IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v75y2025ipas1062940824002286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of government’s support policy on decision-making of platform participants under ESG

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Renzhong
  • Fei, Chen
  • Fei, Weiyin

Abstract

Blockchain-based token platform economy is a new branch of digital platform economics. Constructing a continuous time dynamic model of token platform economy, this paper analyzes what kind of ESG policy is appropriate for the government, meanwhile the token platform participants (developers, users and speculators) make optimal investments and decisions under ESG policy. Simulation result shows neutral ESG policy is optimal. Based on the given neutral ESG policy, we have done the research on ESG investment and decision strategies for platform participants. Our research shows that the tokens selling rate and efforts of green platform (ESG score greater than 0) developers are lower than the ones of brown platform (ESG score less than 0). Consequently, when developers’ token retention is about half of the initial amount, users should invest more brown tokens. Speculators should invest brown tokens for developers’ high token retention. Green token investments of speculators and users are needed in other cases. Next, the impact of the government’s three ESG policies on the maturity or termination of the platform also been analyzed. An important conclusion occurred: the government’s aggressive or conservative ESG policy cannot make the development of the green platform better; Therefore, we suggest a neutral ESG policy which means that the government could adopt high tax incentive and high tax burden on the green and brown platform while it is not necessary to implement the extra subsidy and punishment policy on the green and brown platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Renzhong & Fei, Chen & Fei, Weiyin, 2025. "Impact of government’s support policy on decision-making of platform participants under ESG," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:75:y:2025:i:pa:s1062940824002286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2024.102303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824002286
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:75:y:2025:i:pa:s1062940824002286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.