IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v277y2014icp77-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating catchment properties in small scale species distribution models of stream macroinvertebrates

Author

Listed:
  • Kuemmerlen, Mathias
  • Schmalz, Britta
  • Guse, Björn
  • Cai, Qinghua
  • Fohrer, Nicola
  • Jähnig, Sonja C.

Abstract

Species distribution models are increasingly applied to freshwater ecosystems. Most applications use large scales, coarse resolutions and anthropocentric modelling extents, thus not being able to consider important environmental predictors and ecological processes detectable within a catchment and at finer scales. Moreover, high resolution predictions of species distribution in streams can help improve our understanding of how environmental variables within a catchment affect the distribution of stream macroinvertebrates. We built models at a resolution of 25m×25m for a 488km2 catchment in northern Germany to determine whether the spatial approach in which environmental predictors are implemented in the model affects the overall performance. We used predictors from four different categories relevant to freshwater ecosystems: bioclimatic, topographic, hydrologic and land use. Two spatial approaches were tested: a local one, or grid based and a cumulative for the upstream area, or subcatchment specific. Models were evaluated in terms of model performance and accuracy in order to identify the approach best suited for each category, as well as the most important predictor in each. In the case of the land use category, the subcatchment approach made a significant difference, increasing performance. A final model, calibrated with the selected predictors, resulted in the highest model performance and accuracy. Our results indicate that species distribution models perform well and are accurate at high resolutions, within small catchments. We conclude that catchment wide models, especially when using predictors from multiple categories, have the potential to significantly improve modelling framework of species distribution in freshwater ecosystems. The information produced by accurate, small scale, species distribution models can guide managers and conservation practitioners, by predicting the effects of management decisions within a catchment. We suggest that highly resolved predictors be applied in models using the catchment approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuemmerlen, Mathias & Schmalz, Britta & Guse, Björn & Cai, Qinghua & Fohrer, Nicola & Jähnig, Sonja C., 2014. "Integrating catchment properties in small scale species distribution models of stream macroinvertebrates," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 277(C), pages 77-86.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:277:y:2014:i:c:p:77-86
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014000635
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hopkins, Robert L. & Burr, Brooks M., 2009. "Modeling freshwater fish distributions using multiscale landscape data: A case study of six narrow range endemics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(17), pages 2024-2034.
    2. Lam, Q.D. & Schmalz, B. & Fohrer, N., 2010. "Modelling point and diffuse source pollution of nitrate in a rural lowland catchment using the SWAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 317-325, February.
    3. Stokland, Jogeir N. & Halvorsen, Rune & Støa, Bente, 2011. "Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1800-1809.
    4. Domisch, Sami & Kuemmerlen, Mathias & Jähnig, Sonja C. & Haase, Peter, 2013. "Choice of study area and predictors affect habitat suitability projections, but not the performance of species distribution models of stream biota," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 1-10.
    5. VanDerWal, Jeremy & Shoo, Luke P. & Graham, Catherine & Williams, Stephen E., 2009. "Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(4), pages 589-594.
    6. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabrina Lai & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2018. "Implementing Green Infrastructures beyond Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Schmidt, Heiko & Radinger, Johannes & Teschlade, Daniel & Stoll, Stefan, 2020. "The role of spatial units in modelling freshwater fish distributions: Comparing a subcatchment and river network approach using MaxEnt," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    3. Pletterbauer, Florian & Graf, Wolfram & Schmutz, Stefan, 2016. "Effect of biotic dependencies in species distribution models: The future distribution of Thymallus thymallus under consideration of Allogamus auricollis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 327(C), pages 95-104.
    4. Kärcher, Oskar & Frank, Karin & Walz, Ariane & Markovic, Danijela, 2019. "Scale effects on the performance of niche-based models of freshwater fish distributions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 33-42.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iturbide, Maialen & Bedia, Joaquín & Herrera, Sixto & del Hierro, Oscar & Pinto, Miriam & Gutiérrez, Jose Manuel, 2015. "A framework for species distribution modelling with improved pseudo-absence generation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 166-174.
    2. Liang, Wanwan & Papeş, Monica & Tran, Liem & Grant, Jerome & Washington-Allen, Robert & Stewart, Scott & Wiggins, Gregory, 2018. "The effect of pseudo-absence selection method on transferability of species distribution models in the context of non-adaptive niche shift," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Coro, Gianpaolo & Pagano, Pasquale & Ellenbroek, Anton, 2013. "Combining simulated expert knowledge with Neural Networks to produce Ecological Niche Models for Latimeria chalumnae," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 55-63.
    4. Halvorsen, Rune & Mazzoni, Sabrina & Dirksen, John Wirkola & Næsset, Erik & Gobakken, Terje & Ohlson, Mikael, 2016. "How important are choice of model selection method and spatial autocorrelation of presence data for distribution modelling by MaxEnt?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 108-118.
    5. Markovic, Danijela & Walz, Ariane & Kärcher, Oskar, 2019. "Scale effects on the performance of niche-based models of freshwater fish distributions: Local vs. upstream area influences," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    6. Reside, April E. & Watson, Ian & VanDerWal, Jeremy & Kutt, Alex S., 2011. "Incorporating low-resolution historic species location data decreases performance of distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(18), pages 3444-3448.
    7. Stokland, Jogeir N. & Halvorsen, Rune & Støa, Bente, 2011. "Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1800-1809.
    8. Domisch, Sami & Kuemmerlen, Mathias & Jähnig, Sonja C. & Haase, Peter, 2013. "Choice of study area and predictors affect habitat suitability projections, but not the performance of species distribution models of stream biota," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Muñoz-Mas, R. & Martínez-Capel, F. & Alcaraz-Hernández, J.D. & Mouton, A.M., 2015. "Can multilayer perceptron ensembles model the ecological niche of freshwater fish species?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 72-81.
    10. Pelayo Acevedo & Alberto Jiménez-Valverde & Jorge M. Lobo & Raimundo Real, 2017. "Predictor weighting and geographical background delimitation: two synergetic sources of uncertainty when assessing species sensitivity to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 131-143, November.
    11. Kärcher, Oskar & Frank, Karin & Walz, Ariane & Markovic, Danijela, 2019. "Scale effects on the performance of niche-based models of freshwater fish distributions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 33-42.
    12. Bennetsen, Elina & Gobeyn, Sacha & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2016. "Species distribution models grounded in ecological theory for decision support in river management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Ben Wielstra & Wouter Beukema & Jan W Arntzen & Andrew K Skidmore & Albertus G Toxopeus & Niels Raes, 2012. "Corresponding Mitochondrial DNA and Niche Divergence for Crested Newt Candidate Species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-5, September.
    14. Abel Chemura & Dumisani Kutywayo & Danisile Hikwa & Christoph Gornott, 2022. "Climate change and cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) production: assessing impacts and potential adaptation strategies in Zimbabwe," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Boykin, Kenneth G. & Thompson, Bruce C. & Propeck-Gray, Suzanne, 2010. "Accuracy of gap analysis habitat models in predicting physical features for wildlife-habitat associations in the southwest U.S," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2769-2775.
    16. Alsamadisi, Adam G. & Tran, Liem T. & Papeş, Monica, 2020. "Employing inferences across scales: Integrating spatial data with different resolutions to enhance Maxent models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    17. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    18. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    19. Bossa, A.Y. & Diekkrüger, B. & Giertz, S. & Steup, G. & Sintondji, L.O. & Agbossou, E.K. & Hiepe, C., 2012. "Modeling the effects of crop patterns and management scenarios on N and P loads to surface water and groundwater in a semi-humid catchment (West Africa)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 20-37.
    20. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:277:y:2014:i:c:p:77-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.