IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v320y2016icp299-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discriminating between possible foraging decisions using pattern-oriented modelling: The case of pink-footed geese in Mid-Norway during their spring migration

Author

Listed:
  • Chudzińska, Magda
  • Ayllón, Daniel
  • Madsen, Jesper
  • Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob

Abstract

Foraging decisions and their energetic consequences are critical to capital Arctic-breeders migrating in steps, because there is only a narrow time window with optimal foraging conditions at each step. Optimal foraging theory predicts that such animals should spend more time in patches that enable them to maximise the net rate of energy and nutrient gain. The type of search strategy employed by animals is, however, expected to depend on the amount of information that is involved in the search process. In highly dynamic landscapes, animals are unlikely to have complete knowledge about the distribution of the resources, which makes them unable to forage on the patches that enable them to maximise their net energy intake. Random search may, however, be a good strategy in landscapes where patches with profitable resources are abundant. We present simulation experiments using an individual-based model (IBM) to test which foraging decision rule (FDR) best reproduces the population patterns observed in pink-footed geese during spring staging in an agricultural landscape in Mid-Norway. Our results suggested that while geese employed a random search strategy, they were also able to individually learn where the most profitable patches were located and return to the patches that resulted in highest energy intake. Such asocial learning is rarely reported for flock animals. The modelled geese did not benefit from group foraging, which contradicts the results reported by most studies on flocking birds. Geese also did not possess complete knowledge about the profitability of the available habitat. Most likely, there is no one single optimal foraging strategy for capital breeders but such strategy is site and species-specific. We discussed the potential use of the model as a valuable tool for making future risk assessments of human disturbance and changes in agricultural practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Chudzińska, Magda & Ayllón, Daniel & Madsen, Jesper & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob, 2016. "Discriminating between possible foraging decisions using pattern-oriented modelling: The case of pink-footed geese in Mid-Norway during their spring migration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 299-315.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:320:y:2016:i:c:p:299-315
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015004639
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. M. Viswanathan & Sergey V. Buldyrev & Shlomo Havlin & M. G. E. da Luz & E. P. Raposo & H. Eugene Stanley, 1999. "Optimizing the success of random searches," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6756), pages 911-914, October.
    2. Olivier Duriez & Silke Bauer & Anne Destin & Jesper Madsen & Bart A. Nolet & Richard A. Stillman & Marcel Klaassen, 2009. "What decision rules might pink-footed geese use to depart on migration? An individual-based model," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 560-569.
    3. Frank, Béatrice M. & Baret, Philippe V., 2013. "Simulating brown trout demogenetics in a river/nursery brook system: The individual-based model DemGenTrout," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 184-202.
    4. Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Sibly, Richard M. & Tougaard, Jakob & Teilmann, Jonas & Sveegaard, Signe, 2014. "Effects of noise and by-catch on a Danish harbour porpoise population," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 242-251.
    5. Jan C. Thiele & Winfried Kurth & Volker Grimm, 2014. "Facilitating Parameter Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of Agent-Based Models: A Cookbook Using NetLogo and 'R'," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 17(3), pages 1-11.
    6. Kułakowska, K.A. & Kułakowski, T.M. & Inglis, I.R. & Smith, G.C. & Haynes, P.J. & Prosser, P. & Thorbek, P. & Sibly, R.M., 2014. "Using an individual-based model to select among alternative foraging strategies of woodpigeons: Data support a memory-based model with a flocking mechanism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 280(C), pages 89-101.
    7. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Polhill, J. Gary & Giske, Jarl & Railsback, Steven F., 2010. "The ODD protocol: A review and first update," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2760-2768.
    8. Olsson, Ola & Brown, Joel S. & Helf, Kurt L., 2008. "A guide to central place effects in foraging," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 22-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wood, Kevin A. & Hilton, Geoff M. & Newth, Julia L. & Rees, Eileen C., 2019. "Seasonal variation in energy gain explains patterns of resource use by avian herbivores in an agricultural landscape: Insights from a mechanistic model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 409(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Wood, Kevin A. & Stillman, Richard A. & Newth, Julia L. & Nuijten, Rascha J.M. & Hilton, Geoff M. & Nolet, Bart A. & Rees, Eileen C., 2021. "Predicting avian herbivore responses to changing food availability and competition," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    3. Malishev, Matthew & Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie, 2021. "Movement, models, and metabolism: Individual-based energy budget models as next-generation extensions for predicting animal movement outcomes across scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    4. Chudzinska, Magda & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Smout, Sophie & Aarts, Geert & Brasseur, Sophie & Graham, Isla & Thompson, Paul & McConnell, Bernie, 2021. "AgentSeal: Agent-based model describing movement of marine central-place foragers," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    5. Casey C Day & Nicholas P McCann & Patrick A Zollner & Jonathan H Gilbert & David M MacFarland, 2019. "Temporal plasticity in habitat selection criteria explains patterns of animal dispersal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(2), pages 528-540.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayllón, Daniel & Railsback, Steven F. & Vincenzi, Simone & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Almodóvar, Ana & Grimm, Volker, 2016. "InSTREAM-Gen: Modelling eco-evolutionary dynamics of trout populations under anthropogenic environmental change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 36-53.
    2. Malishev, Matthew & Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie, 2021. "Movement, models, and metabolism: Individual-based energy budget models as next-generation extensions for predicting animal movement outcomes across scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    3. de Jager, Monique & Hengeveld, Geerten M. & Mooij, Wolf M. & Slooten, Elisabeth, 2019. "Modelling the spatial dynamics of Maui dolphins using individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 59-65.
    4. van der Vaart, Elske & Johnston, Alice S.A. & Sibly, Richard M., 2016. "Predicting how many animals will be where: How to build, calibrate and evaluate individual-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 113-123.
    5. Chudzinska, Magda & Dupont, Yoko L. & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Maia, Kate P. & Henriksen, Marie V. & Rasmussen, Claus & Kissling, W. Daniel & Hagen, Melanie & Trøjelsgaard, Kristian, 2020. "Combining the strengths of agent-based modelling and network statistics to understand animal movement and interactions with resources: example from within-patch foraging decisions of bumblebees," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    6. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    7. Watson, Joseph W & Boyd, Robin & Dutta, Ritabrata & Vasdekis, Georgios & Walker, Nicola D. & Roy, Shovonlal & Everitt, Richard & Hyder, Kieran & Sibly, Richard M, 2022. "Incorporating environmental variability in a spatially-explicit individual-based model of European sea bass✰," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    8. Rougier, Thibaud & Drouineau, Hilaire & Dumoulin, Nicolas & Faure, Thierry & Deffuant, Guillaume & Rochard, Eric & Lambert, Patrick, 2014. "The GR3D model, a tool to explore the Global Repositioning Dynamics of Diadromous fish Distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 31-44.
    9. Troost, Christian & Huber, Robert & Bell, Andrew R. & van Delden, Hedwig & Filatova, Tatiana & Le, Quang Bao & Lippe, Melvin & Niamir, Leila & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Berger, Thomas, 2023. "How to keep it adequate: A protocol for ensuring validity in agent-based simulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 159, pages 1-21.
    10. Medeiros-Sousa, Antônio Ralph & Laporta, Gabriel Zorello & Mucci, Luis Filipe & Marrelli, Mauro Toledo, 2022. "Epizootic dynamics of yellow fever in forest fragments: An agent-based model to explore the influence of vector and host parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    11. Brinkmann, Katja & Kübler, Daniel & Liehr, Stefan & Buerkert, Andreas, 2021. "Agent-based modelling of the social-ecological nature of poverty traps in southwestern Madagascar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Halsey, Samniqueka J. & Miller, James R., 2018. "A spatial agent-based model of the disease vector Ixodes scapularis to explore host-tick associations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 96-106.
    13. Grant, Tyler J. & Parry, Hazel R. & Zalucki, Myron P. & Bradbury, Steven P., 2018. "Predicting monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) movement and egg-laying with a spatially-explicit agent-based model: The role of monarch perceptual range and spatial memory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 374(C), pages 37-50.
    14. Stenglein, Jennifer L. & Gilbert, Jonathan H. & Wydeven, Adrian P. & Van Deelen, Timothy R., 2015. "An individual-based model for southern Lake Superior wolves: A tool to explore the effect of human-caused mortality on a landscape of risk," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 302(C), pages 13-24.
    15. Yi Tang & Mingyu Liu & Zhanli Sun, 2020. "Indirect Effects of Grazing on Wind-Dispersed Elm Seeds in Sparse Woodlands of Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Yoak, Andrew J. & Reece, John F. & Gehrt, Stanley D. & Hamilton, Ian M., 2016. "Optimizing free-roaming dog control programs using agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 53-61.
    17. Langhammer, Maria & Grimm, Volker, 2020. "Mitigating bioenergy-driven biodiversity decline: A modelling approach with the European brown hare," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 416(C).
    18. Neil, Emily & Madsen, Jens Koed & Carrella, Ernesto & Payette, Nicolas & Bailey, Richard, 2020. "Agent-based modelling as a tool for elephant poaching mitigation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
    19. Lapp, Maya & Long, Colby, 2022. "A new approach to agent-based models of Community Resource Management based on the analysis of cheating, monitoring, and sanctioning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    20. Boeing, Geoff, 2018. "The Effects of Inequality, Density, and Heterogeneous Residential Preferences on Urban Displacement and Metropolitan Structure: An Agent-Based Model," SocArXiv mkq7d, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:320:y:2016:i:c:p:299-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.