IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v328y2025ics036054422502300x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of battery state-of-charge estimation using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy by different machine learning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Yongjun
  • Jiang, Bo
  • Chen, Qinpin
  • Wang, Xueyuan
  • Wei, Xuezhe
  • Dai, Haifeng

Abstract

Battery state-of-charge (SOC) estimation is an essential function of the battery management system. Most of the current data-driven SOC estimation methods are characterized by voltage or current. Estimating the battery SOC based on battery impedance is an important and emerging technique. This article makes a detailed and specific comparison and discusses impedance-driven SOC estimation methods. First, this article collected four electrochemical impedance spectroscopy datasets that covered different battery types and capacities. Secondly, four commonly used machine learning models and three types of feature extraction strategies are employed to estimate SOC for each dataset. Finally, the SOC estimation results of a single dataset are evaluated in terms of accuracy metrics and computational complexity. At the same time, the performance rank is used to evaluate the models among datasets. The result indicates that the dense neural network model has the highest accuracy metrics but has the largest computational complexity. The generalized linear regression model has the smallest computational complexity but the lowest accuracy metrics. The random forest regression and Gaussian process regression models are more suitable for online scenarios that require faster speed and less memory due to their relatively high accuracy metrics and low computational complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Yongjun & Jiang, Bo & Chen, Qinpin & Wang, Xueyuan & Wei, Xuezhe & Dai, Haifeng, 2025. "A comparative study of battery state-of-charge estimation using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy by different machine learning methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:328:y:2025:i:c:s036054422502300x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422502300X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:328:y:2025:i:c:s036054422502300x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.