IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v323y2025i1p170-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bi-attribute utility preference robust optimization: A continuous piecewise linear approximation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Qiong
  • Wang, Wei
  • Zhang, Sainan
  • Xu, Huifu

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a bi-attribute decision making problem where the decision maker’s (DM’s) objective is to maximize the expected utility of outcomes with two attributes but where the true utility function which captures the DM’s risk preference is ambiguous. To tackle this ambiguity, we propose a maximin bi-attribute utility preference robust optimization (BUPRO) model where the optimal decision is based on the worst-case utility function in an ambiguity set of plausible utility functions constructed using partially available information such as the DM’s specific preference for certain lotteries. Specifically, we consider a BUPRO model with two attributes, where the DM’s risk attitude is bivariate risk-averse and the ambiguity set is defined by a linear system of inequalities represented by the Lebesgue–Stieltjes integrals of the DM’s utility functions. To solve the inner infinite-dimensional minimization problem, we propose a continuous piecewise linear approximation approach to approximate the DM’s unknown true utility. Unlike the univariate case, we partition the domain of the utility function into a set of small non-overlapping rectangles and then divide each rectangle into two triangles by either the main diagonal (Type-1) or the counter diagonal (Type-2). The inner minimization problem based on the piecewise linear utility function can be reformulated as a mixed-integer linear program and the outer maximization problem can be solved efficiently by the derivative-free method. In the case that all the small triangles are partitioned either in Type-1 or in Type-2, the inner minimization can be formulated as a finite dimensional linear program and the overall maximin as a single mixed-integer program. To quantify the approximation errors, we derive, under some mild conditions, the error bound for the difference between the BUPRO model and the approximate BUPRO model in terms of the ambiguity set, the optimal value and the optimal solutions. Finally, we carry out some numerical tests to examine the performance of the proposed models and computational schemes. The results demonstrate the efficiency of the computational schemes and highlight the stability of the BUPRO model against data perturbations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Qiong & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Sainan & Xu, Huifu, 2025. "Bi-attribute utility preference robust optimization: A continuous piecewise linear approximation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 170-191.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:1:p:170-191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724008518
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juuso Liesiö & Eeva Vilkkumaa, 2021. "Nonadditive Multiattribute Utility Functions for Portfolio Decision Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 1886-1908, November.
    2. Jian Hu & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2015. "Robust decision making over a set of random targets or risk-averse utilities with an application to portfolio optimization," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 358-372, April.
    3. Michel Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt & Béatrice Rey, 2010. "Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 259-269, April.
    4. Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Alfio Giarlotta & Salvatore Greco & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci, 2020. "Rational preference and rationalizable choice," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(1), pages 61-105, February.
    5. George W. Torrance & Michael H. Boyle & Sargent P. Horwood, 1982. "Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Measure Social Preferences for Health States," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1043-1069, December.
    6. Erick Delage & Shaoyan Guo & Huifu Xu, 2022. "Shortfall Risk Models When Information on Loss Function Is Incomplete," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3511-3518, November.
    7. Tsanakas, A. & Desli, E., 2003. "Risk Measures and Theories of Choice," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 959-991, October.
    8. Fliege, Jörg & Werner, Ralf, 2014. "Robust multiobjective optimization & applications in portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 422-433.
    9. William B. Haskell & Wenjie Huang & Huifu Xu, 2018. "Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions," Papers 1805.06632, arXiv.org.
    10. Benjamin Armbruster & Erick Delage, 2015. "Decision Making Under Uncertainty When Preference Information Is Incomplete," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 111-128, January.
    11. Denuit, Michel & Eeckhoudt, Louis & Rey, B., 2010. "Somes consequences of correlation aversion in decision science," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2010017, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. Greco, Salvatore & Mousseau, Vincent & Slowinski, Roman, 2008. "Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 416-436, December.
    13. Steffen Andersen & Glenn W. Harrison & Morten I. Lau & E. Elisabet Rutström, 2018. "Multiattribute Utility Theory, Intertemporal Utility, And Correlation Aversion," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(2), pages 537-555, May.
    14. Haskell, William B. & Fu, Lunce & Dessouky, Maged, 2016. "Ambiguity in risk preferences in robust stochastic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(1), pages 214-225.
    15. Ali E. Abbas, 2009. "Multiattribute Utility Copulas," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1367-1383, December.
    16. Giarlotta, Alfio & Greco, Salvatore, 2013. "Necessary and possible preference structures," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 163-172.
    17. Liu, Jiapeng & Kadziński, Miłosz & Liao, Xiuwu & Mao, Xiaoxin & Wang, Yao, 2020. "A preference learning framework for multiple criteria sorting with diverse additive value models and valued assignment examples," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 963-985.
    18. Larry G. Epstein & Stephen M. Tanny, 1980. "Increasing Generalized Correlation: A Definition and Some Economic Consequences," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 13(1), pages 16-34, February.
    19. Scott F. Richard, 1975. "Multivariate Risk Aversion, Utility Independence and Separable Utility Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 12-21, September.
    20. Andre, Francisco J. & Riesgo, Laura, 2007. "A non-interactive elicitation method for non-linear multiattribute utility functions: Theory and application to agricultural economics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 793-807, September.
    21. Alison L. Gibbs & Francis Edward Su, 2002. "On Choosing and Bounding Probability Metrics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 70(3), pages 419-435, December.
    22. Eeckhoudt, Louis & Denuit, Michel & Rey, Beatrice, 2010. "Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2010027, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    23. Wei Wang & Huifu Xu, 2023. "Preference robust distortion risk measure and its application," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 389-434, April.
    24. Ali E. Abbas & Ronald A. Howard, 2005. "Attribute Dominance Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 185-206, December.
    25. Juan Pablo Vielma & Shabbir Ahmed & George Nemhauser, 2010. "Mixed-Integer Models for Nonseparable Piecewise-Linear Optimization: Unifying Framework and Extensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 303-315, April.
    26. Hu, Jian & Bansal, Manish & Mehrotra, Sanjay, 2018. "Robust decision making using a general utility set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 699-714.
    27. Jiapeng Liu & Miłosz Kadziński & Xiuwu Liao & Xiaoxin Mao, 2021. "Data-Driven Preference Learning Methods for Value-Driven Multiple Criteria Sorting with Interacting Criteria," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 586-606, May.
    28. Jorge González-Ortega & Vesela Radovic & David Ríos Insua, 2018. "Utility Elicitation," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Luis C. Dias & Alec Morton & John Quigley (ed.), Elicitation, chapter 0, pages 241-264, Springer.
    29. Duncan, George T, 1977. "A Matrix Measure of Multivariate Local Risk Aversion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(4), pages 895-903, May.
    30. Karni, Edi, 1979. "On Multivariate Risk Aversion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(6), pages 1391-1401, November.
    31. Eeckhoudt, Louis & Denuit, Michel & Rey, Beatrice, 2010. "Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2010010, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    32. Levy, Haim & Levy, Azriel, 1991. "Arrow-Pratt Measures of Risk Aversion: The Multivariate Case," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 32(4), pages 891-898, November.
    33. LEE, Jon & WILSON, Dan, 2001. "Polyhedral methods for piecewise-linear functions I: the lambda method," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1493, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    34. Dimitris Bertsimas & Allison O'Hair, 2013. "Learning Preferences Under Noise and Loss Aversion: An Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1190-1199, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Louis Eeckhoudt & Elisa Pagani & Eugenio Peluso, 2023. "Multidimensional risk aversion: the cardinal sin," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 15-31, January.
    2. Andrew Grant & Steve Satchell, 2019. "Endogenous divorce risk and investment," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 845-876, July.
    3. Michel Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2010. "Bivariate Stochastic Dominance and Substitute Risk-(In)dependent Utilities," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 302-312, September.
    4. Yonatan Aumann, 2015. "A conceptual foundation for the theory of risk aversion," Discussion Paper Series dp686, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    5. William B. Haskell & Wenjie Huang & Huifu Xu, 2018. "Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions," Papers 1805.06632, arXiv.org.
    6. Kenneth C. Lichtendahl & Raul O. Chao & Samuel E. Bodily, 2012. "Habit Formation from Correlation Aversion," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 625-637, June.
    7. Denuit, Michel & Rey, Béatrice, 2013. "Another look at risk apportionment," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 335-343.
    8. Wang, Shanshan & Mehrotra, Sanjay & Peng, Chun, 2025. "Robust concave utility maximization over chance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 800-813.
    9. Wei Wang & Huifu Xu, 2023. "Preference robust state-dependent distortion risk measure on act space and its application in optimal decision making," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-51, December.
    10. Gabillon, Emmanuelle, 2020. "When choosing is painful: Anticipated regret and psychological opportunity cost," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 644-659.
    11. Christophe Courbage & Richard Peter & Béatrice Rey, 2022. "Incentive and welfare effects of correlated returns," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(1), pages 5-34, March.
    12. Christoph Heinzel, 2014. "Term structure of discount rates under multivariate s-ordered consumption growth," Working Papers SMART 14-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    13. Wei Wang & Huifu Xu, 2023. "Preference robust distortion risk measure and its application," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 389-434, April.
    14. Schosser, Josef, 2019. "Consistency between principal and agent with differing time horizons: Computing incentives under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1113-1123.
    15. Gilles Boevi Koumou & Georges Dionne, 2022. "Coherent Diversification Measures in Portfolio Theory: An Axiomatic Foundation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Elisa Pagani, 2015. "Certainty Equivalent: Many Meanings of a Mean," Working Papers 24/2015, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    17. Crainich, David & Eeckhoudt, Louis & Le Courtois, Olivier, 2017. "Health and portfolio choices: A diffidence approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 273-279.
    18. Beccacece, Francesca & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Buzzard, Greg & Cillo, Alessandra & Zionts, Stanley, 2015. "Elicitation of multiattribute value functions through high dimensional model representations: Monotonicity and interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 517-527.
    19. Denuit, Michel & Rey, Beatrice, 2012. "Uni- And Multidimensional Risk Attitudes: Some Unifying Theorems," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Luca De Gennaro Aquino & Sascha Desmettre & Yevhen Havrylenko & Mogens Steffensen, 2024. "Equilibrium control theory for Kihlstrom-Mirman preferences in continuous time," Papers 2407.16525, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:1:p:170-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.