IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Ensemble classification of paired data

Listed author(s):
  • Adler, Werner
  • Brenning, Alexander
  • Potapov, Sergej
  • Schmid, Matthias
  • Lausen, Berthold
Registered author(s):

    In many medical applications, data are taken from paired organs or from repeated measurements of the same organ or subject. Subject based as opposed to observation based evaluation of these data results in increased efficiency of the estimation of the misclassification rate. A subject based approach for classification in the generation of bootstrap samples of bagging and bundling methods is analyzed. A simulation model is used to compare the performance of different strategies to create the bootstrap samples which are used to grow individual trees. The proposed approach is compared to linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, random forests and gradient boosting. Finally, the simulation results are applied to glaucoma diagnosis using both eyes of glaucoma patients and healthy controls. It is demonstrated that the proposed subject based resampling reduces the misclassification rate.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.

    Volume (Year): 55 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 5 (May)
    Pages: 1933-1941

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:1933-1941
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Iranpanah, N. & Mohammadzadeh, M. & Taylor, C.C., 2011. "A comparison of block and semi-parametric bootstrap methods for variance estimation in spatial statistics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 578-587, January.
    2. Hothorn, Torsten & Lausen, Berthold, 2005. "Bundling classifiers by bagging trees," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 1068-1078, June.
    3. Rokach, Lior, 2009. "Taxonomy for characterizing ensemble methods in classification tasks: A review and annotated bibliography," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4046-4072, October.
    4. Adler, Werner & Lausen, Berthold, 2009. "Bootstrap estimated true and false positive rates and ROC curve," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 718-729, January.
    5. De Bock, Koen W. & Coussement, Kristof & Van den Poel, Dirk, 2010. "Ensemble classification based on generalized additive models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1535-1546, June.
    6. Zhang, Chun-Xia & Zhang, Jiang-She & Zhang, Gai-Ying, 2009. "Using Boosting to prune Double-Bagging ensembles," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1218-1231, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:1933-1941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.