IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v202y2010i3p781-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Availability optimization of systems subject to competing risk

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Y.
  • Elsayed, E.A.
  • Liao, H.
  • Chan, L.Y.

Abstract

This paper considers a competing risk (degradation and sudden failure) maintenance situation. A maintenance model and a repair cost model are presented. The degradation state of the units is continuously monitored. When either the degradation level reaches a predetermined threshold or a sudden failure occurs before the unit reaches the degradation threshold level, the unit is immediately repaired (renewed) and restored to operation. The subsequent repair times increase with the number of renewals. This process is repeated until a predetermined time is reached for preventive maintenance to be performed. The optimal maintenance schedule that maximizes the unit availability subject to repair cost constraint is determined in terms of the degradation threshold level and the time to perform preventive maintenance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Y. & Elsayed, E.A. & Liao, H. & Chan, L.Y., 2010. "Availability optimization of systems subject to competing risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 781-788, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:202:y:2010:i:3:p:781-788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00451-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbera, Fran & Schneider, Helmut & Watson, Ed, 1999. "A condition based maintenance model for a two-unit series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 281-290, July.
    2. Makis, Viliam & Jardine, Andrew K. S., 1993. "A note on optimal replacement policy under general repair," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 75-82, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yao & Wang, Yashun & Fan, Zhengwei & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Xun, 2021. "Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan Van Houtum, 2022. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," DEM Discussion Paper Series 22-01, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    3. Vega, Manuel A. & Hu, Zhen & Todd, Michael D., 2020. "Optimal maintenance decisions for deteriorating quoin blocks in miter gates subject to uncertainty in the condition rating protocol," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Phan, Dzung T. & Zhu, Yada, 2015. "Multi-stage optimization for periodic inspection planning of geo-distributed infrastructure systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 797-804.
    5. Lei Zhang & Yifan Zhou & Chuanhui Huang, 2017. "An approximate hybrid approach to maintenance optimisation for a system with multistate components," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 189-196, March.
    6. Navarro, Jorge & Rychlik, Tomasz, 2010. "Comparisons and bounds for expected lifetimes of reliability systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 309-317, November.
    7. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    8. Sophie Mercier & Hai Ha Pham, 2016. "A Random Shock Model with Mixed Effect, Including Competing Soft and Sudden Failures, and Dependence," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 377-400, June.
    9. Yousefi, Nooshin & Coit, David W. & Song, Sanling & Feng, Qianmei, 2019. "Optimization of on-condition thresholds for a system of degrading components with competing dependent failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2011. "Design of progressively censored group sampling plans for Weibull distributions: An optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 525-532, June.
    11. Xia, Tangbin & Xi, Lifeng & Zhou, Xiaojun & Lee, Jay, 2012. "Dynamic maintenance decision-making for series–parallel manufacturing system based on MAM–MTW methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 231-240.
    12. Yi, He & Cui, Lirong & Shen, Jingyuan & Li, Yan, 2018. "Stochastic properties and reliability measures of discrete-time semi-Markovian systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 162-173.
    13. Dong, Wenjie & Liu, Sifeng & Bae, Suk Joo & Cao, Yingsai, 2021. "Reliability modelling for multi-component systems subject to stochastic deterioration and generalized cumulative shock damages," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    14. Keedy, Elias & Feng, Qianmei, 2012. "A physics-of-failure based reliability and maintenance modeling framework for stent deployment and operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 94-101.
    15. Lu, Zhen & Shang, Jennifer, 2019. "Warranty mechanism for pre-owned tech products: Collaboration between E-tailers and online warranty provider," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 119-131.
    16. Song, Sanling & Coit, David W. & Feng, Qianmei, 2014. "Reliability for systems of degrading components with distinct component shock sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 115-124.
    17. David Han, 2014. "Optimum Constant-stress and Step-stress Accelerated Life Tests under Time and Cost Constraints," Working Papers 0173mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    18. Rassoul Noorossana & Kamyar Sabri-Laghaie, 2015. "Reliability and maintenance models for a dependent competing-risk system with multiple time-scales," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(2), pages 131-142, April.
    19. Gao, Hongda & Cui, Lirong & Qiu, Qingan, 2019. "Reliability modeling for degradation-shock dependence systems with multiple species of shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 133-143.
    20. Fernández, Arturo J., 2012. "Minimizing the area of a Pareto confidence region," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 205-212.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo R. & Ascher H. & Love E., 2001. "Towards Practical and Synthetical Modelling of Repairable Systems," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 147-182, January.
    2. KarabaÄŸ, Oktay & Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Basten, Rob, 2020. "Integrated optimization of maintenance interventions and spare part selection for a partially observable multi-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Love, C. E. & Zhang, Z. G. & Zitron, M. A. & Guo, R., 2000. "A discrete semi-Markov decision model to determine the optimal repair/replacement policy under general repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 398-409, September.
    4. Dehayem Nodem, F.I. & Kenné, J.P. & Gharbi, A., 2011. "Simultaneous control of production, repair/replacement and preventive maintenance of deteriorating manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 271-282, November.
    5. Ming-Yi You & Guang Meng, 2012. "A modularized framework for predictive maintenance scheduling," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(4), pages 380-391, August.
    6. Hu, Wei & Westerlund, Per & Hilber, Patrik & Chen, Chuanhai & Yang, Zhaojun, 2022. "A general model, estimation, and procedure for modeling recurrent failure process of high-voltage circuit breakers considering multivariate impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    7. Hong, H.P. & Zhou, W. & Zhang, S. & Ye, W., 2014. "Optimal condition-based maintenance decisions for systems with dependent stochastic degradation of components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 276-288.
    8. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    9. Cláudio Tadeu Cristino & Piotr Żebrowski & Matthias Wildemeersch, 2020. "Assessing the time intervals between economic recessions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Krivtsov, V. & Yevkin, O., 2013. "Estimation of G-renewal process parameters as an ill-posed inverse problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 10-18.
    11. Nguyen, Dinh Tuan & Dijoux, Yann & Fouladirad, Mitra, 2017. "Analytical properties of an imperfect repair model and application in preventive maintenance scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 439-453.
    12. Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zheng, Rui & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2021. "An optimal opportunistic maintenance policy for a two-unit series system with general repair using proportional hazards models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    13. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    14. Hu, Jason & Watson, Edward & Schneider, Helmut, 2005. "Approximate solutions for multi-location inventory systems with transshipments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 31-43, July.
    15. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.
    16. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2016. "Clustering condition-based maintenance for systems with redundancy and economic dependencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 531-540.
    17. Pérez Ramírez, Pedro A. & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer, 2013. "Decision support for life extension of technical systems through virtual age modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 55-69.
    18. Stadje, Wolfgang & Zuckerman, Dror, 1996. "A generalized maintenance model for stochastically deteriorating equipment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 285-301, March.
    19. Dimitrakos, T.D. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2007. "An improved algorithm for the computation of the optimal repair/replacement policy under general repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 775-782, October.
    20. Dehayem Nodem, F.I. & Kenne, J.P. & Gharbi, A., 2009. "Hierarchical decision making in production and repair/replacement planning with imperfect repairs under uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 173-189, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:202:y:2010:i:3:p:781-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.