IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v377y2018icp1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An epidemiological model of virus transmission in salmonid fishes of the Columbia River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Ferguson, Paige F.B.
  • Breyta, Rachel
  • Brito, Ilana
  • Kurath, Gael
  • LaDeau, Shannon L.

Abstract

We have developed a dynamic epidemiological model informed by records of viral presence and genotypes to evaluate potential transmission routes maintaining a viral pathogen in economically and culturally important anadromous fish populations. In the Columbia River Basin, infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) causes severe disease, predominantly in juvenile steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and less frequently in Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha). Mortality events following IHNV infection can be devastating for individual hatchery programs. Despite reports of high local mortality and extensive surveillance efforts, there are questions about how viral transmission is maintained. Modeling this system offers important insights into disease transmission in natural aquatic systems, as well as about the data requirements for generating accurate estimates about transmission routes and infection probabilities. We simulated six scenarios in which testing rates and the relative importance of different transmission routes varied. The simulations demonstrated that the model accurately identified routes of transmission and inferred infection probabilities accurately when there was testing of all cohort-sites. When testing records were incomplete, the model accurately inferred which transmission routes exposed particular cohort-sites but generated biased infection probabilities given exposure. After validating the model and generating guidelines for result interpretation, we applied the model to data from 14 annual cohorts (2000–2013) at 24 focal sites in a sub-region of the Columbia River Basin, the lower Columbia River (LCR), to quantify the relative importance of potential transmission routes in this focal sub-region. We demonstrate that exposure to IHNV via the return migration of adult fish is an important route for maintaining IHNV in the LCR sub-region, and the probability of infection following this exposure was relatively high at 0.16. Although only 1% of cohort-sites experienced self-exposure by infected juvenile fish, this transmission route had the greatest probability of infection (0.22). Increased testing and/or determining whether transmission can occur from cohort-sites without testing records (e.g., determining there was no testing record because there were no fish at the cohort-site) are expected to improve inference about infection probabilities. Increased use of secure water supplies and continued use of biosecurity protocols may reduce IHNV transmission from adult fish and juvenile fish within the site, respectively, to juvenile salmonids at hatcheries. Models and conclusions from this study are potentially relevant to understanding the relative importance of transmission routes for other important aquatic pathogens in salmonids, including the agents of bacterial kidney disease and coldwater disease, and the basic approach may be useful for other pathogens and hosts in other geographic regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferguson, Paige F.B. & Breyta, Rachel & Brito, Ilana & Kurath, Gael & LaDeau, Shannon L., 2018. "An epidemiological model of virus transmission in salmonid fishes of the Columbia River Basin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 377(C), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:377:y:2018:i:c:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018300784
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sturtz, Sibylle & Ligges, Uwe & Gelman, Andrew, 2005. "R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lachaud, Michée A. & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 2022. "A Bayesian statistical analysis of return to agricultural R&D investment in Latin America: Implications for food security," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Yu, Jun, 2012. "A semiparametric stochastic volatility model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 473-482.
    3. Liang, Zhongyao & Qian, Song S. & Wu, Sifeng & Chen, Huili & Liu, Yong & Yu, Yanhong & Yi, Xuan, 2019. "Using Bayesian change point model to enhance understanding of the shifting nutrients-phytoplankton relationship," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 120-126.
    4. Qian Wu & Monique Vanerum & Anouk Agten & Andrés Christiansen & Frank Vandenabeele & Jean-Michel Rigo & Rianne Janssen, 2021. "Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 518-543, June.
    5. Horrocks, Julie & Rueffer, Matthew, 2014. "A Bayesian approach to estimating animal density from binary acoustic transects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 17-25.
    6. Sakshaug Joseph W. & Wiśniowski Arkadiusz & Ruiz Diego Andres Perez & Blom Annelies G., 2019. "Supplementing Small Probability Samples with Nonprobability Samples: A Bayesian Approach," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 653-681, September.
    7. Eugenia Buta & Stephanie S. O’Malley & Ralitza Gueorguieva, 2018. "Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal data on abstinence, frequency and intensity of drinking in alcoholism trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(3), pages 869-888, June.
    8. Millington, James D.A. & Walters, Michael B. & Matonis, Megan S. & Liu, Jianguo, 2013. "Filling the gap: A compositional gap regeneration model for managed northern hardwood forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 17-27.
    9. Marc Marí-Dell’Olmo & Miguel Ángel Martínez-Beneito, 2015. "A Multilevel Regression Model for Geographical Studies in Sets of Non-Adjacent Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Zhao, Qing & Boomer, G. Scott & Silverman, Emily & Fleming, Kathy, 2017. "Accounting for the temporal variation of spatial effect improves inference and projection of population dynamics models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 252-259.
    11. Adrian D Vickers & Claire Ainsworth & Reema Mody & Annika Bergman & Caroline S Ling & Jasmina Medjedovic & Michael Smyth, 2016. "Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis: Comparative Efficacy of Biologics in the Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Marco Gramatica & Peter Congdon & Silvia Liverani, 2021. "Bayesian modelling for spatially misaligned health areal data: A multiple membership approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 645-666, June.
    13. Yong Li & Zeng Tao & Jun Yu, "undated". "Robust Deviance Information Criterion for Latent Variable Models," Working Papers CoFie-04-2012, Singapore Management University, Sim Kee Boon Institute for Financial Economics.
    14. repec:jss:jstsof:36:c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Abadi, Fitsum & Gimenez, Olivier & Jakober, Hans & Stauber, Wolfgang & Arlettaz, Raphaël & Schaub, Michael, 2012. "Estimating the strength of density dependence in the presence of observation errors using integrated population models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1-9.
    16. Leandro García Barrado & Els Coart & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2017. "Estimation of diagnostic accuracy of a combination of continuous biomarkers allowing for conditional dependence between the biomarkers and the imperfect reference-test," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 646-655, June.
    17. Shirin Moghaddam & John Newell & John Hinde, 2022. "A Bayesian Approach for Imputation of Censored Survival Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Alina Jędrzejczak & Jan Kubacki, 2016. "Small Area Estimation of Income Under Spatial Sar Model," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 17(3), pages 365-390, September.
    19. Będowska-Sójka, Barbara & Kliber, Agata, 2022. "Can cryptocurrencies hedge oil price fluctuations? A pandemic perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Earl W Duncan & Kerrie L Mengersen, 2020. "Comparing Bayesian spatial models: Goodness-of-smoothing criteria for assessing under- and over-smoothing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
    21. repec:jss:jstsof:40:i05 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Guy Abel & Jakub Bijak & Jonathan J. Forster & James Raymer & Peter W.F. Smith & Jackie S.T. Wong, 2013. "Integrating uncertainty in time series population forecasts: An illustration using a simple projection model," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(43), pages 1187-1226.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:377:y:2018:i:c:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.