IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v473y2022ics0304380022002344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights on biodiversity drivers to predict species richness in tropical forests at the local scale

Author

Listed:
  • Mateo, Rubén G.
  • Arellano, Gabriel
  • Gómez-Rubio, Virgilio
  • Tello, J. Sebastián
  • Fuentes, Alfredo F.
  • Cayola, Leslie
  • Loza, M. Isabel
  • Cala, Victoria
  • Macía, Manuel J.

Abstract

Disentangling the relative importance of different biodiversity drivers (i.e., climate, edaphic, historical factors, or human impact) to predict plant species richness at the local scale is one of the most important challenges in ecology. Biodiversity modelling is a key tool for the integration of these drivers and the predictions generated are essential, for example, for climate change forecast and conservation planning. However, the reliability of biodiversity models at the local scale remains poorly understood, especially in tropical species-rich areas, where they are required. We inventoried all woody plants with stems ≥ 2.5 cm in 397 plots across the Andes-Amazon gradient. We generated and mapped 19 uncorrelated biodiversity drivers at 90 m resolution, grouped into four categories: microclimatic, microtopographic, anthropic, and edaphic. In order to evaluate the importance of the different categories, we grouped biodiversity drivers into four different clusters by categories. For each of the four clusters of biodiversity drivers, we modelled the observed species richness using two statistical techniques (random forest and Bayesian inference) and two modelling procedures (including or excluding a spatial component). All the biodiversity models produced were evaluated by cross-validation. Species richness was accurately predicted by random forest (Spearman correlation up to 0.85 and explained variance up to 67%). The results suggest that precipitation and temperature are important driving forces of species richness in the region. Nonetheless, a spatial component should be considered to properly predict biodiversity. This could reflect macroevolutionary underlying forces not considered here, such as colonization time, dispersal capacities, or speciation rates. However, the proposed biodiversity modelling approach can predict accurately species richness at the local scale and detailed resolution (90 m) in tropical areas, something that previous works had found extremely challenging. The innovative methodology presented here could be employed in other areas with conservation needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateo, Rubén G. & Arellano, Gabriel & Gómez-Rubio, Virgilio & Tello, J. Sebastián & Fuentes, Alfredo F. & Cayola, Leslie & Loza, M. Isabel & Cala, Victoria & Macía, Manuel J., 2022. "Insights on biodiversity drivers to predict species richness in tropical forests at the local scale," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:473:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022002344
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022002344
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman Myers & Russell A. Mittermeier & Cristina G. Mittermeier & Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca & Jennifer Kent, 2000. "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 853-858, February.
    2. Di Febbraro, Mirko & D’Amen, Manuela & Raia, Pasquale & De Rosa, Davide & Loy, Anna & Guisan, Antoine, 2018. "Using macroecological constraints on spatial biodiversity predictions under climate change: the modelling method matters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 390(C), pages 79-87.
    3. G. Mateo, Rubén & Aroca-Fernández, María José & Gastón, Aitor & Gómez-Rubio, Virgilio & Saura, Santiago & García-Viñas, Juan Ignacio, 2019. "Looking for an optimal hierarchical approach for ecologically meaningful niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Belén Fadrique & Selene Báez & Álvaro Duque & Agustina Malizia & Cecilia Blundo & Julieta Carilla & Oriana Osinaga-Acosta & Lucio Malizia & Miles Silman & William Farfán-Ríos & Yadvinder Malhi & Kenne, 2018. "Widespread but heterogeneous responses of Andean forests to climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 564(7735), pages 207-212, December.
    5. Rubén G Mateo & Ángel M Felicísimo & Julien Pottier & Antoine Guisan & Jesús Muñoz, 2012. "Do Stacked Species Distribution Models Reflect Altitudinal Diversity Patterns?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, March.
    6. Håvard Rue & Sara Martino & Nicolas Chopin, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 319-392, April.
    7. Finn Lindgren & Håvard Rue & Johan Lindström, 2011. "An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(4), pages 423-498, September.
    8. Moreno-Amat, Elena & Mateo, Rubén G. & Nieto-Lugilde, Diego & Morueta-Holme, Naia & Svenning, Jens-Christian & García-Amorena, Ignacio, 2015. "Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 308-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Mateo, Rubén & Aroca-Fernández, María José & Gastón, Aitor & Gómez-Rubio, Virgilio & Saura, Santiago & García-Viñas, Juan Ignacio, 2019. "Looking for an optimal hierarchical approach for ecologically meaningful niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    3. Yuan Yan & Eva Cantoni & Chris Field & Margaret Treble & Joanna Mills Flemming, 2023. "Spatiotemporal modeling of mature‐at‐length data using a sliding window approach," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), March.
    4. Daniel Cervone & Alex D’Amour & Luke Bornn & Kirk Goldsberry, 2016. "A Multiresolution Stochastic Process Model for Predicting Basketball Possession Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 585-599, April.
    5. Jonathan Wakefield & Taylor Okonek & Jon Pedersen, 2020. "Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 398-418, August.
    6. Daniela Castro-Camilo & Raphaël Huser & Håvard Rue, 2019. "A Spliced Gamma-Generalized Pareto Model for Short-Term Extreme Wind Speed Probabilistic Forecasting," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 517-534, September.
    7. Athanasios C. Micheas & Jiaxun Chen, 2018. "sppmix: Poisson point process modeling using normal mixture models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1767-1798, December.
    8. Jacqueline D. Seufert & Andre Python & Christoph Weisser & Elías Cisneros & Krisztina Kis‐Katos & Thomas Kneib, 2022. "Mapping ex ante risks of COVID‐19 in Indonesia using a Bayesian geostatistical model on airport network data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2121-2155, October.
    9. Zhang, Shen & Liu, Xin & Tang, Jinjun & Cheng, Shaowu & Qi, Yong & Wang, Yinhai, 2018. "Spatio-temporal modeling of destination choice behavior through the Bayesian hierarchical approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 537-551.
    10. Zammit-Mangion, Andrew & Rougier, Jonathan, 2018. "A sparse linear algebra algorithm for fast computation of prediction variances with Gaussian Markov random fields," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 116-130.
    11. Paige, John & Fuglstad, Geir-Arne & Riebler, Andrea & Wakefield, Jon, 2022. "Bayesian multiresolution modeling of georeferenced data: An extension of ‘LatticeKrig’," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Fasil Wagnew & Kefyalew Addis Alene & Matthew Kelly & Darren Gray, 2023. "Geospatial Overlap of Undernutrition and Tuberculosis in Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(21), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Márcio Poletti Laurini, 2017. "A spatial error model with continuous random effects and an application to growth convergence," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 371-398, October.
    14. Somnath Chaudhuri & Gerard Giménez-Adsuar & Marc Saez & Maria A. Barceló, 2022. "PandemonCAT: Monitoring the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Michela Cameletti & Finn Lindgren & Daniel Simpson & Håvard Rue, 2013. "Spatio-temporal modeling of particulate matter concentration through the SPDE approach," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 97(2), pages 109-131, April.
    16. Duque-Lazo, J. & van Gils, H. & Groen, T.A. & Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M., 2016. "Transferability of species distribution models: The case of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Southwest Spain and Southwest Australia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 62-70.
    17. Aaron Osgood‐Zimmerman & Jon Wakefield, 2023. "A Statistical Review of Template Model Builder: A Flexible Tool for Spatial Modelling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 318-342, August.
    18. Daniel Vélez-Serrano & Alejandro Álvaro-Meca & Fernando Sebastián-Huerta & Jose Vélez-Serrano, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Traffic Flow Prediction in Madrid: An Application of Residual Convolutional Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Jonathan Bradley & Noel Cressie & Tao Shi, 2015. "Comparing and selecting spatial predictors using local criteria," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Matthew J. Heaton & Abhirup Datta & Andrew O. Finley & Reinhard Furrer & Joseph Guinness & Rajarshi Guhaniyogi & Florian Gerber & Robert B. Gramacy & Dorit Hammerling & Matthias Katzfuss & Finn Lindgr, 2019. "A Case Study Competition Among Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 398-425, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:473:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022002344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.