IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v26y2006i6p457-468.html

The IS–business relationship and its implications for performance: An empirical study of South African and Australian organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Jason F.
  • Toleman, Mark

Abstract

Lack of a close ‘Information systems (IS)–business relationship’ has been described as a potential inhibitor to improving the contribution that information systems (IS) make to business performance. Yet the value of specific attributes of an enduring relationship between IS and business remains to be demonstrated by empirically confirming their link to IS performance. Using data collected from 167 South African and Australian companies, this study examined the effect of three relational attributes, namely commitment, mutual understanding and shared vision, on the contribution of IS to business performance. The study also examines the interrelationship amongst the relational attributes. Results revealed that a strong IS–business relationship is a significant determinant of IS performance. Organisations more successful in their use of IS are characterised by strong commitment on the part of the business to IS efforts, higher levels of IS understanding of the business, and a long-term agreement, between business and IS executives, on IS priorities. Results have important implications for organisations looking to improve the contribution of IS to organisational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Jason F. & Toleman, Mark, 2006. "The IS–business relationship and its implications for performance: An empirical study of South African and Australian organisations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 457-468.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:26:y:2006:i:6:p:457-468
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.06.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401206000818
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.06.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curtis P. Armstrong & V. Sambamurthy, 1999. "Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 304-327, December.
    2. Coughlan, Jane & Lycett, Mark & Macredie, Robert D., 2005. "Understanding the business–IT relationship," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 303-319.
    3. G. Premkumar & William R. King, 1994. "Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 75-109, June.
    4. Yolande E. Chan & Sid L. Huff & Donald W. Barclay & Duncan G. Copeland, 1997. "Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 125-150, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Štemberger, Mojca Indihar & Manfreda, Anton & Kovačič, Andrej, 2011. "Achieving top management support with business knowledge and role of IT/IS personnel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 428-436.
    2. Teubner, Rolf Alexander & Mocker, Martin, 2008. "A literature overview on strategic information systems planning," ERCIS Working Papers 6, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    3. Dong, Shutao, 2012. "Decision execution mechanisms of IT governance: The CRM case," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 147-157.
    4. Albert H. Segars & Varun Grover, 1999. "Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 199-232, September.
    5. King, William R. & Teo, Thompson S. H., 2000. "Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 667-679, December.
    6. Rajiv Sabherwal & Yolande E. Chan, 2001. "Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 11-33, March.
    7. Ling Xue & Gautam Ray & Xia Zhao, 2017. "Managerial Incentives and IT Strategic Posture," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 180-198, March.
    8. Richardson, Vernon J. & Sanchez, Juan Manuel & Setia, Pankaj & Smith, Rodney, 2018. "Determinants and consequences of chief information officer equity incentives," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 37-57.
    9. David S. Preston & Elena Karahanna, 2009. "Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 159-179, June.
    10. Hilal Atasoy & Rajiv D. Banker & Paul A. Pavlou, 2016. "On the Longitudinal Effects of IT Use on Firm-Level Employment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 6-26, March.
    11. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    12. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    13. Sanghyun Kim & Bora Kim & Minsoo Seo, 2020. "Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    15. Eymann, Torsten (Ed.), 2009. "Tagungsband zum Doctoral Consortium der WI 2009 [WI2009 Doctoral Consortium Proceedings]," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 40, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    16. Rajiv Banker & Yi Liang & Narayan Ramasubbu, 2021. "Technical Debt and Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 3174-3194, May.
    17. Feng, Cecilia (Qian) & Wang, Tawei, 2019. "Does CIO risk appetite matter? Evidence from information security breach incidents," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 59-75.
    18. Bergeron, François & Raymond, Louis & Rivard, Suzanne, 2001. "Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-142, April.
    19. Chi, Nguyen Thi Khanh, 2021. "Innovation capability: The impact of e-CRM and COVID-19 risk perception," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. Rui Bi & Robert M. Davison & Kosmas X. Smyrnios, 2017. "E-business and fast growth SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 559-576, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:26:y:2006:i:6:p:457-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.