IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v269y2018i2p466-485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incomplete information imputation in limited data environments with application to disaster response

Author

Listed:
  • Yagci Sokat, Kezban
  • Dolinskaya, Irina S.
  • Smilowitz, Karen
  • Bank, Ryan

Abstract

Following a major disaster, a field operations manager needs to deploy relief activities within the affected region. State-of-the-art humanitarian logistics models have been developed over the past decades to assist relief operations. However, while many models assume availability of information on infrastructure status, this is typically not the case in practice. Often, only partial information about infrastructure status is known. Utilizing the similarities in the known data via attributes, we develop a framework to impute incomplete information in limited data environments. We present an application of this framework to a past disaster, the 2010 Haiti earthquake. We build an ArcGIS model to automate the data collection and processing efforts to the extent possible. The study explores the impact of missing data, dispersion of missing data and imputation techniques used in approximating the incomplete information. Our results suggest that lower granularity yields better estimates of the unknown information above a threshold. We also develop publicly available test cases for the broader community.

Suggested Citation

  • Yagci Sokat, Kezban & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen & Bank, Ryan, 2018. "Incomplete information imputation in limited data environments with application to disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 466-485.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:2:p:466-485
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718301310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mete, Huseyin Onur & Zabinsky, Zelda B., 2010. "Stochastic optimization of medical supply location and distribution in disaster management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 76-84, July.
    2. Rawls, Carmen G. & Turnquist, Mark A., 2012. "Pre-positioning and dynamic delivery planning for short-term response following a natural disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 46-54.
    3. Begoña Vitoriano & M. Ortuño & Gregorio Tirado & Javier Montero, 2011. "A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 189-208, October.
    4. G Barbarosoǧlu & Y Arda, 2004. "A two-stage stochastic programming framework for transportation planning in disaster response," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 43-53, January.
    5. Chen, Lichun & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2012. "Optimal team deployment in urban search and rescue," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 984-999.
    6. Cassandra R. Cole & David A. Macpherson & Kathleen A. McCullough, 2010. "A Comparison of Hurricane Loss Models," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 31-53.
    7. L N Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 475-489, May.
    8. Ahmadi, Morteza & Seifi, Abbas & Tootooni, Behnam, 2015. "A humanitarian logistics model for disaster relief operation considering network failure and standard relief time: A case study on San Francisco district," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-163.
    9. Mordechai Haklay, 2010. "How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(4), pages 682-703, August.
    10. Ergun, Özlem & Heier Stamm, Jessica L. & Keskinocak, Pinar & Swann, Julie L., 2010. "Waffle House Restaurants hurricane response: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 111-120, July.
    11. Melih Çelik & Özlem Ergun & Pınar Keskinocak, 2015. "The Post-Disaster Debris Clearance Problem Under Incomplete Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 65-85, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas J. Huggins & Feiyu E & Kangming Chen & Wenwu Gong & Lili Yang, 2020. "Infrastructural Aspects of Rain-Related Cascading Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Diehlmann, Florian & Klein, Miriam & Wiens, Marcus & Lüttenberg, Markus & Schultmann, Frank, 2020. "On the value of accurate demand information in public-private emergency collaborations," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 51, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    3. Chantal Cherifi & Guillaume Bouleux & Aurélie Charles, 2021. "Towards a holistic modeling of the humanitarian crisis complex relief system," Post-Print hal-03355075, HAL.
    4. Lee, Hyun-Rok & Lee, Taesik, 2021. "Multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm to solve a partially-observable multi-agent problem in disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 296-308.
    5. Farzaneh, Mohammad Amin & Rezapour, Shabnam & Baghaian, Atefe & Amini, M. Hadi, 2023. "An integrative framework for coordination of damage assessment, road restoration, and relief distribution in disasters," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Keskin, Burcu B. & Griffin, Emily C. & Prell, Jonathan O. & Dilkina, Bistra & Ferber, Aaron & MacDonald, John & Hilend, Rowan & Griffis, Stanley & Gore, Meredith L., 2023. "Quantitative Investigation of Wildlife Trafficking Supply Chains: A Review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    8. Ioannis Kougkoulos & M. Selim Cakir & Nathan Kunz & Doreen S. Boyd & Alexander Trautrims & Kornilia Hatzinikolaou & Stefan Gold, 2021. "A Multi‐Method Approach to Prioritize Locations of Labor Exploitation for Ground‐Based Interventions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4396-4411, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renata Turkeš & Daniel Palhazi Cuervo & Kenneth Sörensen, 2019. "Pre-positioning of emergency supplies: does putting a price on human life help to save lives?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 865-895, December.
    2. Yiping Jiang & Yufei Yuan, 2019. "Emergency Logistics in a Large-Scale Disaster Context: Achievements and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    4. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    5. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    6. Li, Xiaoping & Batta, Rajan & Kwon, Changhyun, 2017. "Effective and equitable supply of gasoline to impacted areas in the aftermath of a natural disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 25-34.
    7. Sabbaghtorkan, Monir & Batta, Rajan & He, Qing, 2020. "Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 1-19.
    8. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Taheri-Moghaddam, Alireza, 2016. "An approximation approach to a trade-off among efficiency, efficacy, and balance for relief pre-positioning in disaster management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 485-509.
    9. Yusen Ye & Wen Jiao & Hong Yan, 2020. "Managing Relief Inventories Responding to Natural Disasters: Gaps Between Practice and Literature," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 807-832, April.
    10. Wilson, Duncan T. & Hawe, Glenn I. & Coates, Graham & Crouch, Roger S., 2013. "A multi-objective combinatorial model of casualty processing in major incident response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 643-655.
    11. Hu, Shaolong & Han, Chuanfeng & Dong, Zhijie Sasha & Meng, Lingpeng, 2019. "A multi-stage stochastic programming model for relief distribution considering the state of road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 64-87.
    12. Laura Laguna-Salvadó & Matthieu Lauras & Uche Okongwu & Tina Comes, 2019. "A multicriteria Master Planning DSS for a sustainable humanitarian supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1303-1343, December.
    13. Rennemo, Sigrid Johansen & Rø, Kristina Fougner & Hvattum, Lars Magnus & Tirado, Gregorio, 2014. "A three-stage stochastic facility routing model for disaster response planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 116-135.
    14. Pouraliakbari-Mamaghani, Mahsa & Saif, Ahmed & Kamal, Noreen, 2023. "Reliable design of a congested disaster relief network: A two-stage stochastic-robust optimization approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Wang, Qingyi & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for emergency supply planning considering transportation network mitigation and traffic congestion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    17. Baharmand, Hossein & Comes, Tina & Lauras, Matthieu, 2019. "Bi-objective multi-layer location–allocation model for the immediate aftermath of sudden-onset disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 86-110.
    18. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Zhang, Yidong & Li, Mingzhe & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2016. "A location-routing model for prepositioning and distributing emergency supplies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 161-176.
    19. Kunz, Nathan & Reiner, Gerald & Gold, Stefan, 2014. "Investing in disaster management capabilities versus pre-positioning inventory: A new approach to disaster preparedness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 261-272.
    20. Moddassir Khan Nayeem & Gyu M. Lee, 2021. "Robust Design of Relief Distribution Networks Considering Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:2:p:466-485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.