IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v84y2018icp35-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualizing effective interventions for smartphone addiction among Korean female adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Chun, JongSerl

Abstract

This study is the first of its kind to conceptualize effective interventions for smartphone addiction among female adolescents in South Korea using a mixed method concept-mapping approach. The participants were Korean female adolescents (N=36) who had been referred to an Internet addiction treatment centers due to their smartphone addiction problems. Concept mapping was conducted to collect, organize, and interpret qualitative data using quantitative techniques such as hierarchical cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling. The study found five clusters of effective interventions: involuntary restriction, self-awareness and self-control, school restrictions, peer support, and professional services. This conceptual framework can be utilized in planning and developing interventions for female adolescents with smartphone addiction.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun, JongSerl, 2018. "Conceptualizing effective interventions for smartphone addiction among Korean female adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 35-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:84:y:2018:i:c:p:35-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740917303869
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnsen, Jeffrey A. & Biegel, David E. & Shafran, Robert, 2000. "Concept mapping in mental health: uses and adaptations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 67-75, February.
    2. Galvin, Patrick F., 1989. "Concept mapping for planning and evaluation of a big brother/big sister program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 53-57, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Turgut Karakose & Tijen Tülübaş & Stamatios Papadakis, 2022. "Revealing the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Digital Addiction Research: An Integrated Bibliometric and Science Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Buctot, Danilo B. & Kim, Nami & Kim, Jinsoo Jason, 2020. "Factors associated with smartphone addiction prevalence and its predictive capacity for health-related quality of life among Filipino adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Sheila Yu & Steve Sussman, 2020. "Does Smartphone Addiction Fall on a Continuum of Addictive Behaviors?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Yi-Ying Wu & Wen-Huei Chou, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis to Identify Research Trends in Intervention Programs for Smartphone Addiction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan, Scott & Wiles, Debra & Cash, Scottye & Siebert, Carl, 2005. "Risk assessments: empirically supported or values driven?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 213-225, February.
    2. Rosas, Scott R. & Ridings, John W., 2017. "The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 265-276.
    3. Matthew D. Wood & Ann Bostrom & Todd Bridges & Igor Linkov, 2012. "Cognitive Mapping Tools: Review and Risk Management Needs," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1333-1348, August.
    4. Houle, Andrée-Anne & Besnard, Thérèse & Bérubé, Annie & Dagenais, Christian, 2018. "Factors that influence parent recruitment into prevention programs in early childhood: A concept map of parents', practitioners', and administrators' points of view," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 127-136.
    5. Patrick Tolan & David Henry & Michael Schoeny & Arin Bass, 2008. "Mentoring Interventions to Affect Juvenile Delinquency and Associated Problems," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 1-112.
    6. Lee, Serim & Chun, JongSerl, 2020. "Conceptualizing the impacts of cyberbullying victimization among Korean male adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Onken, Steven J., 2018. "Mental health consumer concept mapping of supportive community," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-45.
    8. Scott R. Rosas, 2017. "Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1403-1416, May.
    9. De Wit, David J. & Lipman, Ellen & Manzano-Munguia, Maria & Bisanz, Jeffrey & Graham, Kathryn & Offord, David R. & O'Neill, Elizabeth & Pepler, Deborah & Shaver, Karen, 2007. "Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial for evaluating the effectiveness of the Big Brothers Big Sisters community match program at the national level," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 383-404, March.
    10. Rosas, Scott R. & Camphausen, Lauren C., 2007. "The use of concept mapping for scale development and validation in evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-135, May.
    11. Anderson, Lynda A. & Slonim, Amy, 2017. "Perspectives on the strategic uses of concept mapping to address public health challenges," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 194-201.
    12. Lebel, Alexandre & Cantinotti, Michael & Pampalon, Robert & Thériault, Marius & Smith, Lindsay A. & Hamelin, Anne-Marie, 2011. "Concept mapping of diet and physical activity: Uncovering local stakeholders perception in the Quebec City region," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 439-445, February.
    13. Kelly, Cheryl M. & Baker, Elizabeth A. & Brownson, Ross C. & Schootman, Mario, 2007. "Translating research into practice: Using concept mapping to determine locally relevant intervention strategies to increase physical activity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 282-293, August.
    14. Martin, Nigel J. & Rice, John L., 2017. "Examining the use of concept analysis and mapping software for renewable energy feed-in tariff design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 211-220.
    15. P J Caarls & M A van Schijndel & G van den Berk & A D Boenink & D Boerman & J G Lijmer & A Honig & M Terra & A Thijs & B Verwey & J A van Waarde & J van Wijngaarden & J J van Busschbach & on behalf of, 2019. "Factors influencing the admission decision for Medical Psychiatry Units: A concept mapping approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.
    16. Brown, Jason D. & Rodger, Susan, 2009. "Children with disabilities: Problems faced by foster parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 40-46, January.
    17. Crooks, Claire V. & Smith, Alexandra C.G. & Robinson-Link, Natasha & Orenstein, Shawn & Hoover, Sharon, 2020. "Psychosocial interventions in schools with newcomers: A structured conceptualization of system, design, and individual needs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:84:y:2018:i:c:p:35-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.