IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v91y2009i3p314-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insight into capacity planning for cardiac catheterization services: Policy lessons learned from "Looking in the Mirror" over a decade

Author

Listed:
  • Mercuri, Mat
  • Natarajan, Madhu K.
  • Holder, Douglas H.
  • Xie, Changchun
  • Gafni, Amiram

Abstract

Background Cardiac catheterization (CATH) is key in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease. Increasing demand coupled with limited resources in a publicly funded system (e.g. Ontario, the largest province in Canada) resulted in a waitlist for this procedure. Our province has recommended maximum wait times (RMWT) for patients referred to CATH. The purpose of this study is to describe our experience over the past decade in attempting to meet RMWTs for patients needing CATH at our centre, and to discuss issues concerning capacity planning in providing timely service.Methods We measured the proportion of patients undergoing a procedure within the RWMT, and calculated both the mean number of patients and mean length of time on the wait list for each year over a decade for those referred to CATH using prospectively collected registry data. We identified factors that increased referrals or improved capacity. Wait time was compared to community standard RMWTs in order to establish if and how RMWTs were achieved.Results Despite a number of systematic and capacity improvements, RMWTs were not achieved until after the addition of a 4th laboratory.Interpretation Improving access to CATH in our centre was reactive to the increasing need of the community rather than based on anticipation of need and continuity of service within RMWTs. Registry data can help monitor key indicators (e.g. RMWT). Prudent use of this information should help policy makers with future expansion in our region.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercuri, Mat & Natarajan, Madhu K. & Holder, Douglas H. & Xie, Changchun & Gafni, Amiram, 2009. "Insight into capacity planning for cardiac catheterization services: Policy lessons learned from "Looking in the Mirror" over a decade," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 314-320, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:3:p:314-320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)00021-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewis, S. & Barer, M.L. & Sanmartin, C. & Sheps, S. & Shortt, S.E.D., 2000. "Ending Waiting-List Mismanagement: Principles and Practice," Centre for Health Services and Policy Research 2000:6, University of British Columbia - Centre for Health Services and Policy Research..
    2. Gupta, Diwakar & Natarajan, Madhu Kailash & Gafni, Amiram & Wang, Lei & Shilton, Don & Holder, Douglas & Yusuf, Salim, 2007. "Capacity planning for cardiac catheterization: A case study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Sanmartin, C. & Shortt, E.D. & Barer, M.L. & Sheps, S. & Lewis, S. & McDonald, P.W., 2000. "Waiting for Medical Services in Canda: Lots of Heat, but Little Light," Centre for Health Services and Policy Research 2000:5, University of British Columbia - Centre for Health Services and Policy Research..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mercuri, Mathew & Natarajan, Madhu K. & Norman, Geoff & Gafni, Amiram, 2012. "An even smaller area variation: Differing practice patterns among interventional cardiologists within a single high volume tertiary cardiac centre," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 179-185.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:3:p:314-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu) or (). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.