IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v295y2015icp151-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecosystem assessment and management as key tools for sustainable landscape development: A case study of the Ore Mountains region in Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Grunewald, Karsten
  • Bastian, Olaf

Abstract

Principles of sustainability were mentioned for the very first time in the Ore Mountains in Central Europe some 300 years ago, triggered by the shortage of timber. Always new problems and challenges occurred throughout history caused by changes in ecosystems, which influenced sustainability aspects. This region was marked by drastic environmental impacts, particularly strong SO2 immissions in the second half of the 20th century. Since the political transformation of 1989, both air quality and the functioning and integrity of ecosystems have improved and the rehabilitation of the destroyed forests and degraded peatbogs has begun. The ups and downs of landscape development, in particular the crises in the human–environment relationship in the region, were not only associated with changes in the ecosystem, but also with a process of gaining and structuring knowledge, concept development, and communications. In this paper, we provide a framework for assessing sustainable land use management, and to demonstrate it by way of examples of successful implementation in the Ore Mountains region. In this context we will focus on such important ecological approaches as the concepts of ecosystem research, ecological indicators, ecological integrity, and ecosystem services. Thus, we describe the demand for integrating available knowledge into conceptual approaches, and moving into implementation procedures by means of integrated land management.

Suggested Citation

  • Grunewald, Karsten & Bastian, Olaf, 2015. "Ecosystem assessment and management as key tools for sustainable landscape development: A case study of the Ore Mountains region in Central Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 151-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:295:y:2015:i:c:p:151-162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014003949
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald T. Monteith & John L. Stoddard & Christopher D. Evans & Heleen A. de Wit & Martin Forsius & Tore Høgåsen & Anders Wilander & Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle & Dean S. Jeffries & Jussi Vuorenmaa & Bill Kel, 2007. "Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7169), pages 537-540, November.
    2. Müller, Felix & Burkhard, Benjamin, 2012. "The indicator side of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 26-30.
    3. C. Freeman & C. D. Evans & D. T. Monteith & B. Reynolds & N. Fenner, 2001. "Export of organic carbon from peat soils," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6849), pages 785-785, August.
    4. Bastian, Olaf & Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe & Rosenberg, Matthias & Rahe, Doreen & Grunewald, Karsten, 2013. "The five pillar EPPS framework for quantifying, mapping and managing ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 15-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshioka, Hidekazu & Yaegashi, Yuta, 2019. "A finite difference scheme for variational inequalities arising in stochastic control problems with several singular control variables," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 40-66.
    2. Picchi, Paolo & van Lierop, Martina & Geneletti, Davide & Stremke, Sven, 2019. "Advancing the relationship between renewable energy and ecosystem services for landscape planning and design: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-259.
    3. Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Constantina Alina Hossu & Simona Raluca Grădinaru & Andreea Nita & Mihai-Sorin Stupariu & Alina Huzui-Stoiculescu & Athanasios-Alexandru Gavrilidis, 2020. "A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Yang, Yuangen & He, Zhenli & Wang, Yanbo & Fan, Jinghua & Liang, Zhanbei & Stoffella, Peter J., 2013. "Dissolved organic matter in relation to nutrients (N and P) and heavy metals in surface runoff water as affected by temporal variation and land uses – A case study from Indian River Area, south Florid," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 38-49.
    3. Ianis Delpla & Donald T. Monteith & Chris Freeman & Joris Haftka & Joop Hermens & Timothy G. Jones & Estelle Baurès & Aude-Valérie Jung & Olivier Thomas, 2014. "A Decision Support System for Drinking Water Production Integrating Health Risks Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2014. "Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 124-132.
    5. Gerner, Nadine V. & Nafo, Issa & Winking, Caroline & Wencki, Kristina & Strehl, Clemens & Wortberg, Timo & Niemann, André & Anzaldua, Gerardo & Lago, Manuel & Birk, Sebastian, 2018. "Large-scale river restoration pays off: A case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 327-338.
    6. Elena Cervelli & Ester Scotto di Perta & Stefania Pindozzi, 2020. "Identification of Marginal Landscapes as Support for Sustainable Development: GIS-Based Analysis and Landscape Metrics Assessment in Southern Italy Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Braat, Leon C. & de Groot, Rudolf, 2012. "The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 4-15.
    8. Vargas-Hernández José G. & Rakowska Joanna & Vargas-González Omar C., 2022. "Green Economic Development as the Framework for Green Finance and Green Investment," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 15(3), pages 304-322, September.
    9. Brzoska, P. & Grunewald, K. & Bastian, O., 2021. "A multi-criteria analytical method to assess ecosystem services at urban site level, exemplified by two German city districts," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    10. Yılmaz, Merve & Terzi, Fatih, 2021. "Measuring the patterns of urban spatial growth of coastal cities in developing countries by geospatial metrics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Heink, Ulrich & Jax, Kurt, 2019. "Going Upstream — How the Purpose of a Conceptual Framework for Ecosystem Services Determines Its Structure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 264-271.
    12. J Timothy Wootton & Catherine A Pfister, 2012. "Carbon System Measurements and Potential Climatic Drivers at a Site of Rapidly Declining Ocean pH," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Jacobs, Sander & Burkhard, Benjamin & Van Daele, Toon & Staes, Jan & Schneiders, Anik, 2015. "‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 21-30.
    14. D’Amato, D. & Li, N. & Rekola, M. & Toppinen, A. & Lu, F-F., 2015. "Linking forest ecosystem services to corporate sustainability disclosure: A conceptual analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 170-178.
    15. Jafarzadeh, Ali Akbar & Mahdavi, Ali & Shamsi, Seyed Rashid Fallah & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2021. "Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Karimi, Azadeh & Yazdandad, Hossein & Fagerholm, Nora, 2020. "Evaluating social perceptions of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and land management: Trade-offs, synergies and implications for landscape planning and management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    17. Aslaksen, Iulie & Nybø, Signe & Framstad, Erik & Garnåsjordet, Per Arild & Skarpaas, Olav, 2015. "Biodiversity and ecosystem services: The Nature Index for Norway," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 108-116.
    18. Lopes, Rita & Videira, Nuno, 2017. "Modelling feedback processes underpinning management of ecosystem services: The role of participatory systems mapping," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 28-42.
    19. Jutras, Marie-France & Nasr, Mina & Castonguay, Mark & Pit, Christopher & Pomeroy, Joseph H. & Smith, Todd P. & Zhang, Cheng-fu & Ritchie, Charles D. & Meng, Fan-Rui & Clair, Thomas A. & Arp, Paul A., 2011. "Dissolved organic carbon concentrations and fluxes in forest catchments and streams: DOC-3 model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2291-2313.
    20. van den Belt, Marjan & Stevens, Sharon M., 2016. "Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of Ecosystem Services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 60-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:295:y:2015:i:c:p:151-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.