IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16733-d1002593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drina Transboundary Biosphere Reserve—Opportunities and Challenges of Sustainable Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Irena Medar-Tanjga

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Banja Luka, Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Neda Živak

    (Department of Spatial Planning, Faculty of Science, University of Banja Luka, Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski

    (Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Vesna Rajčević

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Banja Luka, Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Tanja Mišlicki Tomić

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Banja Luka, Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Vukosava Čolić

    (Department of Spatial Planning, Faculty of Science, University of Banja Luka, Mladena Stojanovića 2, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Abstract

This study aims to explore the opportunities and challenges of sustainable conservation in the Drina Transboundary Biosphere Reserve (TBR Drina). Two countries in 2004 launched activities on the designation of TBR Drina, which would make a unique territorial system of Tara National Park (NP Tara) in the Republic of Serbia and Drina National Park (NP Drina) in the Republic of Srpska/Bosnia and Herzegovina. Through the analysis of institutional and legal jurisdiction, the authors presented the management system of protected areas in both countries, with detailed insight into the specific mechanisms of government functioning and management in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Its complex state apparatus represents the biggest limiting factor for the formation of TBR Drina. Through qualitative research, the researched area’s natural, cultural-historical, and socio-economic potentials were identified and recommendations were made for their optimal valorization and utilization. Research has shown that the natural, cultural-historical conditions of TBR Drina represent the potential for development, in contrast to the socio-economic conditions that make up its limiting factor. By planning through the cooperation between the border regions of both countries through support at the state level, TBR Drina can be recovered gradually, with the relative coexistence of ecological, social, and economic components of space, in the forthcoming period.

Suggested Citation

  • Irena Medar-Tanjga & Neda Živak & Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski & Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Vukosava Čolić, 2022. "Drina Transboundary Biosphere Reserve—Opportunities and Challenges of Sustainable Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16733-:d:1002593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16733/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16733/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joaquin Romano & Emilio Pérez-Chinarro & Byron V. Coral, 2020. "Network of Landscapes in the Sustainable Management of Transboundary Biosphere Reserves," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Todd Hataley & Christian Leuprecht, 2018. "Determinants of Cross-Border Cooperation," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 317-328, July.
    3. Tomicevic, Jelena & Shannon, Margaret A. & Milovanovic, Marina, 2010. "Socio-economic impacts on the attitudes towards conservation of natural resources: Case study from Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 157-162, March.
    4. Jovana Brankov & Jasna Micić & Jelena Ćalić & Jelena Kovačević-Majkić & Ranko Milanović & Tamás Telbisz, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward Protected Areas: The Case of Tara National Park (Serbia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Richard P. Cincotta & Jennifer Wisnewski & Robert Engelman, 2000. "Human population in the biodiversity hotspots," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6781), pages 990-992, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Irena Medar-Tanjga & Mlađen Trifunović & Neda Živak & Aleksandra Petrašević, 2023. "The Role of Landscape in Sustainable Tourism Development—A Study of Identification and Evaluation of Landscape Qualities of the Vrbanja Basin in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaiswal, Sreeja & Balietti, Anca & Schäffer, Daniel, 2023. "Environmental Protection and Labor Market Composition," Working Papers 0736, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    2. Fisher, Brendan & Christopher, Treg, 2007. "Poverty and biodiversity: Measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 93-101, April.
    3. Qun Liu & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Wang, 2017. "Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Johnston, Robert J. & Ramachandran, Mahesh & Schultz, Eric T. & Segerson, Kathleen & Besedin, Elena Y., 2011. "Characterizing Spatial Pattern in Ecosystem Service Values when Distance Decay Doesn’t Apply: Choice Experiments and Local Indicators of Spatial Association," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103374, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Arnberger, Arne & Eder, Renate & Allex, Brigitte & Sterl, Petra & Burns, Robert C., 2012. "Relationships between national-park affinity and attitudes towards protected area management of visitors to the Gesaeuse National Park, Austria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 48-55.
    6. Ayhan Akyol & Türkay Türkoğlu & Sultan Bekiroğlu & Ahmet Tolunay, 2018. "Resident perceptions of livelihood impacts arising from the Kızıldağ National Park, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1037-1052, June.
    7. Sara T Borgström, 2009. "Patterns and Challenges of Urban Nature Conservation—A Study of Southern Sweden," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2671-2685, November.
    8. Caitlin Cunningham & Karen F. Beazley, 2018. "Changes in Human Population Density and Protected Areas in Terrestrial Global Biodiversity Hotspots, 1995–2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Masud, Muhammad Mehedi & Kari, Fatimah Binti, 2015. "Community attitudes towards environmental conservation behaviour: An empirical investigation within MPAs, Malaysia," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 138-144.
    10. Parkhurst, Gregory M. & Shogren, Jason F., 2007. "Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 344-355, December.
    11. Christina Breed & Helge Mehrtens, 2021. "Using “Live” Public Sector Projects in Design Teaching to Transform Urban Green Infrastructure in South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Xiaoqian Sun & Sebastian Wandelt & Mark Hansen, 2020. "Airport Road Access at Planet Scale using Population Grid and Openstreetmap," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 273-299, March.
    13. Hopper, Stephen D., 2010. "Sir John Crawford Memorial Address: Plant Diversity at the Turning Point," 2010: Biodiversity and World Food Security: Nourishing the Planet and Its People, 30 August-1 September 2010 125259, Crawford Fund.
    14. Maryna Tverdostup & Tiiu Paas & Mariia Chebotareva, 2022. "What Can Support Cross-Border Cooperation in the Blue Economy? Lessons from Blue Sector Performance Analysis in Estonia and Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Patricia Carignano Torres & Carla Morsello & Luke Parry & Renata Pardini, 2016. "Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Snyder, Brian, 2008. "How to reach a compromise on drilling in AWNR," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 937-939, March.
    17. Jonathan O. Hernandez & Inocencio E. Buot & Byung Bae Park, 2022. "Prioritizing Choices in the Conservation of Flora and Fauna: Research Trends and Methodological Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Mathew E. Hauer & Carl P. Schmertmann, 2020. "Population Pyramids Yield Accurate Estimates of Total Fertility Rates," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(1), pages 221-241, February.
    19. Robert Johnston & Mahesh Ramachandran, 2014. "Modeling Spatial Patchiness and Hot Spots in Stated Preference Willingness to Pay," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(3), pages 363-387, November.
    20. Valentina CORNEA, 2020. "The Contribution Of Cohesion Policy In The „Lower Danube” Euroregion: The Mapping Of The Implemented Projects’ Outputs And Their Implication To Transition For Sustainability," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 189-208.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16733-:d:1002593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.