IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v328y2026i1p49-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flight test scheduling: A generic model, lower bounds, and iterated local search

Author

Listed:
  • Tao, Hanqiao
  • Song, Guopeng
  • Leus, Roel
  • Liang, Zhe
  • Jiang, Jiang

Abstract

Flight tests play a critical role in the R&D process for new aircraft as they help verify the airworthiness and capabilities and expose design and manufacturing defects. During the test course, a large number of tasks need to be scheduled appropriately so that the flight tests can be completed with minimum cost and high efficiency. Therefore, there is a strong need for developing an efficient method that can generate high-quality test schedules. In this paper, we study flight test scheduling to minimize the number of required test flights, thereby decreasing the cost and time required during the entire test course. We establish a mixed-integer programming model to formally describe the problem, propose several computationally efficient lower bounds to help verify the quality of obtained solutions, and develop an iterated local search algorithm for generating a high-quality solution in an effective manner. Comprehensive computational experiments are performed to demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed algorithm. We report some general managerial insights based on the obtained computational results.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao, Hanqiao & Song, Guopeng & Leus, Roel & Liang, Zhe & Jiang, Jiang, 2026. "Flight test scheduling: A generic model, lower bounds, and iterated local search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 49-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:49-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725004588
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:49-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.