IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v92y2022ics0149718922000179.html

Effectiveness of strategy implementation and e-governance performance

Author

Listed:
  • Suri, Pradeep Kumar
  • Sushil,

Abstract

E-governance projects generally face many planning and implementation related challenges. It is well acknowledged that the complexities involved ask for adequate strategic planning before launching these projects. However, it is observed that many times even the well-planned e-governance projects may not perform as per expectations due to ineffective strategy implementation. This could perhaps be one of the causes of the unsatisfactory performance of e-governance projects, particularly in the context of developing countries, as reported by some studies. The article attempts to analyze the effectiveness of strategy implementation and performance of e-governance based on a study of a few agriculture related e-governance projects in India. Suitable measures and hypotheses have been conceptualized for studying the effectiveness of strategy implementation and e-governance performance. The empirical support is provided by a survey of operational level officers involved in the implementation of projects. The analysis has brought out four constituents of the construct ‘effectiveness of strategy implementation’ which has been revealed as a predictor of ‘performance of e-governance'. The study findings are expected to contribute in terms of giving more thrust to identified factors of strategy implementation while planning for e-governance initiatives. The findings may also trigger corrective actions in several such ongoing projects which are struggling to deliver the intended outcomes. Overall, the research based interventions by practitioners may lead to better performance of e-governance projects for the benefit of society at large.

Suggested Citation

  • Suri, Pradeep Kumar & Sushil,, 2022. "Effectiveness of strategy implementation and e-governance performance," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:92:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Premkumar & William R. King, 1994. "Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 75-109, June.
    2. Rajiv Sabherwal & Anand Jeyaraj & Charles Chowa, 2006. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    3. Ashaye, Olusoyi Richard & Irani, Zahir, 2019. "The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 253-270.
    4. Aisson Lawson-Body & Jared Keengwe & Laurence Mukankusi & Abdou Illia & Glen Miller, 2008. "E-Government Service Delivery Performance: An Adaptation of the Balanced Scorecard to the Public Sector," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 11-28, April.
    5. Peter Kawalek & David Wastall, 2005. "Pursuing Radical Transformation in Information Age Government: Case Studies Using the SPRINT Methodology," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 79-101, January.
    6. Chee-Wee Tan & Shan L. Pan & Eric T.K. Lim, 2005. "Managing Stakeholder Interests in e-Government Implementation: Lessons Learned from a Singapore e-Government Project," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 31-53, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. King, William R. & Teo, Thompson S. H., 2000. "Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 667-679, December.
    2. repec:osf:inarxi:5cbx3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Yadav, Sanjeev & Kumar, Anil & Majumdar, Abhijit & Luthra, Sunil & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2023. "The influence of artificial intelligence techniques on disruption management: Does supply chain dynamism matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Becker, Jan U. & Greve, Goetz & Albers, Sönke, 2009. "The impact of technological and organizational implementation of CRM on customer acquisition, maintenance, and retention," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 207-215.
    5. Demian Abrego-Almazán & Yesenia Sánchez-Tovar & José M. Medina-Quintero, 2017. "Influencia de los sistemas de información en los resultados organizacionales," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(2), pages 3-4, Abril-Jun.
    6. Nien-Ping Chen & Kao-Yi Shen & Chiung-Ju Liang, 2021. "Hybrid Decision Model for Evaluating Blockchain Business Strategy: A Bank’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Sunday C. Eze & Vera C. A. Chinedu-Eze & Hart O. Awa, 2021. "Key Success Factors (KSFs) Underlying the Adoption of Social Media Marketing Technology," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    8. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    9. Christian Theres & Stefan Strohmeier, 2024. "Consolidating the theoretical foundations of digital human resource management acceptance and use research: a meta-analytic validation of UTAUT," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2683-2715, December.
    10. Hamza Cherkaoui Rhazouani & Jihane Chouay & Hassan El Aissaoui & Hamid Ait Lemqeddem, 2023. "Digitalisation et le Nouveau Management Public," Post-Print hal-04246269, HAL.
    11. David, Sofia & Zinica, Daniel & Bărbuță-Mișu, Nicoleta & Savga, Larisa & Virlanuta, Florina-Oana, 2024. "Public administration managers' and employees' perceptions of adaptability to change under “the future of work” paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. repec:iis:dispap:iiisdp402 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Stephen J. Childe & Thanos Papadopoulos & Zongwei Luo & David Roubaud, 2020. "Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company’s sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers’ perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 343-367, July.
    14. Lahuddin, Harlinda & Modding, H. Basri & Semmaila, H. Baharuddin & Lamo, H. Muchtar & Jamali, Hisnol, 2018. "Effect of management support and user participation on implementation of information systems success and undergraduate programs performance," INA-Rxiv 5cbx3, Center for Open Science.
    15. Rosnita Wirdiyanti & Inka Yusgiantoro & Agus Sugiarto & Aprillia Dwi Harjanti & Indra Yudha Mambea & Subiakto Soekarno & Sylviana Maya Damayanti, 2023. "How does e-commerce adoption impact micro, small, and medium enterprises’ performance and financial inclusion? Evidence from Indonesia," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2485-2515, December.
    16. Lahuddin, Harlinda & Gani, Ahmad & Nujum, Syamsu & Modding, H. Basri & Jamali, Hisnol, 2018. "Effect of management support and user participation on implementation of information systems success and undergraduate programs performance," INA-Rxiv p7fm4, Center for Open Science.
    17. Teo, Thompson S.H. & Koh, Tat Koon, 2010. "Lessons from multi-agency information management projects: Case of the Online Business Licensing Service (OBLS) Project, Singapore," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 85-93.
    18. Hamari, Juho & Keronen, Lauri, 2017. "Why do people play games? A meta-analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 125-141.
    19. Catherine L. Wang, 2008. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(4), pages 635-657, July.
    20. Ravi Seethamraju, 2005. "Enterprise Resource Planning Systems — Implications for Managers and Management," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(37), pages 90-96, November.
    21. Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2023. "Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.
    22. Yogesh K Dwivedi & Elvira Ismagilova & Prianka Sarker & Anand Jeyaraj & Yassine Jadil & Laurie Hughes, 2023. "A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model for Understanding Social Commerce Adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1421-1437, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:92:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.