IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i9p1232-1240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the spatial structure of forest stands by multivariate point processes with hierarchical interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Grabarnik, Pavel
  • Särkkä, Aila

Abstract

A stochastic model is applied to describe the spatial structure of a forest stand. We aim at quantifying the strength of the competition process between the trees in terms of interaction within and between different size classes of trees using multivariate Gibbs point processes with hierarchical interactions introduced in [Högmander, H., Särkkä, A., 1999. Multitype spatial point patterns with hierarchical interactions. Biometrics 55, 1051–1058]. The new model overcomes the main limitation of the traditional use of the Gibbs models allowing to describe systems with non-symmetric interactions between different objects. When analyzing interactions between neighbouring trees it is natural to assume that the size of a tree determines its hierarchical level: the largest trees are not influenced by any other trees than the trees in the same size class, while trees in the other size classes are influenced by the other trees in the same class as well as by all larger trees. In this paper, we describe a wide range of Gibbs models with both hierarchical and non-hierarchical interactions as well as a simulation algorithm and a parameter estimation procedure for the hierarchical models. We apply the hierarchical interaction model to the analysis of forest data consisting of locations and diameters of tree stems.

Suggested Citation

  • Grabarnik, Pavel & Särkkä, Aila, 2009. "Modelling the spatial structure of forest stands by multivariate point processes with hierarchical interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(9), pages 1232-1240.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:9:p:1232-1240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.02.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009001537
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.02.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tscheschel, A. & Stoyan, D., 2006. "Statistical reconstruction of random point patterns," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 859-871, November.
    2. Sarkka, Aila & Renshaw, Eric, 2006. "The analysis of marked point patterns evolving through space and time," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1698-1718, December.
    3. A. Baddeley & M. Lieshout, 1995. "Area-interaction point processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 47(4), pages 601-619, December.
    4. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cronie, Ottmar & Särkkä, Aila, 2011. "Some edge correction methods for marked spatio-temporal point process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2209-2220, July.
    2. T. Rajala & D. J. Murrell & S. C. Olhede, 2018. "Detecting multivariate interactions in spatial point patterns with Gibbs models and variable selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1237-1273, November.
    3. Genet, Astrid & Grabarnik, Pavel & Sekretenko, Olga & Pothier, David, 2014. "Incorporating the mechanisms underlying inter-tree competition into a random point process model to improve spatial tree pattern analysis in forestry," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 143-154.
    4. Lister, Andrew J. & Leites, Laura P., 2018. "Modeling and simulation of tree spatial patterns in an oak-hickory forest with a modular, hierarchical spatial point process framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 378(C), pages 37-45.
    5. Nakagawa, Yoshiaki & Yokozawa, Masayuki & Hara, Toshihiko, 2015. "Competition among plants can lead to an increase in aggregation of smaller plants around larger ones," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 41-53.
    6. Ivan N. Kutyavin & Alexei V. Manov, 2022. "Spatial relationships of trees in middle taiga post-pyrogenic pine forest stands in the European North-East of Russia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(6), pages 228-240.
    7. Shanin, Vladimir & Komarov, Alexander & Khoraskina, Yulia & Bykhovets, Sergey & Linkosalo, Tapio & Mäkipää, Raisa, 2013. "Carbon turnover in mixed stands: Modelling possible shifts under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 232-245.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian W. Renner & David I. Warton, 2013. "Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson Point Process Models for Species Distribution Modeling in Ecology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 274-281, March.
    2. Genet, Astrid & Grabarnik, Pavel & Sekretenko, Olga & Pothier, David, 2014. "Incorporating the mechanisms underlying inter-tree competition into a random point process model to improve spatial tree pattern analysis in forestry," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 143-154.
    3. Renshaw, Eric & Mateu, Jorge & Saura, Fuensanta, 2007. "Disentangling mark/point interaction in marked-point processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 3123-3144, March.
    4. Arii, Ken & Caspersen, John P. & Jones, Trevor A. & Thomas, Sean C., 2008. "A selection harvesting algorithm for use in spatially explicit individual-based forest simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 251-266.
    5. Jiao Jieying & Hu Guanyu & Yan Jun, 2021. "A Bayesian marked spatial point processes model for basketball shot chart," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 77-90, June.
    6. Frank Davenport, 2017. "Estimating standard errors in spatial panel models with time varying spatial correlation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 155-177, March.
    7. Kateřina Koňasová & Jiří Dvořák, 2021. "Stochastic Reconstruction for Inhomogeneous Point Patterns," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 527-547, June.
    8. Leandro, Camila & Jay-Robert, Pierre & Mériguet, Bruno & Houard, Xavier & Renner, Ian W., 2020. "Is my sdm good enough? insights from a citizen science dataset in a point process modeling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    9. Redenbach, Claudia & Särkkä, Aila, 2013. "Parameter estimation for growth interaction processes using spatio-temporal information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 672-683.
    10. Vijay Rajagopal & Gregory Bass & Cameron G Walker & David J Crossman & Amorita Petzer & Anthony Hickey & Ivo Siekmann & Masahiko Hoshijima & Mark H Ellisman & Edmund J Crampin & Christian Soeller, 2015. "Examination of the Effects of Heterogeneous Organization of RyR Clusters, Myofibrils and Mitochondria on Ca2+ Release Patterns in Cardiomyocytes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, September.
    11. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Liao, Jinbao & Li, Zhenqing & Quets, Jan J. & Nijs, Ivan, 2013. "Effects of space partitioning in a plant species diversity model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 271-278.
    13. Abdollah Jalilian, 2017. "Modelling and classification of species abundance: a case study in the Barro Colorado Island plot," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2401-2409, October.
    14. Herguido Sevillano, E. & Lavado Contador, J.F. & Schnabel, S. & Pulido, M. & Ibáñez, J., 2018. "Using spatial models of temporal tree dynamics to evaluate the implementation of EU afforestation policies in rangelands of SW Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 166-175.
    15. Athanasios C. Micheas & Jiaxun Chen, 2018. "sppmix: Poisson point process modeling using normal mixture models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1767-1798, December.
    16. F. Seitl & L. Petrich & J. Staněk & C. E. Krill & V. Schmidt & V. Beneš, 2021. "Exploration of Gibbs-Laguerre Tessellations for Three-Dimensional Stochastic Modeling," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 669-693, June.
    17. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.
    18. Ferrari, Pablo A. & Fernández, Roberto & Garcia, Nancy L., 2002. "Perfect simulation for interacting point processes, loss networks and Ising models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 63-88, November.
    19. Raphaël Jauslin & Bardia Panahbehagh & Yves Tillé, 2022. "Sequential spatially balanced sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
    20. Davies, Tilman M. & Jones, Khair & Hazelton, Martin L., 2016. "Symmetric adaptive smoothing regimens for estimation of the spatial relative risk function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 12-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:9:p:1232-1240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.