IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/econom/v239y2024i2s0304407622001877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A post-screening diagnostic study for ultrahigh dimensional data

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yaowu
  • Zhou, Yeqing
  • Zhu, Liping

Abstract

We propose a consistent lack-of-fit test to assess whether replacing the original ultrahigh dimensional covariates with a given number of linear combinations results in a loss of regression information. To attenuate the spurious correlations that may inflate type-I error rates in high dimensions, we suggest to randomly split the observations into two parts. In the first part, we screen out as many irrelevant covariates as possible. This screening step helps to reduce the ultrahigh dimensionality to a moderate scale. In the second part, we perform a lack-of-fit test for conditional independence in the context of sufficient dimension reduction. In case that some important covariates are missed with a non-ignorable probability in the first screening stage, we introduce a multiple splitting procedure. We further propose a new statistic to test for conditional independence, which is shown to be n-consistent under the null and root-n-consistent under the alternative. We develop a consistent bootstrap procedure to approximate the asymptotic null distribution. The performances of our proposal are evaluated through comprehensive simulations and an empirical analysis of GDP data.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yaowu & Zhou, Yeqing & Zhu, Liping, 2024. "A post-screening diagnostic study for ultrahigh dimensional data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:econom:v:239:y:2024:i:2:s0304407622001877
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.09.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407622001877
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.09.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:econom:v:239:y:2024:i:2:s0304407622001877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jeconom .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.