IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v111y2020ics0190740919314021.html

How long bullying last? A comparison between a self-reported general bullying-victimization question and specific bullying-victimization questions

Author

Listed:
  • Beltran-Catalan, Maria
  • Cruz-Catalan, Esther

Abstract

The absence of agreement on the measurement of bullying victimization hinders bullying identification and intervention. There is not empirical data about the duration of bullying victimization. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 404 students, 23.48% of total students of a Spanish district. Self-perceived duration of bullying was evaluated considering two instrument structures: a general bullying question and multiple specific bullying questions. The mean of bullying victimization was 2 years in the specific questions and 3 years in the general question. Both measurement structures coincided in the classification of 90% of the cases, but the specific bullying victimization questions reported more victims. Results have implications in the time-frame assumed to measure bullying victimization and start to fill a gap in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Beltran-Catalan, Maria & Cruz-Catalan, Esther, 2020. "How long bullying last? A comparison between a self-reported general bullying-victimization question and specific bullying-victimization questions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:111:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919314021
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919314021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cho, Sujung & Lee, Jeoung Min, 2018. "Explaining physical, verbal, and social bullying among bullies, victims of bullying, and bully-victims: Assessing the integrated approach between social control and lifestyles-routine activities theories," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 372-382.
    2. G. Kuder & M. Richardson, 1937. "The theory of the estimation of test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 2(3), pages 151-160, September.
    3. Alina Cosma & Ross Whitehead & Fergus Neville & Dorothy Currie & Jo Inchley, 2017. "Trends in bullying victimization in Scottish adolescents 1994–2014: changing associations with mental well-being," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(6), pages 639-646, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bjereld, Ylva & Augustine, Lilly & Thornberg, Robert, 2020. "Measuring the prevalence of peer bullying victimization: Review of studies from Sweden during 1993–2017," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Fairus Abd Rahman & Nitanan Koshy Matthew, 2021. "Fish Hobbyists’ Willingness to Donate for Wild Fighting Fish ( Betta livida ) Conservation in Klang Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Mohammad Abu-Zaineh & Maame Esi Woode, 2018. "Investigating the Dimensions of Youth Wellbeing: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Approach Applied to Palestine," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, February.
    3. Alina Cosma & Sophie D. Walsh & Kayleigh L. Chester & Mary Callaghan & Michal Molcho & Wendy Craig & William Pickett, 2020. "Bullying victimization: time trends and the overlap between traditional and cyberbullying across countries in Europe and North America," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(1), pages 75-85, January.
    4. Remi Laporte & Philippe Babe & Elisabeth Jouve & Alexandre Daguzan & Franck Mazoue & Philippe Minodier & Guilhem Noel & Diego Urbina & Stephanie Gentile, 2022. "Developing and Validating an Individual-Level Deprivation Index for Children’s Health in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Saokhamkeo, Phoukeo & Dokmaithes, Rapee & Chompoo, Jamnian & Kheerajitt, Cherdpong, 2023. "Factors influencing the practice of commercial rice production for food security in Vientiane capital, Laos," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 13(02), January.
    6. Louis Guttman, 1945. "A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(4), pages 255-282, December.
    7. von Borzyskowski, Inken & Wahman, Michael, 2018. "Systematic measurement error in election violence data: causes and consequences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Mariana Lopes de Sousa & Maria Manuela Peixoto & Sara Figueiredo Cruz, 2021. "The Association between Externalizing and Internalizing Problems with Bullying Engagement in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Social Skills," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Pillai N., Vijayamohanan & A., Rjumohan, 2020. "Reliability, Validity and Uni-Dimensionality: A Primer," MPRA Paper 101714, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. W. Nicewander, 1990. "A latent-trait based reliability estimate and upper bound," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 65-74, March.
    11. Samuel Lyerly, 1958. "The Kuder-Richardson formula (21) as a split-half coefficient, and some remarks on its basic assumption," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(3), pages 267-270, September.
    12. Xu Chen & Ling Li & Gangwu Lv & Hui Li, 2021. "Parental Behavioral Control and Bullying and Victimization of Rural Adolescents in China: The Roles of Deviant Peer Affiliation and Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Mary F. Zhang & Julie Selwyn, 2020. "The Subjective Well-Being of Children and Young People in out of Home Care: Psychometric Analyses of the “Your Life, your Care” Survey," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1549-1572, October.
    14. Nongyao Kasatpibal & Nongkran Viseskul & Wimonsiri Srikantha & Warunee Fongkaew & Natthakarn Surapagdee & Richard M. Grimes, 2014. "Effects of Internet‐based instruction on HIV‐prevention knowledge and practices among men who have sex with men," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 514-520, December.
    15. Melvin Novick & Charles Lewis, 1967. "Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Svenson, Alexander & Guillen, Pablo, 2020. "The links between intelligence, personality, and theory of mind in an adult sample," Working Papers 2020-10, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    17. John Cotton & Donald Campbell & R. Malone, 1957. "The relationship between factorial composition of test items and measures of test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 22(4), pages 347-357, December.
    18. Eduardo Iacoponi & Jair de Jesus Mari, 1989. "Reliability and Factor Structure of the Portuguese Version of Self-Reporting Questionnaire," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 35(3), pages 213-222, September.
    19. Samuel A. Markolf & Kelly Klima & Terrence L. Wong, 2015. "Adaptation frameworks used by US decision-makers: a literature review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 427-436, December.
    20. Peitzmeier, Sarah M. & Wirtz, Andrea L. & Humes, Elizabeth & Hughto, Jaclyn M.W. & Cooney, Erin & Reisner, Sari L., 2021. "The transgender-specific intimate partner violence scale for research and practice: Validation in a sample of transgender women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:111:y:2020:i:c:s0190740919314021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.