IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v95y2018icp19-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on readiness for preschool: A mixed-methods study of Chinese parents, teachers, and principals

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Sha
  • Li, Hui

Abstract

China has embarked on an ambitious drive to provide universal early childhood education by 2020, which means that all young children need to be ready for preschool by age three. This study adopted a sequential exploratory mixed-methods research design to understand what Chinese parents, teachers, and principals perceive of preschool readiness. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 parents, 11 teachers, and 4 preschool principals, and survey study was conducted with 231 parents to validate the findings from the interviews. The results indicated that: (1) All of the stakeholders accepted the three-construct conception of preschool readiness: ready child, ready family and ready preschool; (2) The ready child construct should include social-emotional readiness in addition to the traditional definition of readiness such as academic competency and pre-literacy skills; and (3) Three concerns were raised in relation to preschool readiness, namely, the lack of adequate ‘educare’, the necessity of childcare experiences prior to preschool, and the appropriate age for preschool entrance. The findings have implications for increased collaboration between home, schools, and communities to develop contextually and culturally relevant practices to promote preschool readiness among young children.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Sha & Li, Hui, 2018. "Perspectives on readiness for preschool: A mixed-methods study of Chinese parents, teachers, and principals," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 19-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:19-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740918306923
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    2. Thomas S. Dee, 2004. "Teachers, Race, and Student Achievement in a Randomized Experiment," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(1), pages 195-210, February.
    3. Lau, Michelle Marie & Li, Hui, 2018. "Is whole-day kindergarten better than half-day kindergarten? A mixed methods study of Chinese educators' perceptions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 365-377.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xie, Sha & Li, Hui, 2020. "Accessibility, affordability, accountability, sustainability and social justice of early childhood education in China: A case study of Shenzhen," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Xie, Sha & Li, Hui, 2021. "Are Chinese urban children ready for preschool? Latent profiles and associated predictors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Najwa Taghy & Linda Cambon & Caroline Boulliat & Olivier Aromatario & Claude Dussart, 2021. "Exploring the Determinants of Polypharmacy Prescribing and Dispensing Behaviours in Primary Care for the Elderly—Protocol for a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Van Droogenbroeck, Ellen & Van Hove, Leo, 2020. "Intra-household task allocation in online grocery shopping: Together alone," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Thomas S. Dee & Emily K. Penner, 2021. "My Brother's Keeper? The Impact of Targeted Educational Supports," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 1171-1196, September.
    5. Stacy, Brian, 2014. "Ranking Teachers when Teacher Value-Added is Heterogeneous Across Students," EconStor Preprints 104743, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. repec:thr:techub:10019:y:2021:i:1:p:607-630 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Eric A. Hanushek & John F. Kain & Steven G. Rivkin & Daniel M. O'Brien, 2005. "The Market for Teacher Quality," Discussion Papers 04-025, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Amy Lowenstein & Allison Friedman-Krauss & C. Cybele Raver & Stephanie Jones & Rachel Pess, 2015. "School Climate, Teacher-Child Closeness, and Low-Income Children’s Academic Skills in Kindergarten," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(2), pages 1-89, November.
    9. Şahika Simsek-Cetinkaya & Simge Evrenol Ocal, 2023. "“Psychological Injuries Are Not Visible†: Experiences and Perceptions of Midwives and Nurses about Domestic Violence during Pregnancy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(8), pages 1115-1123, November.
    10. Alston, Mackenzie & Darity, William A. & Eckel, Catherine C. & McNeil, Lawrence & Sharpe, Rhonda, 2022. "The effect of stereotypes on black college test scores at a historically black university," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 408-424.
    11. Erica Lindahl, 2016. "Are teacher assessments biased? -- evidence from Sweden," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 224-238, April.
    12. Najwa Taghy & Viviane Ramel & Ana Rivadeneyra & Florence Carrouel & Linda Cambon & Claude Dussart, 2023. "Exploring the Determinants of Polypharmacy Prescribing and Dispensing Behaviors in Primary Care for the Elderly—Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Xudan Lin & Hong Zhu & Duo Yin, 2022. "Enhancing Rural Resilience in a Tea Town of China: Exploring Tea Farmers’ Knowledge Production for Tea Planting, Tea Processing and Tea Tasting," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Karnani, Mohit, 2016. "Freshmen teachers and college major choice: Evidence from a random assignment in Chile," MPRA Paper 76062, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    16. Anthony LokTing Yim, 2023. "How Early Morning Classes Change Academic Trajectories: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1334, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    17. Karthik Muralidharan & Ketki Sheth, 2016. "Bridging Education Gender Gaps in Developing Countries: The Role of Female Teachers," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 51(2), pages 269-297.
    18. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    19. Raj Chetty & John N. Friedman & Nathaniel Hilger & Emmanuel Saez & Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach & Danny Yagan, 2011. "How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings? Evidence from Project Star," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 126(4), pages 1593-1660.
    20. Annette Peart & Virginia Lewis & Chris Barton & Grant Russell, 2020. "Healthcare professionals providing care coordination to people living with multimorbidity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2317-2328, July.
    21. Soo-Yong Shin & Eun-Ju Lim, 2021. "Clinical Work and Life of Mid-Career Male Nurses: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:19-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.