IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v10y1985i10p1079-1088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a conservation program for commercial and industrial customers

Author

Listed:
  • Train, Kenneth
  • Ignelzi, Patrice
  • Kumm, Mark

Abstract

We evaluate a utility-sponsored conservation program in which commercial and industrial customers received cash rebates for installing energy-saving devices. Our analysis indicates: 1.(1) Customers who asked to be audited (as opposed to a utility representative initiating the audit) had a greater tendency to install hardware under the program than those who had not asked to be audited.2.(2) Up to a point, larger customers had a greater tendency to install hardware than smaller customers; however, the very largest customers had a lower probability of participating than smaller customers, possibly because the rebates were insufficiently large to affect their decision making.3.(3) Lighting system changes were by far the most popular type of installation.4.(4) Most of the hardware installed under the program had very short payback periods to the customer, with more than half the items having payback periods of less than one year.5.(5) Statistical analysis of customers' energy bills before and after the hardware installation revealed identifiable reductions in energy consumption; the amount of reduction varied, depending on the type of hardware installed, from 2.1 to 5.7% of monthly kWh consumption.6.(6) The cost per kWh of statistically estimated energy savings was much less than the average fuel costs for generation, indicating that conservation through rebates may be a cost-effective alternative supply of energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Train, Kenneth & Ignelzi, Patrice & Kumm, Mark, 1985. "Evaluation of a conservation program for commercial and industrial customers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(10), pages 1079-1088.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:10:y:1985:i:10:p:1079-1088
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(85)90023-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544285900234
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(85)90023-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirst, Eric & Berry, Linda & Soderstrom, Jon, 1981. "Review of utility home energy audit programs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(7), pages 621-630.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Dasheng & Cheng, Chin-Chi, 2016. "Energy savings by energy management systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 760-777.
    2. Dulleck, Uwe & Kaufmann, Sylvia, 2004. "Do customer information programs reduce household electricity demand?--the Irish program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1025-1032, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Estiri, Hossein, 2014. "Building and household X-factors and energy consumption at the residential sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 178-184.
    2. Tonn, Bruce & Berry, Linda, 1986. "Determinants of participation in home energy audit/loan programs: Discrete choice model results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 785-795.
    3. Hoicka, Christina E. & Parker, Paul & Andrey, Jean, 2014. "Residential energy efficiency retrofits: How program design affects participation and outcomes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 594-607.
    4. Paul C. Stern & Elliot Aronson & John M. Darley & Daniel H. Hill & Eric Hirst & Willett Kempton & Thomas J. Wilbanks, 1986. "The Effectiveness of Incentives for Residential Energy Conservation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 147-176, April.
    5. Schleich, Joachim & Gassmann, Xavier & Faure, Corinne & Meissner, Thomas, 2016. "Making the implicit explicit: A look inside the implicit discount rate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 321-331.
    6. Komang Adi Kurniawan Saputra & Bambang Subroto & Aulia Fuad Rahman & Erwin Saraswati, 2022. "Eco-Efficiency and Energy Audit to Improve Environmental Performance: An Empirical Study of Hotels in Bali-Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 175-182, November.
    7. Eric Hirst & John Trimble & Richard Goeltz & N. Scott Cardell, 1983. "Use of Synthetic Data in Dealing With Self-Selection," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(6), pages 807-830, December.
    8. Peter Morris & Laurie Buys & Desley Vine, 2014. "Moving from Outsider to Insider: Peer Status and Partnerships between Electricity Utilities and Residential Consumers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8, June.
    9. Alexander M. Brill & Kevin A. Hassett & Gilbert E. Metcalf, 1999. "Household Energy Conservation Investment and the Uninformed Consumer Hypothesis," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 9918, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    10. Murphy, Lorraine, 2014. "The influence of energy audits on the energy efficiency investments of private owner-occupied households in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 398-407.
    11. Collins, Matthew & Curtis, John, 2016. "An Examination of Energy Efficiency Retrofit Depth in Ireland," Papers WP532, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    12. Sanquist, Thomas F. & Orr, Heather & Shui, Bin & Bittner, Alvah C., 2012. "Lifestyle factors in U.S. residential electricity consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 354-364.
    13. Linda Berry, 1983. "Residential Conservation Program Impacts," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(6), pages 753-775, December.
    14. Kushler, Martin G. & Saul, John A., 1984. "Evaluating the impact of the Michigan RCS home energy audit program," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 113-124.
    15. Peter Morris & Desley Vine & Laurie Buys, 2018. "Critical Success Factors for Peak Electricity Demand Reduction: Insights from a Successful Intervention in a Small Island Community," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 33-54, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:10:y:1985:i:10:p:1079-1088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.