IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v206y2010i2p395-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive multicut aggregation for two-stage stochastic linear programs with recourse

Author

Listed:
  • Trukhanov, Svyatoslav
  • Ntaimo, Lewis
  • Schaefer, Andrew

Abstract

Outer linearization methods for two-stage stochastic linear programs with recourse, such as the L-shaped algorithm, generally apply a single optimality cut on the nonlinear objective at each major iteration, while the multicut version of the algorithm allows for several cuts to be placed at once. In general, the L-shaped algorithm tends to have more major iterations than the multicut algorithm. However, the trade-offs in terms of computational time are problem dependent. This paper investigates the computational trade-offs of adjusting the level of optimality cut aggregation from single cut to pure multicut. Specifically, an adaptive multicut algorithm that dynamically adjusts the aggregation level of the optimality cuts in the master program, is presented and tested on standard large-scale instances from the literature. Computational results reveal that a cut aggregation level that is between the single cut and the multicut can result in substantial computational savings over the single cut method.

Suggested Citation

  • Trukhanov, Svyatoslav & Ntaimo, Lewis & Schaefer, Andrew, 2010. "Adaptive multicut aggregation for two-stage stochastic linear programs with recourse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 395-406, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:2:p:395-406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00156-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia L. Higle & Suvrajeet Sen, 1991. "Stochastic Decomposition: An Algorithm for Two-Stage Linear Programs with Recourse," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 650-669, August.
    2. John M. Mulvey & Andrzej Ruszczyński, 1995. "A New Scenario Decomposition Method for Large-Scale Stochastic Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 477-490, June.
    3. Birge, John R. & Louveaux, Francois V., 1988. "A multicut algorithm for two-stage stochastic linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 384-392, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Na & Jiang, Yue & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "A two-stage ambiguous stochastic program for electric vehicle charging station location problem with valet charging service," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 149-171.
    2. Wang, S. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "An integrated approach for water resources decision making under interactive and compound uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 32-40.
    3. Rahmaniani, Ragheb & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Rei, Walter, 2017. "The Benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 801-817.
    4. Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2016. "A Benders decomposition approach for the charging station location problem with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 670-695.
    5. Murwan Siddig & Yongjia Song, 2022. "Adaptive partition-based SDDP algorithms for multistage stochastic linear programming with fixed recourse," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 201-250, January.
    6. Hermann, Alexander & Jensen, Tue Vissing & Østergaard, Jacob & Kazempour, Jalal, 2022. "A complementarity model for electric power transmission-distribution coordination under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 313-329.
    7. Lawrence C. Leung & Gang Chen & Yer Van Hui & Wen He, 2016. "An Airfreight Forwarder’s Shipment Bidding and Logistics Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 275-287, February.
    8. Blanchot, Xavier & Clautiaux, François & Detienne, Boris & Froger, Aurélien & Ruiz, Manuel, 2023. "The Benders by batch algorithm: Design and stabilization of an enhanced algorithm to solve multicut Benders reformulation of two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 202-216.
    9. Wolf, Christian & Koberstein, Achim, 2013. "Dynamic sequencing and cut consolidation for the parallel hybrid-cut nested L-shaped method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 143-156.
    10. Babak Saleck Pay & Yongjia Song, 2020. "Partition-based decomposition algorithms for two-stage Stochastic integer programs with continuous recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(2), pages 583-604, January.
    11. Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2018. "Benders decomposition for the Hazmat Transport Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 996-1002.
    12. Fengqi You & Ignacio Grossmann, 2013. "Multicut Benders decomposition algorithm for process supply chain planning under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 191-211, November.
    13. Wolf, Christian & Fábián, Csaba I. & Koberstein, Achim & Suhl, Leena, 2014. "Applying oracles of on-demand accuracy in two-stage stochastic programming – A computational study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 437-448.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blanchot, Xavier & Clautiaux, François & Detienne, Boris & Froger, Aurélien & Ruiz, Manuel, 2023. "The Benders by batch algorithm: Design and stabilization of an enhanced algorithm to solve multicut Benders reformulation of two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 202-216.
    2. Fengqi You & Ignacio Grossmann, 2013. "Multicut Benders decomposition algorithm for process supply chain planning under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 191-211, November.
    3. Riis, Morten & Andersen, Kim Allan, 2005. "Applying the minimax criterion in stochastic recourse programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 569-584, September.
    4. Jeff Linderoth & Alexander Shapiro & Stephen Wright, 2006. "The empirical behavior of sampling methods for stochastic programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 215-241, February.
    5. Jacek Gondzio & Roy Kouwenberg, 2001. "High-Performance Computing for Asset-Liability Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 879-891, December.
    6. Martin Biel & Mikael Johansson, 2022. "Efficient Stochastic Programming in Julia," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1885-1902, July.
    7. Suvrajeet Sen & Yifan Liu, 2016. "Mitigating Uncertainty via Compromise Decisions in Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming: Variance Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1422-1437, December.
    8. Munoz, F.D. & Hobbs, B.F. & Watson, J.-P., 2016. "New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 888-898.
    9. Ricardo Collado & Dávid Papp & Andrzej Ruszczyński, 2012. "Scenario decomposition of risk-averse multistage stochastic programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 147-170, November.
    10. Diana Barro & Elio Canestrelli, 2005. "Time and nodal decomposition with implicit non-anticipativity constraints in dynamic portfolio optimization," GE, Growth, Math methods 0510011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. N. Edirisinghe & E. Patterson, 2007. "Multi-period stochastic portfolio optimization: Block-separable decomposition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 367-394, July.
    12. Song, Haiqing & Cheung, Raymond K. & Wang, Haiyan, 2014. "An arc-exchange decomposition method for multistage dynamic networks with random arc capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 474-487.
    13. Ruszczynski, Andrzej & Swietanowski, Artur, 1997. "Accelerating the regularized decomposition method for two stage stochastic linear problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 328-342, September.
    14. C.H. Rosa & D. Yates, 1994. "Addressing the Issue of Uncertainty Within the Egyptian Agricultural Sector," Working Papers wp94097, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    15. Chia-Hung Chen & Shangyao Yan & Miawjane Chen, 2010. "Short-term manpower planning for MRT carriage maintenance under mixed deterministic and stochastic demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 67-88, December.
    16. Tahir Ekin & Nicholas G. Polson & Refik Soyer, 2014. "Augmented Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation for Two-Stage Stochastic Programs with Recourse," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 250-264, December.
    17. Helga Meier & Nicos Christofides & Gerry Salkin, 2001. "Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty---An Integrated Approach Using Contingent Claims Analysis and Integer Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 196-206, April.
    18. A. Ruszczynski, 1993. "Regularized Decomposition of Stochastic Programs: Algorithmic Techniques and Numerical Results," Working Papers wp93021, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    19. Elisangela Martins de Sá & Ivan Contreras & Jean-François Cordeau & Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo & Gilberto de Miranda, 2015. "The Hub Line Location Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 500-518, August.
    20. D. Kuhn, 2009. "Convergent Bounds for Stochastic Programs with Expected Value Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 597-618, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:2:p:395-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.