IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i6p1994-2005.html

The robust estimation method for a finite mixture of Poisson mixed-effect models

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang, Liming
  • Yau, Kelvin K.W.
  • Lee, Andy H.

Abstract

When analyzing clustered count data derived from several latent subpopulations, the finite mixture of the Poisson mixed-effect model is an immediate strategy to model the underlying heterogeneity. Within the generalized linear mixed model framework, parameters in such a model are often estimated through the residual maximum likelihood estimation approach. However, the method is vulnerable to outliers. To develop robust estimators, the minimum Hellinger distance (MHD) estimation approach has been proposed by Xiang et al. (Xiang, L., Yau, K.K.W., Lee, A.H., Hui, Y.V., 2008. Minimum Hellinger distance estimation for k-component Poisson mixture with random effects. Biometrics 64, 508–518) with the random effects following a normal distribution. In some circumstances, there is little information available on the joint distributional form of the random effects. Without prescribing a parametric form for the random effects distribution, we consider embedding the non-parametric maximum likelihood (NPML) approach within the MHD estimation to extend the robust estimation method for a finite mixture of Poisson mixed-effect models. The NPML estimation not only avoids the problem of numerical integration in deriving the MHD estimating equations, but also enhances the robustness characteristic because of its resistance to possible misspecification of the parametric distribution for the random effects. The performance of the new method is evaluated and compared with that of the existing MHD estimation using simulations. Application to analyze a real data set of recurrent urinary tract infections is illustrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang, Liming & Yau, Kelvin K.W. & Lee, Andy H., 2012. "The robust estimation method for a finite mixture of Poisson mixed-effect models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1994-2005.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:6:p:1994-2005
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947311004270
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2011.12.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray Aitkin, 1999. "A General Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Variance Components in Generalized Linear Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 117-128, March.
    2. Woo, Mi-Ja & Sriram, T.N., 2007. "Robust estimation of mixture complexity for count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4379-4392, May.
    3. Liming Xiang & Kelvin K. W. Yau & Yer Van Hui & Andy H. Lee, 2008. "Minimum Hellinger Distance Estimation for k-Component Poisson Mixture with Random Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 508-518, June.
    4. Warwick, J., 2005. "A data-based method for selecting tuning parameters in minimum distance estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 571-585, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chee, Chew-Seng, 2017. "A mixture model-based nonparametric approach to estimating a count distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 34-44.
    2. Ding, Bowei & Karunamuni, Rohana J. & Wu, Jingjing, 2025. "Minimum profile Hellinger distance estimation of general covariate models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartzel, Jonathan & Liu, I-Ming & Agresti, Alan, 2001. "Describing heterogeneous effects in stratified ordinal contingency tables, with application to multi-center clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 429-449, February.
    2. Jamie L. Cross & Lennart Hoogerheide & Paul Labonne & Herman K. van Djik, 2024. "Flexible Negative Binomial Mixtures for Credible Mode Inference in Heterogeneous Count Data from Finance, Economics and Bioinformatics," Working Papers No 09/2024, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    3. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    4. Brian Francis & Jiayi Liu, 2015. "Modelling escalation in crime seriousness: a latent variable approach," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(2), pages 277-297, August.
    5. Zhang, Daowen & Davidian, Marie, 2004. "Likelihood and conditional likelihood inference for generalized additive mixed models for clustered data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 90-106, October.
    6. Frangos, Nikolaos & Karlis, Dimitris, 2004. "Modelling losses using an exponential-inverse Gaussian distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 53-67, August.
    7. Wu, Jingjing & Karunamuni, Rohana J., 2012. "Efficient Hellinger distance estimates for semiparametric models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-23.
    8. Jingjing Wu & Tasnima Abedin & Qiang Zhao, 2023. "Semiparametric modelling of two-component mixtures with stochastic dominance," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(1), pages 39-70, February.
    9. Getachew A. Dagne, 2016. "A growth mixture Tobit model: application to AIDS studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 1174-1185, July.
    10. Victor Chernozhukov & Ivan Fernandez-Val & Jinyong Hahn & Whitney K. Newey, 2008. "Identification and estimation of marginal effects in nonlinear panel models," CeMMAP working papers CWP25/08, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    11. Mark S. Pearce & Heather O. Dickinson & Murray Aitkin & Louise Parker, 2002. "Still‐births among the offspring of male radiation workers at the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant: detailed results and statistical aspects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(3), pages 523-548, October.
    12. Marino, Maria Francesca & Alfó, Marco, 2016. "Gaussian quadrature approximations in mixed hidden Markov models for longitudinal data: A simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 193-209.
    13. Suzanne J Carroll & Michael J Dale & Theophile Niyonsenga & Anne W Taylor & Mark Daniel, 2020. "Associations between area socioeconomic status, individual mental health, physical activity, diet and change in cardiometabolic risk amongst a cohort of Australian adults: A longitudinal path analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    15. Sylvia Richardson & Laurent Leblond & Isabelle Jaussent & Peter J. Green, 2002. "Mixture models in measurement error problems, with reference to epidemiological studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(3), pages 549-566, October.
    16. Chiara Masci & Francesca Ieva & Anna Maria Paganoni, 2024. "Inferential Tools for Assessing Dependence Across Response Categories in Multinomial Models with Discrete Random Effects," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 41(3), pages 591-619, November.
    17. Umashanger, T. & Sriram, T.N., 2009. "L2E estimation of mixture complexity for count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4243-4254, October.
    18. Lluís Bermúdez & Dimitris Karlis & Isabel Morillo, 2020. "Modelling Unobserved Heterogeneity in Claim Counts Using Finite Mixture Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Roula Tsonaka & Dimitris Rizopoulos & Geert Verbeke & Emmanuel Lesaffre, 2010. "Nonignorable Models for Intermittently Missing Categorical Longitudinal Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 834-844, September.
    20. Marco Alfo & Giovanni Trovato & Robert J. Waldmann, 2008. "Testing for country heterogeneity in growth models using a finite mixture approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4), pages 487-514.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:6:p:1994-2005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.