IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v488y2024ics0304380023003265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The application of a plant community model to evaluate adaptation strategies for alleviating climate change impacts on grassland productivity, biodiversity and forage quality

Author

Listed:
  • Movedi, Ermes
  • Paleari, Livia
  • Argenti, Giovanni
  • Vesely, Fosco M.
  • Staglianò, Nicolina
  • Parrini, Silvia
  • Confalonieri, Roberto

Abstract

Grasslands are environments characterized by an elevated biodiversity in plant species, which dynamically evolves over time as a function of management practices, soil properties, and climate conditions. Climate change can locally affect grassland growth and floristic composition and, in turn, the quality and quantity of provided ecosystem services. We show how the use of the plant community model CoSMo allows to explicitly account for the dynamics of floristic composition as response to environmental variables. This, in turn, allows quantifying climate change impacts on grasslands growth and composition and evaluating alternative strategies to improve adaptation in the mid-term. As a case study, we focused on mountain areas in the northern Apennines (Italy), where temporary alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)-dominated grasslands are sown for the production of Parmesan cheese. Five sites and four alternative climate scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 projections as provided by the HadGEM2 and GISS general circulation models) were considered, to explore a wide range of agro-environmental conditions. Results showed that the observed dynamics of floristic composition and biomass accumulation were successfully simulated, with a mean absolute error lower than 10% for floristic composition and less than 1 t ha−1 for total biomass. Climate change impacts were globally negative, with a clear decrease of forage production as compared to the baseline (from -3.6% to -14.3% according to the climate scenario). The biodiversity of the plant community also declined (12.5% average decrease in the inverse Simpson index) due to the increase in alfalfa dominance. The latter, however, led to preserve the forage crude protein content (+0.9% on average). Guidelines for optimizing grassland productivity and forage protein under future climate were defined, mainly focused on reducing the alfalfa field duration, sowing grass-legume mixtures, and delaying the last cut of the season. These practices can be easily adopted under operational farming conditions to support the adaptation of temporary grasslands to climate change. According to our knowledge, this is one of the first study of climate change impact that uses a plant community model to explicitly considers phytocoenosis dynamics, biodiversity, and their effect on forage production (quantity and quality). Considering the role of grasslands as providers of key ecosystem services ‒ especially in marginal areas ‒ we believe that our modelling approach can support the identification of effective adaptation strategies to address future climate challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Movedi, Ermes & Paleari, Livia & Argenti, Giovanni & Vesely, Fosco M. & Staglianò, Nicolina & Parrini, Silvia & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2024. "The application of a plant community model to evaluate adaptation strategies for alleviating climate change impacts on grassland productivity, biodiversity and forage quality," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:488:y:2024:i:c:s0304380023003265
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023003265
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:488:y:2024:i:c:s0304380023003265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.