IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v195y2009i1p262-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scalable methodology for supply chain inventory coordination with private information

Author

Listed:
  • Chu, Chi-Leung
  • Leon, V. Jorge

Abstract

This paper considers the problems of coordinating serial and assembly inventory systems with private information where end-item demands are known over a finite horizon. In a private information environment, the objective function and cost parameters of each facility are regarded as private information that no other facilities in the system have access to. The solution approach decomposes the problem into separable subproblems such that the private information is partitioned as required. Global optimality is sought with an iterative procedure in which the subproblems negotiate the level of material flows between facilities. At the core of the solution procedure is a supplier-buyer link model that can be used as a building block to form other supply chain configurations. Experimental results show that the proposed methodology provides promising results when compared to competing methodologies that disregard information privacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chu, Chi-Leung & Leon, V. Jorge, 2009. "Scalable methodology for supply chain inventory coordination with private information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 262-279, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:195:y:2009:i:1:p:262-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00156-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuik, R. & Salomon, M., 1990. "Multi-level lot-sizing problem: Evaluation of a simulated-annealing heuristic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 25-37, March.
    2. Chu, Chi-Leung & Leon, V. Jorge, 2008. "Power-of-two single-warehouse multi-buyer inventory coordination with private information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 562-574, February.
    3. Wallace B. Crowston & Michael H. Wagner, 1973. "Dynamic Lot Size Models for Multi-Stage Assembly Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 14-21, September.
    4. Harvey M. Wagner & Thomson M. Whitin, 1958. "Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 89-96, October.
    5. Arthur F. Veinott, 1969. "Minimum Concave-Cost Solution of Leontief Substitution Models of Multi-Facility Inventory Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 262-291, April.
    6. Willard I. Zangwill, 1969. "A Backlogging Model and a Multi-Echelon Model of a Dynamic Economic Lot Size Production System--A Network Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(9), pages 506-527, May.
    7. Stephen F. Love, 1972. "A Facilities in Series Inventory Model with Nested Schedules," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5-Part-1), pages 327-338, January.
    8. Panayotis Afentakis & Bezalel Gavish & Uday Karmarkar, 1984. "Computationally Efficient Optimal Solutions to the Lot-Sizing Problem in Multistage Assembly Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 222-239, February.
    9. Joseph D. Blackburn & Robert A. Millen, 1982. "Improved Heuristics for Multi-Stage Requirements Planning Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 44-56, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeong, In-Jae & Jorge Leon, V., 2012. "A serial supply chain of newsvendor problem with safety stocks under complete and partial information sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 412-419.
    2. Egri, Péter & Kis, Tamás & Kovács, András & Váncza, József, 2014. "An inverse economic lot-sizing approach to eliciting supplier cost parameters," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 80-88.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kimms, Alf & Drexl, Andreas, 1996. "Multi-level lot sizing: A literature survey," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 405, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    2. Dellaert, N. P. & Jeunet, J., 2003. "Randomized multi-level lot-sizing heuristics for general product structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 211-228, July.
    3. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    4. Dellaert, N. & Jeunet, J. & Jonard, N., 2000. "A genetic algorithm to solve the general multi-level lot-sizing problem with time-varying costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 241-257, December.
    5. Xiao, Yiyong & Kaku, Ikou & Zhao, Qiuhong & Zhang, Renqian, 2011. "A reduced variable neighborhood search algorithm for uncapacitated multilevel lot-sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 223-231, October.
    6. N.C. Simpson & S. Selcuk Erenguc, 2005. "Modeling multiple stage manufacturing systems with generalized costs and capacity issues," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(6), pages 560-570, September.
    7. Grubbström, Robert W. & Tang, Ou, 2012. "The space of solution alternatives in the optimal lotsizing problem for general assembly systems applying MRP theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 765-777.
    8. Wolsey, Laurence A., 1995. "Progress with single-item lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 395-401, November.
    9. Simpson, N. C., 1999. "Multiple level production planning in rolling horizon assembly environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 15-28, April.
    10. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Hande Yaman, 2012. "A Polyhedral Study of Multiechelon Lot Sizing with Intermediate Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 918-935, August.
    11. Xiao, Yiyong & Zhang, Renqian & Zhao, Qiuhong & Kaku, Ikou & Xu, Yuchun, 2014. "A variable neighborhood search with an effective local search for uncapacitated multilevel lot-sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 102-114.
    12. Joseph Geunes & H. Edwin Romeijn & Kevin Taaffe, 2006. "Requirements Planning with Pricing and Order Selection Flexibility," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 394-401, April.
    13. Ming Zhao & Minjiao Zhang, 2020. "Multiechelon Lot Sizing: New Complexities and Inequalities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 534-551, March.
    14. Elena Katok & Holly S. Lewis & Terry P. Harrison, 1998. "Lot Sizing in General Assembly Systems with Setup Costs, Setup Times, and Multiple Constrained Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 859-877, June.
    15. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Joseph Geunes, 2000. "Requirements Planning with Substitutions: Exploiting Bill-of-Materials Flexibility in Production Planning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 166-185, January.
    16. Yale T. Herer & Michal Tzur, 2001. "The dynamic transshipment problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(5), pages 386-408, August.
    17. Voros, Jozsef, 1995. "Setup cost stability region for the multi-level dynamic lot sizing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 132-141, November.
    18. Hark-Chin Hwang & Wilco van den Heuvel & Albert P. M. Wagelmans, 2023. "Multilevel Lot-Sizing with Inventory Bounds," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1470-1490, November.
    19. Jörg Homberger, 2008. "A Parallel Genetic Algorithm for the Multilevel Unconstrained Lot-Sizing Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 124-132, February.
    20. Ozelkan, Ertunga C. & Cakanyildirim, Metin, 2007. "Resource downgrading," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 572-590, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:195:y:2009:i:1:p:262-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.