IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v326y2025i2p299-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple sustainability criteria mapping of gas station incident consequences and subsequent decision optimisation

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, DF
  • Ivanov, O
  • Arsirii, O
  • Crook, P
  • Kanada, L
  • Labib, A
  • Teeuw, RM
  • Smyk, S

Abstract

This paper presents work towards a systematic mapping of the consequences of an incident at a public-use gas station, informing a subsequent decision regarding which gas stations to close in a given geographical zone in times of heightened risk. A criteria hierarchy of economic, environmental and social sustainability impacts is proposed. A scoring method over the set of sustainability criteria is developed. A two-level lexicographic vulnerability score for a gas filling station that considers potential loss of life and combined sustainability is then elicited. A goal programming methodology with loss of life, sustainability impact and population inconvenience goals is formulated. A case study based on the city of Portsmouth, UK is developed, with the vulnerability scores and closure recommendations of a set of gas stations calculated. Sensitivity analysis is undertaken with respect to target levels and weighting factors. The results are discussed and wider conclusions drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, DF & Ivanov, O & Arsirii, O & Crook, P & Kanada, L & Labib, A & Teeuw, RM & Smyk, S, 2025. "Multiple sustainability criteria mapping of gas station incident consequences and subsequent decision optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(2), pages 299-310.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:2:p:299-310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725002917
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:2:p:299-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.