IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v56y2016icp56-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic approach to an organization’s sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Schalock, Robert L.
  • Verdugo, Miguel
  • Lee, Tim

Abstract

This article integrates the concepts of sustainability and quality improvement into a systematic approach to an organization’s sustainability. The article: (a) presents a literature-based model that incorporates the factors that drive an organization’s sustainability; (b) describes how sustainability is operationalized through a systematic approach to quality improvement; (c) discusses the advantages of a systematic approach to sustainability; and (d) shares with the reader literature and experientially-based lessons learned about the approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel & Lee, Tim, 2016. "A systematic approach to an organization’s sustainability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 56-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:56-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718915300574
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simmons, Vani Nath & Klasko, Lynne B. & Fleming, Khaliah & Koskan, Alexis M. & Jackson, Nia T. & Noel-Thomas, Shalewa & Luque, John S. & Vadaparampil, Susan T. & Lee, Ji-Hyun & Quinn, Gwendolyn P. & B, 2015. "Participatory evaluation of a community–academic partnership to inform capacity-building and sustainability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 19-26.
    2. Levine, Roger & Russ-Eft, Darlene & Burling, Andrea & Stephens, Jennifer & Downey, Joanna, 2013. "Evaluating health services research capacity building programs: Implications for health services and human resource development," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Hansen, Mark & Alkin, Marvin C. & Wallace, Tanner LeBaron, 2013. "Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 34-43.
    4. Schuh, Russell G. & Leviton, Laura C., 2006. "A framework to assess the development and capacity of non-profit agencies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 171-179, May.
    5. Sutherland, Stephanie & Katz, Steven, 2005. "Concept mapping methodology: A catalyst for organizational learning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 257-269, August.
    6. Lick, Dale W., 2006. "A new perspective on organizational learning: Creating learning teams," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 88-96, February.
    7. Pluye, Pierre & Potvin, Louise & Denis, Jean-Louis & Pelletier, Jocelyne & Mannoni, Chantal, 2005. "Program sustainability begins with the first events," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 123-137, May.
    8. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    9. W-H Tsai & W-C Chou & W Hsu, 2009. "The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: an effective MCDM model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1396-1410, October.
    10. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Hart, Rebecca E. & Townsend, Shannon H. & Gagné, Marc, 2011. "Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 228-235, August.
    11. Kapucu, Naim & Healy, Bridget F. & Arslan, Tolga, 2011. "Survival of the fittest: Capacity building for small nonprofit organizations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 236-245, August.
    12. Wu, Hung-Yi & Lin, Yi-Kuei & Chang, Chi-Hsiang, 2011. "Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 37-50, February.
    13. Luskin, Rebecca J.C. & Ho, Timothy, 2013. "Comparing the intended consequences of three theories of evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 61-66.
    14. Scheirer, Mary Ann & Hartling, Gretchen & Hagerman, Diane, 2008. "Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: Illustrations from an on-line survey," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 335-346, November.
    15. Johnson, Knowlton & Hays, Carol & Center, Hayden & Daley, Charlotte, 2004. "Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 135-149, May.
    16. Sangkyun Kim, 2015. "Interdisciplinary Approaches and Methods for Sustainable Transformation and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    17. Hunter, David E.K., 2006. "Using a theory of change approach to build organizational strength, capacity and sustainability with not-for-profit organizations in the human services sector," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 193-200, May.
    18. Patton, Michael Quinn & Horton, Douglas, 2008. "Utilization-focused evaluation for agricultural innovation," ILAC Briefs 52533, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nielsen, Steffen Bohni & Lemire, Sebastian & Bourgeois, Isabelle & Fierro, Leslie A., 2023. "Mapping the evaluation capacity building landscape: A bibliometric analysis of scholarly communities and themes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Bassam Buhusayen & Pi-Shen Seet & Alan Coetzer, 2021. "Front-Line Management during Radical Organisational Change: Social Exchange and Paradox Interpretations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Waqas Nawaz & Muammer Koç, 2019. "Exploring Organizational Sustainability: Themes, Functional Areas, and Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-36, August.
    4. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel Angel & van Loon, Jos, 2018. "Understanding organization transformation in evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    5. Ana Rodríguez-Olalla & Carmen Avilés-Palacios, 2017. "Integrating Sustainability in Organisations: An Activity-Based Sustainability Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    2. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel Angel & van Loon, Jos, 2018. "Understanding organization transformation in evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    3. Douglas S. Gardner & Jacob M. Marszalek, 2014. "Does the Sustainability of Comprehensive Intervention Programs Depend on Parent Involvement?," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, August.
    4. Alfonso, Moya L. & Nickelson, Jen & Hogeboom, David L. & French, Jennifer & Bryant, Carol A. & McDermott, Robert J. & Baldwin, Julie A., 2008. "Assessing local capacity for health intervention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 145-159, May.
    5. Riki Savaya & Gerald Elsworth & Patricia Rogers, 2009. "Projected Sustainability of Innovative Social Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 189-205, April.
    6. Wu, Huang & Shen, Jianping & Jones, Jeffrey & Gao, Xingyuan & Zheng, Yunzheng & Krenn, Huilan Y., 2019. "Using logic model and visualization to conduct portfolio evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 69-75.
    7. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Go, Sodam & Zinzow, Heidi & Gray, Aracelis & Gutierrez Barrett, Melissa, 2007. "Analysis of strategic plans to assess planning for sustainability of comprehensive community initiatives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 105-113, February.
    8. Murphy Haley & Robichau Robbie Waters, 2016. "Governmental Influences on Organizational Capacity: The Case of Child Welfare Nonprofits," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 339-367, September.
    9. Perkins, Daniel F. & Feinberg, Mark E. & Greenberg, Mark T. & Johnson, Lesley E. & Chilenski, Sarah Meyer & Mincemoyer, Claudia C. & Spoth, Richard L., 2011. "Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 283-291, August.
    10. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Cristian Eugen Luchian & Iuliana Luchian, 2018. "Community Based Programs Sustainability. A Multidimensional Analysis of Sustainability Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Miller, Robin Lin, 2013. "Logic models: A useful way to study theories of evaluation practice?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 77-80.
    12. Cousins, J. Bradley, 2013. "When does a conceptual framework become a theory? Reflections from an accidental theorist," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 67-70.
    13. Dillman, Lisa M., 2013. "Comparing evaluation activities across multiple theories of practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 53-60.
    14. Mark, Melvin M. & Henry, Gary T., 2013. "Logic models and content analyses for the explication of evaluation theories: The case of emergent realist evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 74-76.
    15. Varmazyar, Mohsen & Dehghanbaghi, Maryam & Afkhami, Mehdi, 2016. "A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 125-140.
    16. Scheirer, Mary Ann & Hartling, Gretchen & Hagerman, Diane, 2008. "Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: Illustrations from an on-line survey," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 335-346, November.
    17. Gargani, John, 2013. "What can practitioners learn from theorists’ logic models?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 81-88.
    18. Iniesta, Julián & Verdugo, Miguel A. & Schalock, Robert L., 2023. "Organizational change and evidence-based practices in support services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Jacobson, Miriam R. & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "The effects of stakeholder involvement on perceptions of an evaluation’s credibility," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 64-73.
    20. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu, 2019. "Community-Based Healthcare Programs Sustainability Impact on the Sustainability of Host Organizations: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:56-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.