IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v328y2025ics0360544225022509.html

Multi-dimensional performance evaluation of straw heat utilization scenarios based on transportation and boiler type

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Tong
  • Wei, Guoxia
  • Liu, Hanqiao
  • Zhu, Yuwen
  • Gong, Yongyue
  • Liu, Tong
  • Zhang, Youcheng

Abstract

Biomass energy utilization is one of the effective technological ways to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality. Different scenarios for heat utilization of straw in China, namely straw pellet fuel boiler for heating, straw gasifier for cogeneration and straw direct combustion boilers for cogeneration (circulating fluidized bed, water-cooled vibrating grate and combined grate) and were evaluated and compared by energy flow analysis (EFA), life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methods. The system boundary includes two stages: (Ⅰ) straw collection, processing and transportation; (Ⅱ) straw energy conversion. EFA results show that the heat utilization efficiency of corn straw direct combustion cogeneration scenarios is 35.50 %–39.81 %, which is higher than the 30.13 % of the gasification cogeneration scenarios. LCA results show that the straw direct combustion cogeneration scenarios is more environmentally friendly, in which the combined grate exhibits the lowest environmental impact with an ECER value of −2.8 × 10−9. LCC results show that the combined grate scenario has the lowest economic cost of −165.05 RMB, but the payback time as 16 years. The straw heating scenario has the highest economic cost of −66.89 RMB, but it only takes 7 years to break even. Overall, combined grate cogeneration is more environmentally friendly, but less economically sustainable. Transportation accounts for 2.3 %–3.8 % of the environmental impact throughout the entire lifecycle and increases with factory scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Tong & Wei, Guoxia & Liu, Hanqiao & Zhu, Yuwen & Gong, Yongyue & Liu, Tong & Zhang, Youcheng, 2025. "Multi-dimensional performance evaluation of straw heat utilization scenarios based on transportation and boiler type," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:328:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225022509
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225022509
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng, Guishi & Zhao, Ying & Pan, Shijiu & Wang, Xiaoqiang & Dong, Changqing, 2020. "A comparative life cycle analysis of wheat straw utilization modes in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    3. Liu, Yigang & Li, Guoxuan & Chen, Zhengrun & Shen, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Hongru & Wang, Shuai & Qi, Jianguang & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Wang, Yinglong & Gao, Jun, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of environmental impacts and energy consumption of biomass-to-methanol and coal-to-methanol via life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Parascanu, M.M. & Puig-Gamero, M. & Soreanu, G. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2019. "Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Liu, Hanqiao & Qiao, Haoyu & Liu, Shiqi & Wei, Guoxia & Zhao, Hailong & Li, Kai & Weng, Fangkai, 2023. "Energy, environment and economy assessment of sewage sludge incineration technologies in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Ruihang & Cai, Benan & Guo, Zaimin & Yang, Dehua & Che, Xunjian & Wang, Haijun & Cai, Weihua, 2025. "Thermodynamic analysis and life cycle assessment of three hydrogen-based polygeneration systems for co-producing power and freshwater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    2. Tianheng Jiang & Maomao Wang & Wei Zhang & Cheng Zhu & Feijuan Wang, 2024. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in China: Current Status, Risk Assessment and Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Giuseppe Maggiotto & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2023. "Thermochemical Technologies for the Optimization of Olive Wood Biomass Energy Exploitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Elfeky, Amal & Abdallah, Mohamed & Fattah, Kazi & Abdeljaber, Abdulrahman, 2026. "A socio-eco-efficiency analysis of waste-to-energy strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Zhou, Xin & Yan, Hao & Sun, Zongzhuang & Feng, Xiang & Zhao, Hui & Liu, Yibin & Chen, Xiaobo & Yang, Chaohe, 2021. "Opportunities for utilizing waste cooking oil in crude to petrochemical process: Novel process design, optimal strategy, techno-economic analysis and life cycle society-environment assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Zhang, Runqi & Yin, Kexin & Wei, Ranran & Ruan, Jiuxu & Yang, Jingwei & Wang, Shuai & Wang, Yinglong, 2025. "Comprehensive analysis of life cycle energy consumption and environmental impact of hydrogen production process via plasma co-gasification of coal and biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    7. Yin, Kexin & Wei, Ranran & Ruan, Jiuxu & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Wang, Yinglong & Zhao, Xinling, 2023. "Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of surgical mask from production to recycling into hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    8. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    10. Li, Jiaxuan & Zhu, Xun & Djilali, Ned & Yang, Yang & Ye, Dingding & Chen, Rong & Liao, Qiang, 2022. "Comparative well-to-pump assessment of fueling pathways for zero-carbon transportation in China: Hydrogen economy or methanol economy?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Zhou, Huairong & Cao, Abo & Meng, Wenliang & Wang, Dongliang & Li, Guixian & Yang, Siyu, 2024. "Process integration and analysis of coupling solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) and CO2 to methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    12. Jozami, Emiliano & Mele, Fernando D & Piastrellini, Roxana & Civit, Bárbara M & Feldman, Susana R, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of bioenergy from lignocellulosic herbaceous biomass: The case study of Spartina argentinensis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    13. Yao, Tianfu & Song, Junnian & Xing, Jiahao & Yang, Wei, 2025. "Water-energy-waste metabolic integration unlocks co-benefits in China's food processing sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    14. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2021. "Industrial gasification systems (>3 MWth) for bioenergy in Europe: Current status and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Nariê Rinke Dias de Souza & Alexandre Souza & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Thayse Aparecida Dourado Hernandes & Otávio Cavalett, 2022. "Addressing the contributions of electricity from biomass in Brazil in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals using life cycle assessment methods," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 980-995, June.
    16. Edwin Espinel Blanco & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Combining Energy Management Indicators and Life Cycle Assessment Indicators to Promote Sustainability in a Paper Production Plant," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Lee, Boreum & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of H2 energy storage system based on renewable energy certificate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 91-98.
    18. Francesco Arfelli & Cristian Tosi & Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Wood Biomass Gasification Plant and Implications for Syngas and Biochar Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Hosseini, Seyed Mohsen & Kanagaraj, N. & Sadeghi, Shahrbanoo & Yousefi, Hossein, 2022. "Midpoint and endpoint impacts of electricity generation by renewable and nonrenewable technologies: A case study of Alberta, Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 22-39.
    20. Fang, Yan Ru & Hossain, MD Shouquat & Peng, Shuan & Han, Ling & Yang, Pingjian, 2024. "Sustainable energy development of crop straw in five southern provinces of China: Bioenergy production, land, and water saving potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:328:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225022509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.