IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v208y2020ics0360544220315486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of turbulence modelling in AD/RANS simulations of single wind & tidal turbine wakes and double wake interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Linlin
  • Song, Yilei
  • Zhao, Ning
  • Shen, Wenzhong
  • Zhu, Chunling
  • Wang, Tongguang

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the RANS-based generalized actuator disc method (AD/RANS) with different turbulence models for simulating single wind & tidal turbine wakes and double wake interactions is performed. The tested turbulence models include the Realizable k-ε, SST k-ω, Linear Reynolds-stress (RSM) and two proposed RSM models with modified closure constants. The evaluation is based on comparing their results against five sets of published experimental data for various types of turbines operating under a wide range of inflow conditions. Special emphasis is put on both horizontal and vertical distributions of velocity deficit and turbulence intensity throughout the whole wake region. The results identify that the wake flow prediction is particularly sensitive to the turbulence model implemented, with a maximum difference reaching up to 40%. Overall, the proposed Mod2 RSM model (along with a new derivation of turbulence intensity) is recommended as a robust choice for capturing wake behaviors, in both near and far field from the turbine. Additionally, the weaknesses and strengths of other models are discussed, aiming to give a guideline for choosing the right model for the right job as well as to provide a reference study about the accuracy improvement of wake predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Zhao, Ning & Shen, Wenzhong & Zhu, Chunling & Wang, Tongguang, 2020. "Effects of turbulence modelling in AD/RANS simulations of single wind & tidal turbine wakes and double wake interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:208:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220315486
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220315486
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shives, Michael & Crawford, Curran, 2016. "Adapted two-equation turbulence closures for actuator disk RANS simulations of wind & tidal turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 273-292.
    2. Ian Masters & Alison Williams & T. Nick Croft & Michael Togneri & Matt Edmunds & Enayatollah Zangiabadi & Iain Fairley & Harshinie Karunarathna, 2015. "A Comparison of Numerical Modelling Techniques for Tidal Stream Turbine Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Martínez-Tossas, Luis A. & Meneveau, Charles, 2018. "Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 470-478.
    4. Guo-Wei Qian & Takeshi Ishihara, 2018. "A New Analytical Wake Model for Yawed Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Rocha, P.A. Costa & Rocha, H.H. Barbosa & Carneiro, F.O. Moura & Vieira da Silva, M.E. & Bueno, A. Valente, 2014. "k–ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model calibration: A case study on a small scale horizontal axis wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 412-418.
    6. Nguyen, Van Thinh & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Santa Cruz, Alina, 2016. "Modelling turbulence with an Actuator Disk representing a tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 625-635.
    7. Huilai Ren & Xiaodong Zhang & Shun Kang & Sichao Liang, 2018. "Actuator Disc Approach of Wind Turbine Wake Simulation Considering Balance of Turbulence Kinetic Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Jeon, Sanghyeon & Kim, Bumsuk & Huh, Jongchul, 2015. "Comparison and verification of wake models in an onshore wind farm considering single wake condition of the 2 MW wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1769-1777.
    9. Castellani, Francesco & Vignaroli, Andrea, 2013. "An application of the actuator disc model for wind turbine wakes calculations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 432-440.
    10. Linlin Tian & Yilei Song & Ning Zhao & Wenzhong Shen & Tongguang Wang, 2019. "AD/RANS Simulations of Wind Turbine Wake Flow Employing the RSM Turbulence Model: Impact of Isotropic and Anisotropic Inflow Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Bai, Guanghui & Li, Jun & Fan, Pengfei & Li, Guojun, 2013. "Numerical investigations of the effects of different arrays on power extractions of horizontal axis tidal current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 180-186.
    12. Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim & Montazeri, Hamid & Blocken, Bert, 2019. "On the accuracy of turbulence models for CFD simulations of vertical axis wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 838-857.
    13. Abdulqadir, Sherwan A. & Iacovides, Hector & Nasser, Adel, 2017. "The physical modelling and aerodynamics of turbulent flows around horizontal axis wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 767-799.
    14. Jianxiao Hu & Qingshan Yang & Jian Zhang, 2016. "Study on the Wake of a Miniature Wind Turbine Using the Reynolds Stress Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asmuth, Henrik & Navarro Diaz, Gonzalo P. & Madsen, Helge Aagaard & Branlard, Emmanuel & Meyer Forsting, Alexander R. & Nilsson, Karl & Jonkman, Jason & Ivanell, Stefan, 2022. "Wind turbine response in waked inflow: A modelling benchmark against full-scale measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 868-887.
    2. Xu, Zongyuan & Gao, Xiaoxia & Zhang, Huanqiang & Lv, Tao & Han, Zhonghe & Zhu, Xiaoxun & Wang, Yu, 2023. "Analysis of the anisotropy aerodynamic characteristics of downstream wind turbine considering the 3D wake expansion based on coupling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Zhen Qin & Xiaoran Tang & Yu-Ting Wu & Sung-Ki Lyu, 2022. "Advancement of Tidal Current Generation Technology in Recent Years: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Navarro Diaz, Gonzalo P. & Saulo, A. Celeste & Otero, Alejandro D., 2021. "Full wind rose wind farm simulation including wake and terrain effects for energy yield assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Hamlaoui, M.N. & Smaili, A. & Dobrev, I. & Pereira, M. & Fellouah, H. & Khelladi, S., 2022. "Numerical and experimental investigations of HAWT near wake predictions using Particle Image Velocimetry and Actuator Disk Method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linlin Tian & Yilei Song & Ning Zhao & Wenzhong Shen & Tongguang Wang, 2019. "AD/RANS Simulations of Wind Turbine Wake Flow Employing the RSM Turbulence Model: Impact of Isotropic and Anisotropic Inflow Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "A semi-analytic method to optimize tidal farm layouts – Application to the Alderney Race (Raz Blanchard), France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1168-1180.
    4. Huilai Ren & Xiaodong Zhang & Shun Kang & Sichao Liang, 2018. "Actuator Disc Approach of Wind Turbine Wake Simulation Considering Balance of Turbulence Kinetic Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Brown, S.A. & Ransley, E.J. & Greaves, D.M., 2020. "Developing a coupled turbine thrust methodology for floating tidal stream concepts: Verification under prescribed motion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 529-540.
    6. Dominguez, Favio & Achard, Jean-Luc & Zanette, Jerônimo & Corre, Christophe, 2016. "Fast power output prediction for a single row of ducted cross-flow water turbines using a BEM-RANS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 658-670.
    7. Asmuth, Henrik & Navarro Diaz, Gonzalo P. & Madsen, Helge Aagaard & Branlard, Emmanuel & Meyer Forsting, Alexander R. & Nilsson, Karl & Jonkman, Jason & Ivanell, Stefan, 2022. "Wind turbine response in waked inflow: A modelling benchmark against full-scale measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 868-887.
    8. Hegazy, Amr & Blondel, Frédéric & Cathelain, Marie & Aubrun, Sandrine, 2022. "LiDAR and SCADA data processing for interacting wind turbine wakes with comparison to analytical wake models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 457-471.
    9. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    10. Nguyen, Van Thinh & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Santa Cruz, Alina, 2016. "Modelling turbulence with an Actuator Disk representing a tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 625-635.
    11. Zhaobin Li & Xiaolei Yang, 2020. "Evaluation of Actuator Disk Model Relative to Actuator Surface Model for Predicting Utility-Scale Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Thé, Jesse & Yu, Hesheng, 2017. "A critical review on the simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics focusing on hybrid RANS-LES methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-289.
    13. Gauvin-Tremblay, Olivier & Dumas, Guy, 2022. "Hydrokinetic turbine array analysis and optimization integrating blockage effects and turbine-wake interactions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 851-869.
    14. Mou Lin & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2019. "Large-Eddy Simulation of Yawed Wind-Turbine Wakes: Comparisons with Wind Tunnel Measurements and Analytical Wake Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Foley, Aoife M., 2020. "Lidar assisted wake redirection in wind farms: A data driven approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 484-493.
    16. Leidy Tatiana Contreras & Omar Dario Lopez & Santiago Lain, 2018. "Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling and Simulation of an Inclined Horizontal Axis Hydrokinetic Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Niebuhr, C.M. & Schmidt, S. & van Dijk, M. & Smith, L. & Neary, V.S., 2022. "A review of commercial numerical modelling approaches for axial hydrokinetic turbine wake analysis in channel flow," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2020. "URANS simulations of a horizontal axis wind turbine under stall condition using Reynolds stress turbulence models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Nicolas & Guillou, Sylvain & Good, Andrew & Lewis, Michael, 2020. "Wake field study of tidal turbines under realistic flow conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1196-1208.
    20. De-Zhi Wei & Ni-Na Wang & De-Cheng Wan, 2021. "Modelling Yawed Wind Turbine Wakes: Extension of a Gaussian-Based Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:208:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220315486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.