IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v313y2024ics0360544224034406.html

Site selection of sludge pyrolysis projects based on improved interactive multi-indicators decision-making method under vague linguistic environment: A decision framework from the perspective of low-carbon

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Yanqin
  • Zhen, Yuhang
  • Liu, Lanling
  • Zhang, Yiwei
  • Ning, Xiaoyang
  • Li, Kai
  • Zhao, Li
  • Lu, Qiang

Abstract

Given the escalating municipal sludge production in China, ensuring the environmental sustainability demands safe and effective treatment technology. Pyrolysis (PY) has emerged as an efficient sludge treatment technology to control the pollution as well as conserve fossil fuel. Site selection stands as a crucially task in the whole life cycle of the sludge PY project, and the researchers have launched some headway in the sludge treatment site selection. However, persistent challenges persist. For instance, the existing indicator framework remained inadequate, and the correlations among different indicators were ignored. To address these deficiencies, an improved-TODIM (Interactive Multi-Indicators Decision-Making) method has been proposed in this work. Firstly, a new assessment framework for the sludge PY site selection was established under the perspective of low-carbon. Secondly, the assessment information was described through the triangular fuzzy numbers, and the indicator weights were calculated by the combined weight of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and entropy method. Furthermore, an improved TODIM method was proposed based on the Choquet integral to describe the correlation among indicators and evaluate the optional alternative. Finally, a case study in Hebei province was presented to substantiate the validity and rationality of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Yanqin & Zhen, Yuhang & Liu, Lanling & Zhang, Yiwei & Ning, Xiaoyang & Li, Kai & Zhao, Li & Lu, Qiang, 2024. "Site selection of sludge pyrolysis projects based on improved interactive multi-indicators decision-making method under vague linguistic environment: A decision framework from the perspective of low-carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224034406
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224034406
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiawen Zhang & Zhiyi Liang & Toru Matsumoto & Tiejia Zhang, 2022. "Environmental and Economic Implication of Implementation Scale of Sewage Sludge Recycling Systems Considering Carbon Trading Price," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Arianna Callegari & Andrea Giuseppe Capodaglio, 2018. "Properties and Beneficial Uses of (Bio)Chars, with Special Attention to Products from Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Wu, Yunna & Wang, Jing & Hu, Yong & Ke, Yiming & Li, Lingwenying, 2018. "An extended TODIM-PROMETHEE method for waste-to-energy plant site selection based on sustainability perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Ren, Jingzheng & Liang, Hanwei & Dong, Liang & Gao, Zhiqiu & He, Chang & Pan, Ming & Sun, Lu, 2017. "Sustainable development of sewage sludge-to-energy in China: Barriers identification and technologies prioritization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 384-396.
    6. Yunna Wu & Lei Qin & Chuanbo Xu & Shaoyu Ji, 2018. "Site Selection of Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Plant considering Public Satisfaction by an Extended VIKOR Method," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, November.
    7. Jayarathna, Lasinidu & Kent, Geoff & O’Hara, Ian & Hobson, Philip, 2022. "Geographical information system based fuzzy multi criteria analysis for sustainability assessment of biomass energy plant siting: A case study in Queensland, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Zhao, Xin-gang & Li, Ang, 2016. "A multi-objective sustainable location model for biomass power plants: Case of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1184-1193.
    9. Eldredge, T.V., 2021. "The feasibility of solar assisted pyrolysis of sewer sludge and its potential for CO2 emissions reductions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Ma, Chenshuo & Zhang, Yifei & Ma, Keni & Li, Chanyun, 2023. "Study on the relationship between service scale and investment cost of energy service stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Cui, Li & Chan, Hing Kai & Zhou, Yizhuo & Dai, Jing & Lim, Jia Jia, 2019. "Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 450-461.
    4. He, Chao & Zhang, Quanguo & Ren, Jingzheng & Li, Zhaoling, 2017. "Combined cooling heating and power systems: Sustainability assessment under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 755-766.
    5. Dong, Fugui & Wang, Peijun & Li, Wanying, 2025. "Investment suitability assessment and multi-attribute decision-making research for wind-photovoltaic‑hydrogen-storage integrated project based on GIS and cloud weighted power Heronian mean operator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 401(PC).
    6. Prasenjit Mandal & Leo Mrsic & Antonios Kalampakas & Tofigh Allahviranloo & Sovan Samanta, 2024. "Multicriteria Group Decision Making Based on TODIM and PROMETHEE II Approaches with Integrating Quantum Decision Theory and Linguistic Z Number in Renewable Energy Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Lin, Boqiang & He, Jiaxin, 2017. "Is biomass power a good choice for governments in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1218-1230.
    8. Sudipa Choudhury & Apu Kumar Saha & Mrinmoy Majumder, 2020. "Optimal location selection for installation of surface water treatment plant by Gini coefficient-based analytical hierarchy process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4073-4099, June.
    9. Mohamed, Badr A. & O'Boyle, Marnie & Li, Loretta Y., 2023. "Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for sustainable liquid and gaseous fuel production: A life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    10. Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Chowdhury, Priyabrata & Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2021. "Supply chain recovery challenges in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 316-329.
    11. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    12. Shaolong Zeng & Qinyi Fu & Danni Yang & Yihua Tian & Yang Yu, 2023. "The Influencing Factors of the Carbon Trading Price: A Case of China against a “Double Carbon” Background," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    13. He, Jiaxin & Liu, Ying & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Should China support the development of biomass power generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 416-425.
    14. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Kůdela, Jakub & Smejkalová, Veronika & Šomplák, Radovan & Nevrlý, Vlastimír, 2020. "Legislation-induced planning of waste processing infrastructure: A case study of the Czech Republic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    17. Dwivedi, Ashish & Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & de Carvalho, Daniel Estima, 2022. "Integrating the circular economy and industry 4.0 for sustainable development: Implications for responsible footwear production in a big data-driven world," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Manuel Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Selection of Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Slum/Informal Settlements Using the PROMETHEE Technique: A Case Study of the Greater Karu Urban Area in Nigeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Gao, Jianwei & Guo, Fengjia & Ma, Zeyang & Huang, Xin & Li, Xiangzhen, 2020. "Multi-criteria group decision-making framework for offshore wind farm site selection based on the intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Deepak Sharma, 2018. "An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224034406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.