IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v42y2012icp670-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interference of regional support policies on the economic and environmental performance of a hybrid cogeneration-solar panel energy system

Author

Listed:
  • Maes, Dries
  • Van Passel, Steven

Abstract

This paper assesses unintentional interference between different public policies promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy. The paper develops a methodology to study the interference by analysing the economic and technical behaviour of a hybrid energy system. The hybrid energy system in this case consists of an existing cogeneration unit extended with a new installation of thermal solar panels. This puts two complementary heating technologies in juxtaposition. The two technologies are supported with distinct regional support instruments in each region. The design and operation of the energy system is optimised from the point of view of the investor according to the different support instruments. The optimal configuration is analysed as well as its effect on reduced CO2-emissions during the lifetime of the project. The methodology is applied to a case-study for two neighbouring regions, the Netherlands and Flanders. The policies in the Netherlands show a beneficial synergy. In Flanders, the hybrid energy system is not interesting, indicating unbalanced high support for cogeneration in this case. From the point of view of the authorities, a more balanced regional policy as in the Netherlands provides a larger CO2-emission reduction for a smaller cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Maes, Dries & Van Passel, Steven, 2012. "Interference of regional support policies on the economic and environmental performance of a hybrid cogeneration-solar panel energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 670-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:42:y:2012:i:c:p:670-680
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511010500
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwon, Oh Sang & Yun, Won-Cheol & Hwan An, Dong, 2005. "Market value for thermal energy of cogeneration:: using shadow price estimation applied to cogeneration systems in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(14), pages 1789-1795, September.
    2. Lozano, M.A. & Valero, A., 1993. "Theory of the exergetic cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 939-960.
    3. Kim, Si-Moon & Oh†, Si-Doek & Kwon, Yong-Ho & Kwak, Ho-Young, 1998. "Exergoeconomic analysis of thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 393-406.
    4. Erkka Näsäkkälä & Stein‐Erik Fleten, 2005. "Flexibility and technology choice in gas fired power plant investments," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3-4), pages 371-393.
    5. Hekkert, Marko P. & Harmsen, Robert & de Jong, Arjen, 2007. "Explaining the rapid diffusion of Dutch cogeneration by innovation system functioning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 4677-4687, September.
    6. Patlitzianas, Konstantinos & Karagounis, Konstantinos, 2011. "The progress of RES environment in the most recent member states of the EU," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 429-436.
    7. Saidur, R. & Islam, M.R. & Rahim, N.A. & Solangi, K.H., 2010. "A review on global wind energy policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 1744-1762, September.
    8. Haas, Reinhard & Panzer, Christian & Resch, Gustav & Ragwitz, Mario & Reece, Gemma & Held, Anne, 2011. "A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1003-1034, February.
    9. Cardona, E. & Piacentino, A., 2006. "A new approach to exergoeconomic analysis and design of variable demand energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 490-515.
    10. Compernolle, Tine & Witters, Nele & Van Passel, Steven & Thewys, Theo, 2011. "Analyzing a self-managed CHP system for greenhouse cultivation as a profitable way to reduce CO2-emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1940-1947.
    11. Lozano, M.A. & Carvalho, M. & Serra, L.M., 2009. "Operational strategy and marginal costs in simple trigeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2001-2008.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan K. Kazak & Joanna A. Kamińska & Rafał Madej & Marta Bochenkiewicz, 2020. "Where Renewable Energy Sources Funds are Invested? Spatial Analysis of Energy Production Potential and Public Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Moosavian, S.M. & Rahim, N.A. & Selvaraj, J. & Solangi, K.H., 2013. "Energy policy to promote photovoltaic generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 44-58.
    3. Saumya Verma & Raja Chowdhury & Sarat K. Das & Matthew J. Franchetti & Gang Liu, 2021. "Sunlight Intensity, Photosynthetically Active Radiation Modelling and Its Application in Algae-Based Wastewater Treatment and Its Cost Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Marco F. Torchio, 2013. "Energy-Exergy, Environmental and Economic Criteria in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Plants: Indexes for the Evaluation of the Cogeneration Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    2. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    4. Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Amidpour, M., 2012. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of an ammonia–water power/cooling cogeneration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 271-283.
    5. Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M. & Pina, Eduardo A., 2022. "Optimal design of trigeneration systems for buildings considering cooperative game theory for allocating production cost to energy services," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    6. Pina, Eduardo A. & Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M., 2018. "Thermoeconomic cost allocation in simple trigeneration systems including thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 170-184.
    7. Piacentino, Antonio & Cardona, Fabio, 2010. "Scope-Oriented Thermoeconomic analysis of energy systems. Part I: Looking for a non-postulated cost accounting for the dissipative devices of a vapour compression chiller. Is it feasible?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 943-956, March.
    8. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    9. Seyyedi, Seyyed Masoud & Ajam, Hossein & Farahat, Said, 2010. "A new criterion for the allocation of residues cost in exergoeconomic analysis of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3474-3482.
    10. Coskun, C. & Oktay, Z. & Dincer, I., 2011. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6358-6366.
    11. Kazimierczuk, Agnieszka H., 2019. "Wind energy in Kenya: A status and policy framework review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 434-445.
    12. Guelpa, Elisa & Verda, Vittorio, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis for the design improvement of supercritical CO2 cycle in concentrated solar plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    13. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    14. Cardona, E. & Piacentino, A., 2006. "A new approach to exergoeconomic analysis and design of variable demand energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 490-515.
    15. Cardona, E. & Piacentino, A., 2009. "Optimal design of CHCP plants in the civil sector by thermoeconomics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(7-8), pages 729-748, July.
    16. Keçebaş, Ali, 2013. "Effect of reference state on the exergoeconomic evaluation of geothermal district heating systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 462-469.
    17. Schicktanz, M.D. & Wapler, J. & Henning, H.-M., 2011. "Primary energy and economic analysis of combined heating, cooling and power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 575-585.
    18. Lukas Kriechbaum & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Optimal Municipal Energy System Design and Operation Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Colesca, Sofia Elena & Ciocoiu, Carmen Nadia, 2013. "An overview of the Romanian renewable energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 149-158.
    20. Kim, D.J., 2010. "A new thermoeconomic methodology for energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 410-422.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:42:y:2012:i:c:p:670-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.