IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v219y2008i1p234-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating coyote management strategies using a spatially explicit, individual-based, socially structured population model

Author

Listed:
  • Conner, Mary M.
  • Ebinger, Michael R.
  • Knowlton, Frederick F.

Abstract

Managing canid predation on livestock is the leading challenge facing canid conservation worldwide. However, removing canids, and coyotes in particular, to reduce livestock predation is environmentally and socially controversial. In addition, it can be expensive and logistically difficult to field evaluate the myriad of potential selective, spatial, and temporal canid management strategies. Here, we develop a spatially explicit, individual-based simulation model to evaluate commonly used or promoted coyote control strategies. We began with an already constructed non-spatial, individual-based stochastic coyote population model that incorporated behavioral features, such as dominance and territoriality. We added a spatial component and enhanced the social rule set to more realistically model coyote movement and territory replacement. This model merges coyote spatial, social, and population ecology into a management framework. The development, structure, and parameterization of this model are described in detail. For lethal methods, model results suggest that spatially intensive removals are more efficient and long lasting compared to random removal methods. However, sterilization appears to be the management strategy offering the largest and most lasting impact on coyote population dynamics. We recommend adding spatial prey/livestock density and environmental components to this model to further enhance its ecological reality and management usefulness. Although this model is applied to coyotes in particular, it is applicable to many canid species of conservation concern. This model provides a tool to assist in the development of more effective and socially acceptable livestock predation management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Conner, Mary M. & Ebinger, Michael R. & Knowlton, Frederick F., 2008. "Evaluating coyote management strategies using a spatially explicit, individual-based, socially structured population model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 234-247.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:1:p:234-247
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008004328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birch, Colin P.D. & Oom, Sander P. & Beecham, Jonathan A., 2007. "Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 347-359.
    2. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tawfik Guesmi & Badr M. Alshammari & Yasser Almalaq & Ayoob Alateeq & Khalid Alqunun, 2021. "New Coordinated Tuning of SVC and PSSs in Multimachine Power System Using Coyote Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Mori, Kensuke & Massolo, Alessandro & Marceau, Danielle & Stefanakis, Emmanuel, 2023. "Modelling the epidemiology of zoonotic parasites transmitted through a predator-prey system in urban landscapes: The Calgary Echinococcus multilocularis Coyote Agent-based model (CEmCA)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    3. Lewis, D.L. & Breck, S.W. & Wilson, K.R. & Webb, C.T., 2014. "Modeling black bear population dynamics in a human-dominated stochastic environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 51-58.
    4. Watkins, Katherine Shepard & Rose, Kenneth A., 2013. "Evaluating the performance of individual-based animal movement models in novel environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 214-234.
    5. Stenglein, Jennifer L. & Gilbert, Jonathan H. & Wydeven, Adrian P. & Van Deelen, Timothy R., 2015. "An individual-based model for southern Lake Superior wolves: A tool to explore the effect of human-caused mortality on a landscape of risk," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 302(C), pages 13-24.
    6. McLane, Adam J. & Semeniuk, Christina & McDermid, Gregory J. & Marceau, Danielle J., 2011. "The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1544-1556.
    7. Sandra E Baker & Trudy M Sharp & David W Macdonald, 2016. "Assessing Animal Welfare Impacts in the Management of European Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European Moles (Talpa europaea) and Carrion Crows (Corvus corone)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aliyeva, Xeniya & Memon, Shazim Ali & Nazir, Kashif & Kim, Jong, 2024. "Energy consumption forecasting in PCM-integration buildings considering building and environmental parameters for future climate scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    2. Sungsoo Yoon & Youngjoo Moon & Jinah Jeong & Chan-Ryul Park & Wanmo Kang, 2021. "A Network-Based Approach for Reducing Pedestrian Exposure to PM 2.5 Induced by Road Traffic in Seoul," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Santos, Mário & Bastos, Rita & Cabral, João Alexandre, 2013. "Converting conventional ecological datasets in dynamic and dynamic spatially explicit simulations: Current advances and future applications of the Stochastic Dynamic Methodology (StDM)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 91-100.
    4. Christopher T. Emrich & Yao Zhou & Sanam K. Aksha & Herbert E. Longenecker, 2022. "Creating a Nationwide Composite Hazard Index Using Empirically Based Threat Assessment Approaches Applied to Open Geospatial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Boura, Georgia & Ferguson, Neil S., 2024. "Incorporating geographic interdependencies into the resilience assessment of multimodal public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Maria Fabrizia Clemente, 2022. "The Future Impacts of ESL Events in Euro-Mediterranean Coastal Cities: The Coast-RiskBySea Model to Assess the Potential Economic Damages in Naples, Marseille and Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Ryzhkov, Alexander & Sarzhan, Yuliya, 2020. "Market initiative and central planning: A study of the Moscow bus network," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Marchetti, Yuliya & Nguyen, Hai & Braverman, Amy & Cressie, Noel, 2018. "Spatial data compression via adaptive dispersion clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 138-153.
    9. Qiyao Han & Greg Keeffe, 2019. "Mapping the Flow of Forest Migration through the City under Climate Change," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 139-151.
    10. İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight, 2018. "A review of operations research models in invasive species management: state of the art, challenges, and future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 357-403, December.
    11. Nogueira Terra, Talita & Ferreira dos Santos, Rozely, 2012. "Measuring cumulative effects in a fragmented landscape," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 89-95.
    12. Troost, Christian & Huber, Robert & Bell, Andrew R. & van Delden, Hedwig & Filatova, Tatiana & Le, Quang Bao & Lippe, Melvin & Niamir, Leila & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Berger, Thomas, 2023. "How to keep it adequate: A protocol for ensuring validity in agent-based simulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 159, pages 1-21.
    13. Burdziej Jan, 2019. "Using hexagonal grids and network analysis for spatial accessibility assessment in urban environments – a case study of public amenities in Toruń," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 99-110, June.
    14. Pasquale De Toro & Enrico Formato & Nicola Fierro, 2023. "Sustainability Assessments of Peri-Urban Areas: An Evaluation Model for the Territorialization of the Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-32, July.
    15. Kıbış, Eyyüb Y. & Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra, 2017. "Optimizing invasive species management: A mixed-integer linear programming approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 308-321.
    16. Smajgl, Alex & House, Alan P.N. & Butler, James R.A., 2011. "Implications of ecological data constraints for integrated policy and livelihoods modelling: An example from East Kalimantan, Indonesia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 888-896.
    17. Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2019. "Future accessibility impacts of transport policy scenarios: Equity and sensitivity to travel time thresholds for Bus Rapid Transit expansion in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 321-332.
    18. repec:plo:pcbi00:1005903 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Kunegel-Lion, Mélodie & Neilson, Eric W. & Mansuy, Nicolas & Goodsman, Devin W., 2022. "Habitat quality does not predict animal population abundance on frequently disturbed landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    20. Wallentin, Gudrun, 2017. "Spatial simulation: A spatial perspective on individual-based ecology—a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 30-41.
    21. Igor Lugo & Gustavo Martínez-Mekler, 2022. "Theoretical study of the effect of ports in the formation of city systems," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:1:p:234-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.