IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v308y2024ics0360544224023648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of hydrogen supply chains based on dynamic bi-objective optimization of costs and greenhouse gases emissions: Case study in the context of Balearic Islands

Author

Listed:
  • Montignac, Florent
  • Larrahondo Chavez, Diego
  • Arpajou, Maria-Candelaria
  • Ruby, Alain

Abstract

Balearic Islands are facing challenges related to energy demand and reliance on imported fossil fuels. In this context, hydrogen vector could be part of the technical solutions for increasing the contribution of renewable energies towards various energy demand sectors. This paper explored the use of dynamic simulation and optimization as a mean for assessing the achievable economic and environmental performance of hydrogen pathways under the specific fluctuating boundary conditions of these Islands. A bi-objective dynamic optimization approach based on a Mixed Integer Linear Programming approach has been implemented using PERSEE software to assess the tradeoffs between costs and carbon emissions of hydrogen supply chains. The chosen case study has been built using some of the technical features of the European GreenHysland project located in Balearic Islands. The optimization of the design and operating conditions of hydrogen chains involving two modes of hydrogen transport (trucks and pipeline) has been addressed, for the supply of hydrogen to fuel cell buses and taking into account the possibility of injecting hydrogen into the natural gas network. The economic and environmental optimizations resulted in different electrolyzer's operation strategies. On one hand the economic optimization led to high use rate of the electrolyzer (92 %) and high carbon impact of hydrogen due to high carbon content of grid electricity. On the other hand the environmental optimization led to a PV-following strategy with a low use rate of the electrolyzer (50 %). It was shown that in current situation, due to the high greenhouse gases intensity of Balearic electrical grid, the conditions for hydrogen to provide a net carbon advantage compared with fossil reference scenario would be to ensure a minimal direct PV share of 40 % in the electricity consumed by the electrolyzer, thus resulting in a running time availability lower than 63 % and an average use rate lower than 75 % of nominal capacity. From a greenhouse gas perspective, it was shown that the best choice would be to encourage direct solar electricity sourcing for the electrolyzer as well as maximizing injection into the natural gas grid. Finally, results showed that the choice of truck or pipeline for hydrogen transport does not have a significant influence on the total emissions compared to the influence of operation strategy. This study confirmed the interest of the dynamic optimization approach combined with epsilon-constraint method for the design of hydrogen projects to comply with future certification requirements for green or low-carbon hydrogen. In future work, the comparison of hydrogen systems with alternative energy supply chains should be extended to other categories of environmental impact through multi-objective optimization methods. Finally, innovative modeling and optimization methods should be developed to evaluate different hydrogen deployment strategies and infrastructure planning in the Balearic Islands' future energy landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Montignac, Florent & Larrahondo Chavez, Diego & Arpajou, Maria-Candelaria & Ruby, Alain, 2024. "Assessment of hydrogen supply chains based on dynamic bi-objective optimization of costs and greenhouse gases emissions: Case study in the context of Balearic Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224023648
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224023648
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Jure Jovan & Gregor Dolanc, 2020. "Can Green Hydrogen Production Be Economically Viable under Current Market Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2015. "Environmental impact assessment of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined-heat-and-power-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 455-466.
    3. Hafez, Omar & Bhattacharya, Kankar, 2012. "Optimal planning and design of a renewable energy based supply system for microgrids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 7-15.
    4. Sinha, Sunanda & Chandel, S.S., 2014. "Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 192-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Batas Bjelic, Ilija & Ciric, Rade M., 2014. "Optimal distributed generation planning at a local level – A review of Serbian renewable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 79-86.
    2. Haratian, Mojtaba & Tabibi, Pouya & Sadeghi, Meisam & Vaseghi, Babak & Poustdouz, Amin, 2018. "A renewable energy solution for stand-alone power generation: A case study of KhshU Site-Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 926-935.
    3. Nithya Saiprasad & Akhtar Kalam & Aladin Zayegh, 2019. "Triple Bottom Line Analysis and Optimum Sizing of Renewable Energy Using Improved Hybrid Optimization Employing the Genetic Algorithm: A Case Study from India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Yahya Z. Alharthi, 2023. "Performance Analysis Using Multi-Year Parameters for a Grid-Connected Wind Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Feng, Wei & Jin, Ming & Liu, Xu & Bao, Yi & Marnay, Chris & Yao, Cheng & Yu, Jiancheng, 2018. "A review of microgrid development in the United States – A decade of progress on policies, demonstrations, controls, and software tools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1656-1668.
    6. Ali, Fahad & Ahmar, Muhammad & Jiang, Yuexiang & AlAhmad, Mohammad, 2021. "A techno-economic assessment of hybrid energy systems in rural Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    7. Azaza, Maher & Wallin, Fredrik, 2017. "Multi objective particle swarm optimization of hybrid micro-grid system: A case study in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 108-118.
    8. Mayer, Martin János & Szilágyi, Artúr & Gróf, Gyula, 2020. "Environmental and economic multi-objective optimization of a household level hybrid renewable energy system by genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Seoin Baek & Heetae Kim & Hyun Joon Chang, 2016. "Optimal Hybrid Renewable Airport Power System: Empirical Study on Incheon International Airport, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Haghighat Mamaghani, Alireza & Avella Escandon, Sebastian Alberto & Najafi, Behzad & Shirazi, Ali & Rinaldi, Fabio, 2016. "Techno-economic feasibility of photovoltaic, wind, diesel and hybrid electrification systems for off-grid rural electrification in Colombia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 293-305.
    11. Tomar, Vivek & Tiwari, G.N., 2017. "Techno-economic evaluation of grid connected PV system for households with feed in tariff and time of day tariff regulation in New Delhi – A sustainable approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 822-835.
    12. Ferrari, Simone & Zagarella, Federica & Caputo, Paola & Bonomolo, Marina, 2019. "Assessment of tools for urban energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 544-551.
    13. Jung, Jaesung & Villaran, Michael, 2017. "Optimal planning and design of hybrid renewable energy systems for microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 180-191.
    14. Heetae Kim & Jinwoo Bae & Seoin Baek & Donggyun Nam & Hyunsung Cho & Hyun Joon Chang, 2017. "Comparative Analysis between the Government Micro-Grid Plan and Computer Simulation Results Based on Real Data: The Practical Case for a South Korean Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Urban, Kristof L. & Scheller, Fabian & Bruckner, Thomas, 2021. "Suitability assessment of models in the industrial energy system design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Baruah, Abhinandan & Basu, Mousumi & Amuley, Deeshank, 2021. "Modeling of an autonomous hybrid renewable energy system for electrification of a township: A case study for Sikkim, India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Heetae Kim & Seoin Baek & Kyu Ha Choi & Dojin Kim & Seongmin Lee & Dahill Kim & Hyun Joon Chang, 2016. "Comparative Analysis of On- and Off-Grid Electrification: The Case of Two South Korean Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Goel, Sonali & Sharma, Renu, 2017. "Performance evaluation of stand alone, grid connected and hybrid renewable energy systems for rural application: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1378-1389.
    19. Pablo Benalcazar & Adam Suski & Jacek Kamiński, 2020. "The Effects of Capital and Energy Subsidies on the Optimal Design of Microgrid Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Mominul Islam, Shah Mohammad & Salema, Arshad Adam & Saleheen, Mohammed Zeehan & Lim, Joanne Mun Yee, 2022. "The influence of shifting the electric bus charging routine on the techno-economic performance of a solar-powered bus depot," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224023648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.