IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Efficient comparison of constrained systems using dormancy

  • Healey, Christopher M.
  • Andradóttir, Sigrún
  • Kim, Seong-Hee
Registered author(s):

    We consider the problem of finding the best simulated system under a primary performance measure, while also satisfying stochastic constraints on secondary performance measures. We improve upon existing constrained selection procedures by allowing certain systems to become dormant, halting sampling for those systems as the procedure continues. A system goes dormant when it is found inferior to another system whose feasibility has not been determined, and returns to contention only if its superior system is eliminated. If found feasible, the superior system will eliminate the dormant system. By making systems dormant, we avoid collecting unnecessary observations from inferior systems. The paper also proposes other modifications, and studies the impact and benefits of our approaches (compared to similar constrained selection procedures) through experimental results and asymptotic approximations. Additionally, we discuss the difficulties associated with procedures that use sample means of unequal, random sample sizes, which commonly occurs within constrained selection and optimization-via-simulation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712006352
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal European Journal of Operational Research.

    Volume (Year): 224 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 340-352

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:224:y:2013:i:2:p:340-352
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Teng, Suyan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2010. "Integration of indifference-zone with multi-objective computing budget allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 419-429, June.
    2. Pichitlamken, Juta & Nelson, Barry L. & Hong, L. Jeff, 2006. "A sequential procedure for neighborhood selection-of-the-best in optimization via simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 283-298, August.
    3. John Butler & Douglas J. Morrice & Peter W. Mullarkey, 2001. "A Multiple Attribute Utility Theory Approach to Ranking and Selection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 800-816, June.
    4. Chen, E. Jack & Kelton, W. David, 2005. "Sequential selection procedures: Using sample means to improve efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 133-153, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:224:y:2013:i:2:p:340-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.