IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v111y2016icp226-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovery of creosote from used railroad ties by thermal desorption

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Pyoungchung
  • Lloyd, Jeff
  • Kim, Jae-Woo
  • Abdoulmoumine, Nourredine
  • Labbé, Nicole

Abstract

Used creosote-treated wood ties were thermally treated between 250 and 350 °C to recover preservative and upgrade the wood to provide an improved quality biomass for thermochemical processes. With thermal treatments ranging from 250 to 300 °C, the amounts of creosote, mostly consisting of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), recovered were from 47 to 79% of total creosote present in the used ties. Thermal treatment at 350 °C recovered 97% of total PAH compounds. Larger amounts of PAHs with higher molecular weights (HMWs) and lower vapor pressures (LVP) were recovered at elevated temperatures. Temperature above 300 °C decomposed the wood matrix, with a mass loss ranging between 50 and 63 wt% and produced large amounts of light organics, anhydrosugars, and phenolic compounds that would contaminate the recovered creosote. Our study concluded that thermal treatment ranging between 275 and 300 °C would be preferred to recover preservative for recycling and improve the wood quality, i.e., high carbon content and caloric value, and low hazardous pollutants (creosote residues) for thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis or gasification. These findings suggest that the proposed approach could be a commercially viable and environmentally beneficial alternative to landfill for used railroad ties.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Pyoungchung & Lloyd, Jeff & Kim, Jae-Woo & Abdoulmoumine, Nourredine & Labbé, Nicole, 2016. "Recovery of creosote from used railroad ties by thermal desorption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 226-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:226-236
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216307459
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Jianghong & Bi, Xiaotao T., 2015. "A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 847-866.
    2. Jung, Su-Hwa & Koo, Won-Mo & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2013. "Fast pyrolysis of creosote treated wood ties in a fluidized bed reactor and analytical characterization of product fractions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 33-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Bo-Jhih, 2016. "Characteristics of products from the pyrolysis of oil palm fiber and its pellets in nitrogen and carbon dioxide atmospheres," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 569-578.
    2. Qin, Fanzhi & Zhang, Chen & Zeng, Guangming & Huang, Danlian & Tan, Xiaofei & Duan, Abing, 2022. "Lignocellulosic biomass carbonization for biochar production and characterization of biochar reactivity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Fan, Yuyang & Tippayawong, Nakorn & Wei, Guoqiang & Huang, Zhen & Zhao, Kun & Jiang, Liqun & Zheng, Anqing & Zhao, Zengli & Li, Haibin, 2020. "Minimizing tar formation whilst enhancing syngas production by integrating biomass torrefaction pretreatment with chemical looping gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Leonel J. R. Nunes & João C. O. Matias, 2020. "Biomass Torrefaction as a Key Driver for the Sustainable Development and Decarbonization of Energy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-9, January.
    5. Jaime Martín-Pascual & Joaquín Jódar & Miguel L. Rodríguez & Montserrat Zamorano, 2020. "Determination of the Optimal Operative Conditions for the Torrefaction of Olive Waste Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-11, August.
    6. Schipfer, Fabian & Kranzl, Lukas, 2019. "Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-end-use chains based on densified bioenergy carriers (dBECs)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 715-724.
    7. Ansari, Khursheed B. & Gaikar, Vilas G., 2019. "Investigating production of hydrocarbon rich bio-oil from grassy biomass using vacuum pyrolysis coupled with online deoxygenation of volatile products over metallic iron," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 305-318.
    8. Moya, Roger & Rodríguez-Zúñiga, Ana & Puente-Urbina, Allen & Gaitán-Álvarez, Johanna, 2018. "Study of light, middle and severe torrefaction and effects of extractives and chemical compositions on torrefaction process by thermogravimetric analysis in five fast-growing plantations of Costa Rica," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Jha, Gaurav & Soren, S., 2017. "Study on applicability of biomass in iron ore sintering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 399-407.
    11. Zhang, Shuping & Su, Yinhai & Xu, Dan & Zhu, Shuguang & Zhang, Houlei & Liu, Xinzhi, 2018. "Effects of torrefaction and organic-acid leaching pretreatment on the pyrolysis behavior of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 804-813.
    12. Riaz, Sajid & Oluwoye, Ibukun & Al-Abdeli, Yasir M., 2022. "Oxidative torrefaction of densified woody biomass: Performance, combustion kinetics and thermodynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 908-918.
    13. Li, C.Y. & Deethayat, T. & Wu, J.Y. & Kiatsiriroat, T. & Wang, R.Z., 2018. "Simulation and evaluation of a biomass gasification-based combined cooling, heating, and power system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 238-255.
    14. Campbell, William A. & Coller, Amy & Evitts, Richard W., 2019. "Comparing severity of continuous torrefaction for five biomass with a wide range of bulk density and particle size," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 964-972.
    15. Xu, Hao & Cheng, Shuo & Hungwe, Douglas & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Takahashi, Fumitake, 2022. "Co-pyrolysis coupled with torrefaction enhances hydrocarbons production from rice straw and oil sludge: The effect of torrefaction on co-pyrolysis synergistic behaviors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    16. Yun, Huimin & Clift, Roland & Bi, Xiaotao, 2020. "Process simulation, techno-economic evaluation and market analysis of supply chains for torrefied wood pellets from British Columbia: Impacts of plant configuration and distance to market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Ren, Xueyong & Shanb Ghazani, Mohammad & Zhu, Hui & Ao, Wenya & Zhang, Han & Moreside, Emma & Zhu, Jinjiao & Yang, Pu & Zhong, Na & Bi, Xiaotao, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    18. Ping Wang & Bret H. Howard, 2017. "Impact of Thermal Pretreatment Temperatures on Woody Biomass Chemical Composition, Physical Properties and Microstructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Bonassa, Gabriela & Schneider, Lara Talita & Canever, Victor Bruno & Cremonez, Paulo André & Frigo, Elisandro Pires & Dieter, Jonathan & Teleken, Joel Gustavo, 2018. "Scenarios and prospects of solid biofuel use in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2365-2378.
    20. Jorge Miguel Carneiro Ribeiro & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias & Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes, 2018. "Future Perspectives of Biomass Torrefaction: Review of the Current State-Of-The-Art and Research Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:226-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.