Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Lei
- Jia, Wei
- Li, Hongyang
- Ma, Yanan
- An, Guangyao
- Lang, Jinhua
- Yuan, Wei
Abstract
The supercritical CO2 (sCO2) Brayton cycle has garnered considerable attention for its compact equipment, low compression-power, and high efficiency. The centrifugal compressor serves as the cycle's pivotal component. However, conventional one-dimensional (1D) loss models previously developed for air compressors could not be suitable for sCO2 compressors. In this paper, a loss quantification strategy based on the entropy-generation is presented to optimize empirical coefficients of 1D loss models. Firstly, flow losses in both air and sCO2 compressors are predicted using empirical loss models. Secondly, the distribution of entropy-generation rate in various regions of both air and sCO2 compressors is quantified by three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations with validated by experimental data. Thirdly, air compressors' empirical coefficients are correlated with the distribution of entropy-generation rate. Finally, modified coefficients for sCO2 compressors are proposed using the entropy-generation rate distribution and the presented correlation. Results show that for the air compressor, relative errors between 1D and 3D loss-weight coefficients remained within 5 % for most loss mechanisms, while for the sCO2 compressor, the incidence loss coefficient deviates by up to −22 % caused by overestimating losses when using empirical coefficients. After modifying coefficients of loss models for sCO2 compressors, the prediction error of total-pressure-ratio decreased from about 1.8 % to 0.6 %. Presented coefficients and strategy are suitable for sCO2 compressors to improve prediction accuracy and extend operating range of empirical loss models.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Lei & Jia, Wei & Li, Hongyang & Ma, Yanan & An, Guangyao & Lang, Jinhua & Yuan, Wei, 2026.
"Improved loss evaluation models for sCO2 centrifugal compressors based on qualitative and quantitative analysis,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:346:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226003348
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140232
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:346:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226003348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.