IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v276y2023ics0360544223010101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical and economic assessment of iron and steelmaking decarbonization via power to gas and amine scrubbing

Author

Listed:
  • Perpiñán, Jorge
  • Bailera, Manuel
  • Peña, Begoña
  • Romeo, Luis M.
  • Eveloy, Valerie

Abstract

The iron and steel industry is one of the most energy-intensive industries, emitting 5% of the total anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2). The control of CO2 emissions has become increasingly stringent in the European Union (EU), resulting in EU allowance above 90 €/tCO2. Carbon capture will be required to achieve CO2 emissions control, and carbon utilization via power-to-gas could significantly increase interest in carbon capture in the iron and steel sector. This paper presents a new concept that combines amine scrubbing with power-to-gas to reduce emissions in blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace steelmaking plants. Synthetic natural gas (SNG) is produced using green hydrogen from water electrolysis and CO2 from steelmaking. The synthetic natural gas is later used as a reducing agent in the blast furnace, constantly recycling carbon in a closed loop and avoiding geological storage. The oxygen by-produced via electrolysis eliminates the necessity of an air separation unit. By applying these innovations to steelmaking, a reduction in CO2 emissions of 9.4% is obtained with an energy penalty of 16.2 MJ/kgCO2, and economic costs of 52 €/tHM or 283 €/tCO2. A sensitivity analysis with respect to electricity and the CO2 allowances prices is also performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Perpiñán, Jorge & Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Romeo, Luis M. & Eveloy, Valerie, 2023. "Technical and economic assessment of iron and steelmaking decarbonization via power to gas and amine scrubbing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223010101
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223010101
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Strefler & Elmar Kriegler & Nico Bauer & Gunnar Luderer & Robert C. Pietzcker & Anastasis Giannousakis & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2021. "Alternative carbon price trajectories can avoid excessive carbon removal," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Wu, Junnian & Wang, Ruiqi & Pu, Guangying & Qi, Hang, 2016. "Integrated assessment of exergy, energy and carbon dioxide emissions in an iron and steel industrial network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 430-444.
    3. He, Kun & Wang, Li, 2017. "A review of energy use and energy-efficient technologies for the iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1022-1039.
    4. Götz, Manuel & Lefebvre, Jonathan & Mörs, Friedemann & McDaniel Koch, Amy & Graf, Frank & Bajohr, Siegfried & Reimert, Rainer & Kolb, Thomas, 2016. "Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1371-1390.
    5. Jorge Perpiñán & Manuel Bailera & Luis M. Romeo & Begoña Peña & Valerie Eveloy, 2021. "CO 2 Recycling in the Iron and Steel Industry via Power-to-Gas and Oxy-Fuel Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Bailera, Manuel & Espatolero, Sergio & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M., 2017. "Power to gas-electrochemical industry hybrid systems: A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 435-446.
    7. Rosenfeld, Daniel C. & Böhm, Hans & Lindorfer, Johannes & Lehner, Markus, 2020. "Scenario analysis of implementing a power-to-gas and biomass gasification system in an integrated steel plant: A techno-economic and environmental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1511-1524.
    8. Quader, M. Abdul & Ahmed, Shamsuddin & Ghazilla, Raja Ariffin Raja & Ahmed, Shameem & Dahari, Mahidzal, 2015. "A comprehensive review on energy efficient CO2 breakthrough technologies for sustainable green iron and steel manufacturing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 594-614.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatarczuk, Adam & Szega, Marcin & Zuwała, Jarosław, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of a post-combustion carbon dioxide capture process in a pilot plant equipped with a heat integrated stripper," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Perpiñán & Manuel Bailera & Luis M. Romeo & Begoña Peña & Valerie Eveloy, 2021. "CO 2 Recycling in the Iron and Steel Industry via Power-to-Gas and Oxy-Fuel Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Yuancheng Lin & Honghua Yang & Linwei Ma & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2021. "Low-Carbon Development for the Iron and Steel Industry in China and the World: Status Quo, Future Vision, and Key Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-28, November.
    4. David Borge-Diez & Enrique Rosales-Asensio & Emin Açıkkalp & Daniel Alonso-Martínez, 2023. "Analysis of Power to Gas Technologies for Energy Intensive Industries in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Bhadbhade, Navdeep & Zuberi, M. Jibran S. & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "A bottom-up analysis of energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials for the swiss metals sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 173-186.
    6. Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M., 2018. "Decision-making methodology for managing photovoltaic surplus electricity through Power to Gas: Combined heat and power in urban buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1032-1045.
    7. Michael Bampaou & Kyriakos Panopoulos & Panos Seferlis & Amaia Sasiain & Stephane Haag & Philipp Wolf-Zoellner & Markus Lehner & Leokadia Rog & Przemyslaw Rompalski & Sebastian Kolb & Nina Kieberger &, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Renewable Hydrogen Integration into Steelworks for the Production of Methanol and Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Sergio García García & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Henar Morán Palacios & Adriano Mones Bayo, 2020. "A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model for the Optimization of Steel Waste Gases in Cogeneration: A Combined Coke Oven and Converter Gas Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Liu, Changxin & Xie, Zhihui & Sun, Fengrui & Chen, Lingen, 2017. "Exergy analysis and optimization of coking process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 694-705.
    10. Bailera, M. & Lisbona, P. & Llera, E. & Peña, B. & Romeo, L.M., 2019. "Renewable energy sources and power-to-gas aided cogeneration for non-residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 226-238.
    11. Zoltán Csedő & Máté Zavarkó & Balázs Vaszkun & Sára Koczkás, 2021. "Hydrogen Economy Development Opportunities by Inter-Organizational Digital Knowledge Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Cheng, Zhilong & Tan, Zhoutuo & Guo, Zhigang & Yang, Jian & Wang, Qiuwang, 2020. "Recent progress in sustainable and energy-efficient technologies for sinter production in the iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    13. Wang, Peng & Zhao, Shen & Dai, Tao & Peng, Kun & Zhang, Qi & Li, Jiashuo & Chen, Wei-Qiang, 2022. "Regional disparities in steel production and restrictions to progress on global decarbonization: A cross-national analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Shuangping Wu & Anjun Xu, 2021. "Calculation Method of Energy Saving in Process Engineering: A Case Study of Iron and Steel Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Wu, Junnian & Pu, Guangying & Guo, Yan & Lv, Jingwen & Shang, Jiangwei, 2018. "Retrospective and prospective assessment of exergy, life cycle carbon emissions, and water footprint for coking network evolution in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 479-493.
    16. Eveloy, Valerie, 2019. "Hybridization of solid oxide electrolysis-based power-to-methane with oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide utilization for energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 550-571.
    17. Valerie Eveloy & Tesfaldet Gebreegziabher, 2018. "A Review of Projected Power-to-Gas Deployment Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-52, July.
    18. Na, Hongming & Sun, Jingchao & Qiu, Ziyang & He, Jianfei & Yuan, Yuxing & Yan, Tianyi & Du, Tao, 2021. "A novel evaluation method for energy efficiency of process industry — A case study of typical iron and steel manufacturing process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2021. "A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Máté Zavarkó & Attila R. Imre & Gábor Pörzse & Zoltán Csedő, 2021. "Past, Present and Near Future: An Overview of Closed, Running and Planned Biomethanation Facilities in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223010101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.