IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v19y2012icp48-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships between national-park affinity and attitudes towards protected area management of visitors to the Gesaeuse National Park, Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Arnberger, Arne
  • Eder, Renate
  • Allex, Brigitte
  • Sterl, Petra
  • Burns, Robert C.

Abstract

Managing protected areas requires information about the proportion of visitors attracted by the national park label and visitor attitudes towards protected area management. This study explored attitudes of visitor segments towards visitor and environmental management in the Gesaeuse National Park, Austria. The segmentation was based on the degree of visitor affinity to the national park. On-site, face-to-face interviews of 405 visitors were conducted in the national park during the summer and autumn of 2008. Three segments were formed based on their national-park affinity. Two-thirds of the visitors had a low affinity. The proportion of visitors with a low national-park affinity was comparable to other European national parks. The respondents with a low affinity had more negative attitudes towards nature conservation, natural processes, visitor management and the regional economic impact of the Gesaeuse National Park. The study results support national park management in the development of tourism marketing strategies and public awareness campaigns targeted on visitor segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnberger, Arne & Eder, Renate & Allex, Brigitte & Sterl, Petra & Burns, Robert C., 2012. "Relationships between national-park affinity and attitudes towards protected area management of visitors to the Gesaeuse National Park, Austria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 48-55.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:19:y:2012:i:c:p:48-55
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993411100102X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomicevic, Jelena & Shannon, Margaret A. & Milovanovic, Marina, 2010. "Socio-economic impacts on the attitudes towards conservation of natural resources: Case study from Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 157-162, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uta Schirpke & Rocco Scolozzi & Riccardo Da Re & Mauro Masiero & Davide Pellegrino & Davide Marino, 2020. "Enhancing outdoor recreation and biodiversity through payments for ecosystem services: emerging potentials from selected Natura 2000 sites in Italy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2045-2067, March.
    2. Marc Vallverdu-Gordi & Estela Marine-Roig, 2023. "The Role of Graphic Design Semiotics in Environmental Awareness Campaigns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Run Liu & Ziyue Qiu, 2022. "Urban Sustainable Development Empowered by Cultural and Tourism Industries: Using Zhenjiang as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Asif Razzaq & Arshian Sharif & Paiman Ahmad & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2021. "Asymmetric role of tourism development and technology innovation on carbon dioxide emission reduction in the Chinese economy: Fresh insights from QARDL approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 176-193, January.
    5. Remus Ion Hornoiu & Mihaela Ana Padurean & Ana-Maria Nica & Liviu-George Maha, 2014. "Tourism Consumpion Behavior in Natural Protected Areas," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(Special 8), pages 1178-1178, August.
    6. Lidia Blanco-Cerradelo & M. Isabel Diéguez-Castrillón & José Antonio Fraiz-Brea & Ana Gueimonde-Canto, 2022. "Protected Areas and Tourism Resources: Toward Sustainable Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Nuria Rodríguez-López & M. Isabel Diéguez-Castrillón & Ana Gueimonde-Canto, 2019. "Sustainability and Tourism Competitiveness in Protected Areas: State of Art and Future Lines of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-32, November.
    8. Atmiş, Erdoğan, 2018. "A critical review of the (potentially) negative impacts of current protected area policies on the nature conservation of forests in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 675-684.
    9. Ju Hyoung Han & Andy S. Choi & Chi-Ok Oh, 2018. "The Effects of Environmental Value Orientations and Experience-Use History on the Conservation Value of a National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Kyu-Chul Lee & Yong-Hoon Son, 2017. "Exploring Landscape Perceptions of Bukhansan National Park According to the Degree of Visitors’ Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, July.
    11. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Mihajlović, Ivan & Fedajev, Aleksandra & Živković, Živan, 2018. "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 85-95.
    12. Diana E. Dumitras & Iulia C. Muresan & Ionel M. Jitea & Valentin C. Mihai & Simona E. Balazs & Tiberiu Iancu, 2017. "Assessing Tourists’ Preferences for Recreational Trips in National and Natural Parks as a Premise for Long-Term Sustainable Management Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Xu, Feifei & Fox, Dorothy, 2014. "Modelling attitudes to nature, tourism and sustainable development in national parks: A survey of visitors in China and the UK," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 142-158.
    14. Imran, Sophia & Alam, Khorshed & Beaumont, Narelle, 2014. "Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 290-299.
    15. O. Digun-Aweto & O.P. Fawole, 2016. "Attitude Of Tourists Towards Ecotourism At Okomu National Park, Nigeria," Tourism Research Institute, Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 15(1), pages 33-51, June.
    16. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Živković, Živan, 2017. "Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 11-26.
    17. Rastogi, Archi & Hickey, Gordon M. & Anand, Anupam & Badola, Ruchi & Hussain, Syed Ainul, 2015. "Wildlife-tourism, local communities and tiger conservation: A village-level study in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 11-19.
    18. Leask, Anna, 2016. "Visitor attraction management: A critical review of research 2009–2014," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 334-361.
    19. Mayer Marius & Job Hubert, 2014. "The economics of protected areas – a European perspective," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 73-97, October.
    20. Veronika Piscová & Michal Ševčík & Juraj Hreško & František Petrovič, 2021. "Effects of a Short-Term Trampling Experiment on Alpine Vegetation in the Tatras, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    21. Else Ragni Yttredal & Nathalie Homlong, 2020. "Perception of Sustainable Development in a Local World Heritage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    22. Moyle, Brent D. & Scherrer, Pascal & Weiler, Betty & Wilson, Erica & Caldicott, Rod & Nielsen, Noah, 2017. "Assessing preferences of potential visitors for nature-based experiences in protected areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 29-41.
    23. Schirpke, Uta & Meisch, Claude & Marsoner, Thomas & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2018. "Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 336-350.
    24. Rommelfanger, Jan, 2023. "Management of German national parks: The role of institutions and actors in defining goals and making decisions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qun Liu & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Wang, 2017. "Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Irena Medar-Tanjga & Neda Živak & Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski & Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Vukosava Čolić, 2022. "Drina Transboundary Biosphere Reserve—Opportunities and Challenges of Sustainable Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Ayhan Akyol & Türkay Türkoğlu & Sultan Bekiroğlu & Ahmet Tolunay, 2018. "Resident perceptions of livelihood impacts arising from the Kızıldağ National Park, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1037-1052, June.
    4. Masud, Muhammad Mehedi & Kari, Fatimah Binti, 2015. "Community attitudes towards environmental conservation behaviour: An empirical investigation within MPAs, Malaysia," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 138-144.
    5. Patricia Carignano Torres & Carla Morsello & Luke Parry & Renata Pardini, 2016. "Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Rodríguez-Ortega, Tamara & Bernués, Alberto & Alfnes, Frode, 2016. "Psychographic profile affects willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean high nature value farmland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 232-245.
    7. Sirivongs, Khamfeua & Tsuchiya, Toshiyuki, 2012. "Relationship between local residents' perceptions, attitudes and participation towards national protected areas: A case study of Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area, central Lao PDR," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 92-100.
    8. Gebregziabher, Dawit & Soltani, Arezoo, 2019. "Exclosures in people’s minds: perceptions and attitudes in the Tigray region, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Digun-Aweto Oghenetejiri & Ayodele Ibukun Augustine & Fawole Ogbanero Pipy, 2015. "Attitude of Local Dwellers towards Ecotourism in the Okomu National Park, Edo State Nigeria," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 103-115, December.
    10. Järv Henri & Kliimask Jaak & Ward Raymond & Sepp Kalev, 2016. "Socioeconomic Impacts of Protection Status on Residents of National Parks," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 67-85, June.
    11. Jovana Brankov & Jasna Micić & Jelena Ćalić & Jelena Kovačević-Majkić & Ranko Milanović & Tamás Telbisz, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward Protected Areas: The Case of Tara National Park (Serbia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Chiedza Ngonidzashe Mutanga & Never Muboko & Edson Gandiwa, 2017. "Protected area staff and local community viewpoints: A qualitative assessment of conservation relationships in Zimbabwe," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:19:y:2012:i:c:p:48-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.