IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v161y2025ics0168851025001526.html

Strengthening primary health care: The new contribution of midwives to gynecological care in France

Author

Listed:
  • Roquebert, Quitterie
  • Panjo, Henri
  • Franc, Carine

Abstract

Many OECD countries are implementing reforms that redefine the roles of healthcare professionals to improve access to care and enhance the efficiency of the healthcare sector. In 2009, in a context of a shortage of gynecological primary care, France introduced a reform that expanded midwives’ scope of practice to include gynecological care for non-pregnant women, alongside their traditional roles in pregnancy and childbirth. This paper explores the effect of this reform on women’s healthcare utilization and examines how this effect varies according to women’s characteristics. Using administrative data on healthcare utilization among French women, we analyze changes in the probability of consulting a midwife between 2007 and 2017 among non-pregnant women aged 15 to 55. Our results show an increase in midwives’ use following the reform, particularly among recently pregnant women and those living in areas with poor access to healthcare services. Overall, the effect of the reform extending the primary care roles of health professionals on the use of care depends strongly on the provision of information about these new skills to the general public. Furthermore, we show that this reform is likely to strengthen the gynecological primary care supply in disadvantaged areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Roquebert, Quitterie & Panjo, Henri & Franc, Carine, 2025. "Strengthening primary health care: The new contribution of midwives to gynecological care in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:161:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025001526
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001526
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Looman, Willemijn & Struckmann, Verena & Köppen, Julia & Baltaxe, Erik & Czypionka, Thomas & Huic, Mirjana & Pitter, Janos & Ruths, Sabine & Stokes, Jonathan & Bal, Roland & Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen, 2021. "Drivers of successful implementation of integrated care for multi-morbidity: Mechanisms identified in 17 case studies from 8 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Christophe Loussouarn & Carine Franc & Yann Videau & Julien Mousquès, 2021. "Can General Practitioners Be More Productive? The Impact of Teamwork and Cooperation with Nurses on GP Activities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 680-698, March.
    3. Wei Pan, 2001. "Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 120-125, March.
    4. Sara Markowitz & Andrew J.D. Smith, 2023. "Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice and Patient Harm: Evidence from Medical Malpractice Cases and Adverse Action Reports," NBER Working Papers 31109, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Alexander, Diane & Schnell, Molly, 2019. "Just what the nurse practitioner ordered: Independent prescriptive authority and population mental health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 145-162.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/14771 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Traczynski, Jeffrey & Udalova, Victoria, 2018. "Nurse practitioner independence, health care utilization, and health outcomes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 90-109.
    8. Pavolini, Emmanuele & Kuhlmann, Ellen, 2016. "Health workforce development in the European Union: A matrix for comparing trajectories of change in the professions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 654-664.
    9. Wiegers, T. A., 2003. "General practitioners and their role in maternity care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 51-59, October.
    10. Markowitz, Sara & Adams, E. Kathleen & Lewitt, Mary Jane & Dunlop, Anne L., 2017. "Competitive effects of scope of practice restrictions: Public health or public harm?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 201-218.
    11. Chevillard, Guillaume & Mousquès, Julien, 2021. "Medically underserved areas: are primary care teams efficient at attracting and retaining general practitioners?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    12. Clara Dugord & Carine Franc, 2022. "Trajectories and individual determinants of regular cancer screening use over a long period based on data from the French E3N cohort," Post-Print hal-04385507, HAL.
    13. Dugord, Clara & Franc, Carine, 2022. "Trajectories and individual determinants of regular cancer screening use over a long period based on data from the French E3N cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    14. Tsiachristas, A. & Wallenburg, I. & Bond, C.M. & Elliot, R.F. & Busse, R. & van Exel, J. & Rutten-van Mölken, M.P. & de Bont, A., 2015. "Costs and effects of new professional roles: Evidence from a literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 1176-1187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoehn-Velasco, Lauren & Jolles, Diana R. & Plemmons, Alicia & Silverio-Murillo, Adan, 2023. "Health outcomes and provider choice under full practice authority for certified nurse-midwives," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Guo, Jiapei & Kilby, Angela E. & Marks, Mindy S., 2024. "The impact of scope-of-practice restrictions on access to medical care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Moiz Bhai & David T. Mitchell, 2024. "The effects of occupational licensing reform for nurse practitioners on children's health," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 91(1), pages 62-91, July.
    4. Jie Chen & Chad D. Meyerhoefer & Edward J. Timmons, 2024. "The effects of dental hygienist autonomy on dental care utilization," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), pages 1726-1747, August.
    5. Laura Barrie Smith, 2022. "The effect of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws on primary care delivery," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 21-41, January.
    6. Sukriti Beniwal & Lauren Hoehn‐Velasco & Diana R. Jolles, 2026. "Public health insurance expansions and non‐physician providers: Evidence from Certified Nurse Midwives," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), March.
    7. McMichael, Benjamin J., 2025. "The impact of nurse practitioner scope-of-practice laws on preventable hospitalizations," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Dugord, Clara & Franc, Carine, 2025. "Intergenerational transmission of preventive health-seeking behaviors: Like mother, like daughter? The case of cancer screening in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    9. Shishir Shakya & Alicia Plemmons, 2025. "Scope of practice and opioid prescribing behavior of nurse practitioners serving Medicare beneficiaries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 225-245, February.
    10. Tianyuan Luo & Cesar L. Escalante & Carmina E. Taylor, 2021. "Labor market outcomes of granting full professional independence to nurse practitioners," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 22-54, August.
    11. Chen, Alice J. & Munnich, Elizabeth L. & Parente, Stephen T. & Richards, Michael R., 2023. "Provider turf wars and Medicare payment rules," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Sara Markowitz & E. Kathleen Adams, 2022. "The Effects of State Scope of Practice Laws on the Labor Supply of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(1), pages 65-98.
    13. Sara Markowitz & Andrew J. D. Smith, 2024. "Nurse practitioner scope of practice and patient harm: Evidence from medical malpractice payouts and adverse action reports," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 420-445, March.
    14. Christine Sevilla-Dedieu & Nathalie Billaudeau & Morgane Le Guern & Audrey Arnaud & Alain Paraponaris, 2025. "Age In, Age Out: The (Un)intended Consequences of Targeted Screening Programs," AMSE Working Papers 2535, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    15. RoyChoudhury, Agnitra & Petrova, Kameliia, 2023. "Impact of New York state nurse practitioners modernization act on quality of care," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Shishir Shakya & Alicia Plemmons, 2020. "Does Scope of Practice Affect Mobility of Nurse Practitioners Serving Medicare Beneficiaries?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 421-434, December.
    17. Anca M. Grecu & Lee C. Spector, 2019. "Nurse practitioner's independent prescriptive authority and opioids abuse," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(10), pages 1220-1225, October.
    18. Roy Choudhury, Agnitra & Plemmons, Alicia, 2023. "Effects of giving psychologists prescriptive authority: Evidence from a natural experiment in the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Hoagland, Alex & Wang, Guan, 2025. "Prescribing power and equitable access to care: Evidence from pharmacists in Ontario, Canada," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    20. Grossman, Daniel & Ray, Arijit & Wadsworth, Allyssa, 2025. "The pharmacist will see you now: Pharmacist prescribed contraceptives and fertility rates," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:161:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025001526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.