixed Source," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(7), pages 1212-1230, July.
    19. Abhishek Behl & Brinda Sampat & Sahil Raj, 2025. "An empirical investigation of repeated donations on crowdfunding platforms during COVID-19," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 1849-1877, May.
    20. Matthias P. Hühn, 2018. "CSR - the Cuckoo’s Egg in the Business Ethics Nest," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 279-298, December.
    21. Luo, Nuan & Zhang, Mingli & Hu, Mu & Wang, Yu, 2016. "How community interactions contribute to harmonious community relationships and customers’ identification in online brand community," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 673-685.
    22. Elina H. Hwang & Param Vir Singh & Linda Argote, 2015. "Knowledge Sharing in Online Communities: Learning to Cross Geographic and Hierarchical Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1593-1611, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:707-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.