IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v304y2023i2p411-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced instance space analysis for the maximum flow problem

Author

Listed:
  • Alipour, Hossein
  • Muñoz, Mario Andrés
  • Smith-Miles, Kate

Abstract

The Maximum Flow Problem (MFP) is a fundamental network flow theory problem, for which many algorithms, supported by strong theoretical worst-case analyses, have been proposed. However, their practical efficiency depends on the network structure, making it unclear which algorithm is best for a particular instance or a class of MFP. Instance Space Analysis (ISA) is a methodology that provides insights into such per-instance analysis. In this paper, the instance space of MFP is constructed and analysed for the first time. Novel features from the networks are extracted, capturing the performance of MFP algorithms. Additionally, this paper expands the ISA methodology by addressing the issue of how benchmark instances should be selected to reduce bias in the analysis. Using the enhanced ISA methodology with MFP as the case study, this paper demonstrates that the most important features can be detected, and machine learning methods can identify their impact on algorithm performance, whilst reducing the bias caused by over-representation within the selected sample of test instances. The enhanced methodology enables new insights into the performance of state-of-the-art general purpose MFP algorithms, as well as recommendations for the construction of comprehensive and unbiased benchmark test suites for MFP algorithm testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alipour, Hossein & Muñoz, Mario Andrés & Smith-Miles, Kate, 2023. "Enhanced instance space analysis for the maximum flow problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 411-428.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:304:y:2023:i:2:p:411-428
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722003101
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bala G. Chandran & Dorit S. Hochbaum, 2009. "A Computational Study of the Pseudoflow and Push-Relabel Algorithms for the Maximum Flow Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 358-376, April.
    2. Clemente, G.P. & Grassi, R., 2018. "Directed clustering in weighted networks: A new perspective," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 26-38.
    3. Ong, Meng Sang & Kuang, Ye Chow & Ooi, Melanie Po-Leen, 2012. "Statistical measures of two dimensional point set uniformity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 2159-2181.
    4. Ahuja, Ravindra K. & Kodialam, Murali & Mishra, Ajay K. & Orlin, James B., 1997. "Computational investigations of maximum flow algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 509-542, March.
    5. Ravindra K. Ahuja & James B. Orlin, 1996. "Use of Representative Operation Counts in Computational Testing of Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 318-330, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Chorro & Emmanuelle Jay & Philippe De Peretti & Thibault Soler, 2021. "Frequency causality measures and Vector AutoRegressive (VAR) models: An improved subset selection method suited to parsimonious systems," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 21013, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Sedeño-Noda, A. & González-Dávila, E. & González-Martín, C. & González-Yanes, A., 2009. "Preemptive benchmarking problem: An approach for official statistics in small areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 360-369, July.
    3. Roy Cerqueti & Francesca Pampurini & Annagiulia Pezzola & Anna Grazia Quaranta, 2022. "Dangerous liasons and hot customers for banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 65-89, July.
    4. Nadia von Jacobi & Vito Amendolagine, 2021. "What Feeds on What? Networks of Interdependencies between Culture and Institutions," DEM Working Papers 2021/13, Department of Economics and Management.
    5. Niu, Yi-Feng & Gao, Zi-You & Lam, William H.K., 2017. "A new efficient algorithm for finding all d-minimal cuts in multi-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 151-163.
    6. Drexl, Michael & Schneider, Michael, 2015. "A survey of variants and extensions of the location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 283-308.
    7. Renaud Chicoisne & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Enrique Rubio, 2012. "A New Algorithm for the Open-Pit Mine Production Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 517-528, June.
    8. Fabrizio Fusillo & Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2021. "The global network of embodied R&D flows," Discussion Paper series in Regional Science & Economic Geography 2021-05, Gran Sasso Science Institute, Social Sciences, revised Apr 2021.
    9. Das, Ranajit & Topal, Erkan & Mardaneh, Elham, 2023. "A review of open pit mine and waste dump schedule planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    10. Wang, Tao & Xiao, Shiying & Yan, Jun & Zhang, Panpan, 2021. "Regional and sectoral structures of the Chinese economy: A network perspective from multi-regional input–output tables," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    11. Niu, Yi-Feng & Gao, Zi-You & Lam, William H.K., 2017. "Evaluating the reliability of a stochastic distribution network in terms of minimal cuts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 75-97.
    12. Gian Paolo Clemente & Rosanna Grassi & Chiara Pederzoli, 2020. "Networks and market-based measures of systemic risk: the European banking system in the aftermath of the financial crisis," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(1), pages 159-181, January.
    13. Wang, Di & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Yang, Xiaodi & Zhang, Yanfang & Li, Yuman & Zhao, Yueying, 2021. "Multi-scenario simulation on the impact of China's electricity bidding policy based on complex networks model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Md Sayeed Anwar & Dibakar Ghosh & Nikita Frolov, 2021. "Relay Synchronization in a Weighted Triplex Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-10, September.
    15. Nadia von Jacobi & Vito Amendolagine, 2022. "What Feeds on What? Networks of Interdependencies between Culture and Institutions," Working Papers 11, SITES.
    16. Clemente, Gian Paolo & Cornaro, Alessandra, 2022. "A multilayer approach for systemic risk in the insurance sector," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Bongini, Paola & Clemente, Gian Paolo & Grassi, Rosanna, 2018. "Interconnectedness, G-SIBs and network dynamics of global banking," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 185-192.
    18. Gian Paolo Clemente & Rosanna Grassi & Asmerilda Hitaj, 2019. "Smart network based portfolios," Papers 1907.01274, arXiv.org.
    19. Lysgaard, Jens, 2004. "Reachability cuts for the vehicle routing problem with time windows," CORAL Working Papers L-2004-01, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    20. Marie Coffin & Matthew J. Saltzman, 2000. "Statistical Analysis of Computational Tests of Algorithms and Heuristics," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 24-44, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:304:y:2023:i:2:p:411-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.