IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v106y2024ics0149718924000636.html

Effectiveness of portfolio assessment in primary education: A multi-complementary research approach

Author

Listed:
  • Doğan, Yunus
  • Yıldırım, Nazife Tuğba
  • Batdı, Veli

Abstract

The current study represents a comprehensive exploration of the efficacy of portfolio assessment within primary school contexts, employing a Multi-Complementary Research (McA) framework comprising three distinct stages. In the pre-complementary knowledge stage, data collection commenced utilizing the document analysis method, concurrently conducting meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis. From 18 studies, a meta-analysis of 23 datasets revealed a medium-level overall effect size. Simultaneously, meta-thematic analysis was conducted on 6 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, analyzing themes and codes through content analysis. Transitioning to the post-complementary knowledge stage, an experimental study employing a pretest-posttest control group design was undertaken with third-grade primary school students. Additionally, thematic analysis based on participant perspectives was conducted. Subsequently, an eventual complementary knowledge stage was achieved by synthesizing findings from the initial two stages. Key themes emerged, titled "the effect of portfolio use in primary education on academic success, 21st century skills, and attitudes." The collective findings indicate that portfolio assessment in primary schools yields positive effects across all three identified themes.

Suggested Citation

  • Doğan, Yunus & Yıldırım, Nazife Tuğba & Batdı, Veli, 2024. "Effectiveness of portfolio assessment in primary education: A multi-complementary research approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000636
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000636
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sue Duval & Richard Tweedie, 2000. "Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 455-463, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucheon Kim & Songyi Lee, 2023. "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Non-Face-to-Face Coaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0171654 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zuzana Irsova & Hristos Doucouliagos & Tomas Havranek & T. D. Stanley, 2024. "Meta‐analysis of social science research: A practitioner's guide," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1547-1566, December.
    4. Qian Li & Yan Chen & Shikun Sun & Muyuan Zhu & Jing Xue & Zihan Gao & Jinfeng Zhao & Yihe Tang, 2022. "Research on Crop Irrigation Schedules Under Deficit Irrigation—A Meta-analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4799-4817, September.
    5. Bart Verkuil & Serpil Atasayi & Marc L Molendijk, 2015. "Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Damiano Pizzol & Mike Trott & Igor Grabovac & Mario Antunes & Anna Claudia Colangelo & Simona Ippoliti & Cristian Petre Ilie & Anne Carrie & Nicola Veronese & Lee Smith, 2021. "Laparoscopy in Low-Income Countries: 10-Year Experience and Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Ferrero, Marta & Vadillo, Miguel A. & León, Samuel P., 2021. "A valid evaluation of the theory of multiple intelligences is not yet possible: Problems of methodological quality for intervention studies," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Wolfgang Goymann & John C. Wingfield, 2014. "Male-to-female testosterone ratios, dimorphism, and life history—what does it really tell us?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 685-699.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0204887 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Zhigang Chen & Jiye Zhu & Chaoyuan Huang & Fang Lian & Guobin Wu & Yinnong Zhao, 2015. "The Association between Three Cyclooxygenase-2 Polymorphisms and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Ünal, Zehra E. & Kartal, Gamze & Ulusoy, Serra & Ala, Aslı M. & Yilmaz, Munube & Geary, David C., 2023. "Relative contributions of g and basic domain-specific mathematics skills to complex mathematics competencies," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Jo Smith & Xiao Qi Ang & Emma L. Giles & Gemma Traviss-Turner, 2023. "Emotional Eating Interventions for Adults Living with Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Chryssoula Chatzigeorgiou & Evangelos Christou & Ioanna Simeli, 2025. "From Brochures to Bytes: Destination Branding through Social, Mobile, and AI—A Systematic Narrative Review with Meta-Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-57, September.
    14. Daniele Zago & Maria Eugênia Andrighetto Canozzi & Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos, 2020. "Pregnant beef cow’s nutrition and its effects on postnatal weight and carcass quality of their progeny," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Jenny Jing Wen Liu & Natalie Ein & Julia Gervasio & Mira Battaion & Kenneth Fung, 2022. "The Pursuit of Resilience: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Resilience-Promoting Interventions," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1771-1791, April.
    16. Peiyu Ge & Tomoki SEKIGUCHI, 2026. "A Meta-Analysis of Perceived Overqualification: Resource-Based Mechanisms with Cultural Moderators," Discussion papers e-25-012, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    17. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    18. Xiao Yan Chen & Camilla K. M. Lo & Ko Ling Chan & Wing Cheong Leung & Patrick Ip, 2022. "Association between Childhood Exposure to Family Violence and Telomere Length: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Hsiu-Man Lin & Yu-Tzu Chang & Meng-Hsiang Chen & Shu-Tsen Liu & Bo-Shen Chen & Lin Li & Chiao-Yu Lee & Yu-Ru Sue & Tsai-Mei Sung & Cheuk-Kwan Sun & Pin-Yang Yeh, 2022. "Structural and Functional Neural Correlates in Individuals with Excessive Smartphone Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Gundula Krack, 2019. "How to make value-based health insurance designs more effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 841-856, August.
    21. Shamima Akter & Md. Mizanur Rahman & Thomas Rouyard & Sarmin Aktar & Raïssa Shiyghan Nsashiyi & Ryota Nakamura, 2024. "A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(12), pages 2367-2391, December.
    22. Leonie Kuen & Daniel Westmattelmann & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Who earns trust in online environments? A meta-analysis of trust in technology and trust in provider for technology acceptance," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.