IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v25y2023icp51-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining rules for F- and Beta-statistics from multiply-imputed data

Author

Listed:
  • Chaurasia, Ashok

Abstract

Missing values in data impede the task of inference for population parameters of interest. Multiple Imputation (MI) is a popular method for handling missing data since it accounts for the uncertainty of missing values. Inference in MI involves combining point and variance estimates from each imputed dataset via Rubin’s rules. A sufficient condition for these rules is that the estimator is approximately (multivariate) normally distributed. However, these traditional combining rules get computationally cumbersome for multicomponent parameters of interest, and unreliable at high rates of missingness (due to an unstable variance matrix). New combining rules for univariate F- and Beta-statistics from multiply-imputed data are proposed for decisions about multicomponent parameters. The proposed combining rules have the advantage of being computationally convenient since they only involve univariate F- and Beta-statistics, while providing the same inferential reliability as the traditional multivariate combining rules. Simulation study is conducted to demonstrate that the proposed method has good statistical properties of maintaining low type I and type II error rates at relatively large proportions of missingness. The general applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated within a lead exposure study to assess the association between lead exposure and neurological motor function.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaurasia, Ashok, 2023. "Combining rules for F- and Beta-statistics from multiply-imputed data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 51-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:25:y:2023:i:c:p:51-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.08.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306221001076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.08.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerome P. Reiter, 2007. "Small-sample degrees of freedom for multi-component significance tests with multiple imputation for missing data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(2), pages 502-508.
    2. Horton N. J. & Lipsitz S. R., 2001. "Multiple Imputation in Practice: Comparison of Software Packages for Regression Models With Missing Variables," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 55, pages 244-254, August.
    3. Ofer Harel, 2009. "The estimation of R2 and adjusted R2 in incomplete data sets using multiple imputation," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(10), pages 1109-1118.
    4. Paul T. von Hippel, 2020. "How Many Imputations Do You Need? A Two-stage Calculation Using a Quadratic Rule," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(3), pages 699-718, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Consentino, Fabrizio & Claeskens, Gerda, 2010. "Order selection tests with multiply imputed data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 2284-2295, October.
    2. repec:jss:jstsof:45:i03 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Joost R. Ginkel, 2020. "Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for $${R}^{{2}}$$R2 in Multiply Imputed Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 185-205, March.
    4. Shane S. Dikolli & John C. Heater & William J. Mayew & Mani Sethuraman, 2021. "Chief Financial Officer Co-option and Chief Executive Officer Compensation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1939-1955, March.
    5. Susanne Rässler & Regina T. Riphahn, 2006. "Survey Item Nonresponse and its Treatment," Springer Books, in: Olaf Hübler & Jachim Frohn (ed.), Modern Econometric Analysis, chapter 15, pages 215-230, Springer.
    6. Jieun Lee, 2022. "Moral Hazard on Productivity Among Work-From-Home Workers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic," Papers 2209.05684, arXiv.org.
    7. David A. Wagstaff & Ofer Harel, 2011. "A closer examination of three small-sample approximations to the multiple-imputation degrees of freedom," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 11(3), pages 403-419, September.
    8. Hu, Wei & Yang, Zhaojun & Chen, Chuanhai & Wu, Yue & Xie, Qunya, 2021. "A Weibull-based recurrent regression model for repairable systems considering double effects of operation and maintenance: A case study of machine tools," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Yajuan Si & Jerome P. Reiter, 2013. "Nonparametric Bayesian Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Categorical Variables in Large-Scale Assessment Surveys," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(5), pages 499-521, October.
    10. Franziska Meyer & Oliver Winkler, 2023. "Place of Residence Does Matter for Educational Integration: The Relevance of Spatial Contexts for Refugees’ Transition to VET in Germany," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, February.
    11. Młodak Andrzej, 2021. "An application of a complex measure to model–based imputation in business statistics," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Sarah Mustillo, 2012. "The Effects of Auxiliary Variables on Coefficient Bias and Efficiency in Multiple Imputation," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(2), pages 335-361, May.
    13. Janet MacNeil Vroomen & Iris Eekhout & Marcel G. Dijkgraaf & Hein van Hout & Sophia E. de Rooij & Martijn W. Heymans & Judith E. Bosmans, 2016. "Multiple imputation strategies for zero-inflated cost data in economic evaluations: which method works best?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(8), pages 939-950, November.
    14. David K. Blough & Scott Ramsey & Sean D. Sullivan & Roger Yusen, 2009. "The impact of using different imputation methods for missing quality of life scores on the estimation of the cost‐effectiveness of lung‐volume‐reduction surgery," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 91-101, January.
    15. Stuart R. Lipsitz & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice & Roger D. Weiss, 2020. "Using Multiple Imputation with GEE with Non-monotone Missing Longitudinal Binary Outcomes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 890-904, December.
    16. Aderiana Mutheu Mbandi & Jan R. Böhnke & Dietrich Schwela & Harry Vallack & Mike R. Ashmore & Lisa Emberson, 2019. "Estimating On-Road Vehicle Fuel Economy in Africa: A Case Study Based on an Urban Transport Survey in Nairobi, Kenya," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Yulia V. Marchenko & Jerome P. Reiter, 2009. "Improved degrees of freedom for multivariate significance tests obtained from multiply imputed, small-sample data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(3), pages 388-397, September.
    18. Dagmar Brožová & Jan Zouhar, 2022. "The effect of court-mandated mediation on the length of court proceedings in the Czech Republic," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 485-508, June.
    19. Calzolari, Giorgio & Neri, Laura, 2002. "Imputation of continuous variables missing at random using the method of simulated scores," MPRA Paper 22986, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2002.
    20. Andrea Bonfatti & Greta Pesaresi & Guglielmo Weber & Nancy Zambon, 2023. "The economic impact of the first wave of the pandemic on 50+ Europeans," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 607-659, August.
    21. Hildegard Seidl & Matthias Hunger & Reiner Leidl & Christa Meisinger & Rupert Wende & Bernhard Kuch & Rolf Holle, 2015. "Cost-effectiveness of nurse-based case management versus usual care for elderly patients with myocardial infarction: results from the KORINNA study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(6), pages 671-681, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    combining F- and Beta-statistics; combining R2; F-tests; missing data; multiple imputation; linear models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R2 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:25:y:2023:i:c:p:51-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.