IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v262y2017i2p521-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequencing dual-spreader crane operations: Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Lashkari, Shabnam
  • Wu, Yong
  • Petering, Matthew E.H.

Abstract

This paper introduces the problem of scheduling a dual-spreader crane when lifts are subject to a weight limit. A mathematical model is formulated and a fast method for computing a lower bound on the optimal value is proposed. An efficient heuristic approach is designed and subsequently built into a simulated annealing framework to solve the problem. The optimization and heuristic approaches are tested on problem instances of various sizes. The results indicate that the optimization approach produces proven optimal solutions to small-sized instances but fails to solve instances of practical meaning. The heuristic approach can easily match the performance of the optimization approach for small instances and outperforms the optimization approach when tackling larger instances. On average, the heuristic approach produces solutions whose objective values are within 6% of the lower bound.

Suggested Citation

  • Lashkari, Shabnam & Wu, Yong & Petering, Matthew E.H., 2017. "Sequencing dual-spreader crane operations: Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 521-534.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:262:y:2017:i:2:p:521-534
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717302680
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Türkoğulları, Yavuz B. & Taşkın, Z. Caner & Aras, Necati & Altınel, İ. Kuban, 2014. "Optimal berth allocation and time-invariant quay crane assignment in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 88-101.
    2. Unsal, Ozgur & Oguz, Ceyda, 2013. "Constraint programming approach to quay crane scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 108-122.
    3. Raymond K. Cheung & Chung-Lun Li & Wuqin Lin, 2002. "Interblock Crane Deployment in Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 79-93, February.
    4. Feng Li & Jiuh-Biing Sheu & Zi-You Gao, 2015. "Solving the Continuous Berth Allocation and Specific Quay Crane Assignment Problems with Quay Crane Coverage Range," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 968-989, November.
    5. Panagiotis Angeloudis & Michael G. H. Bell, 2011. "A review of container terminal simulation models," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 523-540, February.
    6. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    7. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    8. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    9. Imai, Akio & Chen, Hsieh Chia & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2008. "The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 900-920, September.
    10. Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & Gilbert Laporte & Yugang Yu & René de Koster, 2015. "Scheduling Twin Yard Cranes in a Container Block," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 686-705, August.
    11. Li, Wenkai & Goh, Mark & Wu, Yong & Petering, M.E.H. & de Souza, R. & Wu, Y.C., 2012. "A continuous time model for multiple yard crane scheduling with last minute job arrivals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 332-343.
    12. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    13. Kap Hwan Kim & Ki Young Kim, 1999. "An Optimal Routing Algorithm for a Transfer Crane in Port Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 17-33, February.
    14. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13.
    15. Iris F. A. Vis & Hector J. Carlo, 2010. "Sequencing Two Cooperating Automated Stacking Cranes in a Container Terminal," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 169-182, May.
    16. Frank Meisel & Christian Bierwirth, 2013. "A Framework for Integrated Berth Allocation and Crane Operations Planning in Seaport Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 131-147, May.
    17. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan & Larsen, Allan, 2015. "Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem: Set partitioning models and computational results," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-97.
    18. Chung-Yee Lee & Ming Liu & Chengbin Chu, 2015. "Optimal Algorithm for the General Quay Crane Double-Cycling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 957-967, November.
    19. Tang, Lixin & Zhao, Jiao & Liu, Jiyin, 2014. "Modeling and solution of the joint quay crane and truck scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(3), pages 978-990.
    20. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    21. Chao, Shih-Liang & Lin, Yu-Jr, 2011. "Evaluating advanced quay cranes in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 432-445, July.
    22. Yong Wu & Wenkai Li & Matthew E. H. Petering & Mark Goh & Robert de Souza, 2015. "Scheduling Multiple Yard Cranes with Crane Interference and Safety Distance Requirement," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 990-1005, November.
    23. Ilaria Vacca & Matteo Salani & Michel Bierlaire, 2013. "An Exact Algorithm for the Integrated Planning of Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 148-161, May.
    24. Chen, Jiang Hang & Lee, Der-Horng & Cao, Jin Xin, 2011. "Heuristics for quay crane scheduling at indented berth," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1005-1020.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2021. "Joint optimization of container slot planning and truck scheduling for tandem quay cranes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 149-166.
    2. Kress, Dominik & Dornseifer, Jan & Jaehn, Florian, 2019. "An exact solution approach for scheduling cooperative gantry cranes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 82-101.
    3. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    4. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2022. "An exact algorithm for scheduling tandem quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    2. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    3. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    4. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    5. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    6. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    7. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Kai Wang & Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang, 2018. "Column Generation for the Integrated Berth Allocation, Quay Crane Assignment, and Yard Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 812-834, August.
    9. Agra, Agostinho & Oliveira, Maryse, 2018. "MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 138-148.
    10. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Zhen, Lu & Liang, Zhe & Zhuge, Dan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2017. "Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 193-217.
    12. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    13. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An almost robust optimization model for integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Shang, Xiao Ting & Cao, Jin Xin & Ren, Jie, 2016. "A robust optimization approach to the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 44-65.
    15. Noura Al-Dhaheri & Ali Diabat, 2017. "A Lagrangian relaxation-based heuristic for the multi-ship quay crane scheduling problem with ship stability constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    17. Omar Abou Kasm & Ali Diabat & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "The integrated berth allocation, quay crane assignment and scheduling problem: mathematical formulations and a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 435-461, August.
    18. Kong, Lingrui & Ji, Mingjun & Gao, Zhendi, 2022. "An exact algorithm for scheduling tandem quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Dirk Briskorn, 2021. "Routing two stacking cranes with predetermined container sequences," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 367-380, August.
    20. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:262:y:2017:i:2:p:521-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.