IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v4y2002i4p313-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The National Forest Programme in the light of Austria's law and political culture

Author

Listed:
  • Voitleithner, Johannes

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Voitleithner, Johannes, 2002. "The National Forest Programme in the light of Austria's law and political culture," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 313-322, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:4:y:2002:i:4:p:313-322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(02)00073-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 1999. "Austria's Training Firms," PEB Exchange, Programme on Educational Building 1999/13, OECD Publishing.
    2. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1993. "Positive und negative Koordination in Verhandlungssystemen," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Winkel, Georg & Sotirov, Metodi, 2011. "An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of “new modes of governance” in Germany and Bulgaria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 143-154.
    2. Johansson, Johanna, 2016. "Participation and deliberation in Swedish forest governance: The process of initiating a National Forest Program," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 137-146.
    3. Balest, Jessica & Hrib, Michal & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Paletto, Alessandro, 2018. "The formulation of the National Forest Programme in the Czech Republic: A qualitative survey," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 16-21.
    4. Rahman, Md Saifur & Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Giessen, Lukas, 2016. "Foreign donors driving policy change in recipient countries: Three decades of development aid towards community-based forest policy in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 39-53.
    5. Rahman, Md Saifur & Sarker, Pradip Kumar & Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Giessen, Lukas, 2018. "Policy changes resulting in power changes? Quantitative evidence from 25 years of forest policy development in Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 419-431.
    6. Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Krott, Max, 2012. "Identifying policy change — Analytical program analysis: An example of two decades of forest policy in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 93-99.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zahlner, Kristina, 2002. "Structural changes in the defence industry - opportunity or risk for regional governance capacities?," ERSA conference papers ersa02p089, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Bahn, Christopher, 2002. "Die Bedeutung der lokalen Regulationssysteme in Berlin für den Strukturwandel im Einzelhandel: Ein Untersuchungsdesign," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 02-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Michael Arndt & Thomas Gawron & Petra Jahnke, 2000. "Regional Policy through Co-operation: From Urban Forum to Urban Network," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(11), pages 1903-1923, October.
    4. Wendt, Claus & Rothgang, Heinz, 2007. "Gesundheitssystemtypen im Vergleich: konzeptionelle Überlegungen zur vergleichenden Analyse von Gesundheitssystemen," TranState Working Papers 61, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    5. Reihlen, Markus, 1998. "Die Heterarchie als postbürokratisches Organisationsmodell der Zukunft," Working Paper Series 96, University of Cologne, Department of Business Policy and Logistics.
    6. Dose, Nicolai, 2015. "Ansiedelung von Einzelhandelsgroßprojekten aus governance-analytischer Perspektive: Nutzungskonflikte, institutionelle Lösungen und deren Blockadeanfälligkeit," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Karl, Helmut (ed.), Koordination raumwirksamer Politik: Mehr Effizienz und Wirksamkeit von Politik durch abgestimmte Arbeitsteilung, volume 4, pages 174-192, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    7. Gläser, Jochen, 1998. "Kognitive Neuorientierung der ostdeutschen außeruniversitären Grundlagenforschung als Folge des Institutionentransfers," Discussion Papers, Working Group Transformation of Science Systems P 98-402, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Fürst, Dietrich & Hirschfeld, Markus & Jung, Hans-Ulrich & Lammers, Konrad & Nischwitz, Guido & Salow, Sven-Olaf & Sempell, Guido & Skubowius, Alexander, 2012. "Ausgestaltung der EU-Strukturpolitik der Förderperiode 2007 - 2013 in den nordwestdeutschen Bundesländern," Arbeitsmaterial der ARL, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, volume 127, number 358.
    9. Elsasser, Peter, 2002. "Rules for participation and negotiation and their possible influence on the content of a National Forest Programme," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 291-300, December.
    10. Köck, Wolfgang & Bovet, Jana, 2015. "Koordinierung der Flussgebietsbewirtschaftung: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Abstimmung mit der Raumordnung," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Karl, Helmut (ed.), Koordination raumwirksamer Politik: Mehr Effizienz und Wirksamkeit von Politik durch abgestimmte Arbeitsteilung, volume 4, pages 131-151, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    11. Fürst, Dietrich, 2014. "Kann die Regionalplanung die Raumplanung retten?," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Küpper, Patrick & Levin-Keitel, Meike & Maus, Friederike & Müller, Peter & Reimann, Sara & Sonderman (ed.), Raumentwicklung 3.0 - Gemeinsam die Zukunft der räumlichen Planung gestalten, volume 8, pages 50-61, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    12. Weiss, Gerhard, 2000. "Evaluation of policy instruments for protective forest management in Austria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 243-255, December.
    13. Thomas Risse‐kappen, 1996. "Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 53-80, March.
    14. Helge Torgersen & Jürgen Hampel, 2001. "The Gate-Resonance Model - The interface of policy, media and the public in technology conflicts," ITA manu:scripts 01_03, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    15. Dienel, Hans-Liudger & Geissel, Brigitte & Krüger, Sabine & Walk, Heike, 2001. "Politische Regulierungsformen, Government, Governance und Netzwerkstrukturen auf der globalen, europäischen und nationalen Ebene: Überblicksstudie," Arbeitspapiere 47, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    16. Manow, Philip, 1994. "Strukturinduzierte Politikgleichgewichte: Das Gesundheitsstrukturgesetz (GSG) und seine Vorgänger," MPIfG Discussion Paper 94/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Vetterlein, Antje, 2000. "Verhandelbarkeit von Arbeitszeitverkürzung: Zum Versuch neokorporatistischer Beschäftigungssteuerung im Bündnis für Arbeit," Papers, Research Network Project "Work and Ecology" P 00-517, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    18. Kern, Kristine, 2000. "Institutionelle Arrangements und Formen der Handlungskoordination im Mehrebenensystem der USA," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Standard-setting and Environment FS II 00-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    19. Börzel, Tanja A., 1997. "What's So Special About Policy Networks? An Exploration of the Concept and Its Usefulness in Studying European Governance," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 1, August.
    20. Gluck, Peter & Humphreys, David, 2002. "Research into National Forest Programmes in a European context," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 253-258, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:4:y:2002:i:4:p:313-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.